Posted on 12/21/2008 8:18:02 AM PST by Calpernia
Cover Letter
Request to refile Petition Lightfoot v Bowen with chief Justice John Roberts
Dear Justice Roberts,
This is an open cover letter and it is being posted on the Internet, you-tube and will be read on a number of radio stations, particularly radio stations around military bases, forwarded to Congress, Senate, Governors of the States and mass media. This legal action, as 20 other actions filed in the past few months is seeking Judicial intervention due to the fact that Mr. Barack Obama, whose father was a Kenyan- British citizen, is not a Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be the President of this country. It also states, that Mr. Obama did not prove his citizenship at all, since the state of Hawaii allows issuance of Hawaiian Birth certificates to foreign born children of Hawaiian residents and there is mounting evidence that Mr. Obama was not born in Hawaii, whereby he will not be a citizen at all. The Plaintiffs in this action are a vice-presidential candidate on the ballot, electors and voters. Majority of the plaintiffs have served years of their lives in the US military and risked their lives, pursuant to their oath to defend the Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The plaintiffs and other members of the US military are deeply concerned about the fact that none of the cases related to Mr. Obama’s lack of eligibility was heard on the merits.
The plaintiffs are also concerned about the following: You have recorded a program “Conversations with Chief Justice Roberts”. Numerous high schools students were flown in to DC and participated in discussion about the Constitution, law and the Supreme Court with you. This program was fully funded by the Annenberg foundation, is it clearly states on the video released, and it appears that as a Chief Justice of the Supreme court you consider Annenberg to be a reputable organization, supporting the Constitution and you support their efforts. The problem with it, is that Annenberg has been employing on their Annenberg Challenge board William Ayers, a non-repentant terrorist that participated in bombing of police headquarters in 1970, Capitol building in 1971 and Pentagon in 1972. As late as 2001, Mr. Ayers stated in NY times interview: “I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel I didn’t do enough”. From 1995 the chairman of Annenberg Challenge was none else, but Mr. Barack Obama. Annenberg has created an offshoot, called Factcheck.org, Annenberg political Fact check, that was supposed to provide unbiased fact check. In reality Annenberg fact check has actively and intentionally defrauded American public in letting them to believe that Mr. Obama is a Natural born citizen and eligible for US presidency. Annenberg fact check intentionally omitted
Definition of Law of Nations (Emmerich De Vettel), stating that natural born citizen is one that is born in the country to parents, that are citizens. They omitted statement by John A Bingham, framer of the 14th amendment, stating that a natural born citizen is one that was born in the US territory to parents that don’t owe alliance to any other sovereignty. Due to the fact that Mr. Obama’s father was not a US citizen and owed allegiance to Kenya and Great Britain, Mr. Obama did not qualify as a natural born citizen and does not qualify for presidency. Fact check intentionally omitted Hawaii statue 338, that allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residence to obtain a Hawaiian certification of live birth It omitted the fact that such certification can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence. It omitted the fact that there was no corroborating evidence of Mr. Obama’s birth from any hospital, nurse or hospital administrator from Hawaii, while there were numerous statements from Mr. Obama’s Kenyan grandmother, Baptist Bishop and ambassador of Kenya about Mr. Obama being born there. If that is the case, Mr. Obama is not a US citizen and will need to go back to Kenya to wait for his Green Card.
As of now American public has only information from Annenberg, a political organization, some of whose members have very questionable moral qualities (to say the least).
My clients, as well as 300 million American, including thousands of members of the military, that are asked to give their lives to defend the Constitution of this country, would like to know, if the Supreme Court Justices, particularly chief Justice Roberts, (that needs to swear the President on the bible), are willing to give a few hours of their time to hear the Oral Argument in defense of this Constitution. They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Council for the Petitioners
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
YouTube Channel, DrOrlyTV
>>>Whether his dual citizenship disqualifies him isn’t so clear .
It is clear.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2148074/posts
Law of Nations; or Principles of the Law of Nature: Applies to the Conduct & Affairs of Nations & Sovereigns
It is clear.I always get in trouble with side arguments. lol. I'll just withdraw that statement.
The point is it doesn't matter. This system was designed to prevent the decision from ever getting into Federal Court.
I think you are right about that.
If federal law provides for a grand total of 2 hours’ debate on ALL objections to eligibility, then it is almost irrelevant whether one or more Congressman wish to object on these grounds. It would be trivially easy to control the schedule and just run out the clock by having the person presiding recognize first those people who would have made prior arrangements to come up with some other meaningless “objections” so that there is no time left to get around to this one. It’s all a game.
In other words, Congress is the court of last resort to unmask this imposter. If they fail to act, America will be swept into the pile of failed experiments.
If federal law provides for a grand total of 2 hours’ debate on ALL objections to eligibility, then it is almost irrelevant whether one or more Congressman wish to object on these grounds.First, I think it's 2 hours per objection. Still not much time.
The reality about Congressional debates is the real work is done through informal lobbying and discussions beforehand. For instance, the calls and letters freepers are sending in. I doubt any Congressman actually changes his or her mind in the public debate. It's really for putting the reasons for their vote on the record.
The two hour limit in statute does mean that there are no delaying tactics that can drag the vote out forever. No filibusters or referrals to committee. One way or another the vote will take place shortly after the electoral votes are counted.
Congress is the most political branch of the government. Constituent opinion will play heavily in each members mind. They have to stand for reelection after all. That's why the founders gave them this job.
This process was designed for speed and certainty. Remember, the inauguration used to be in March. It was moved up to shorten the time we spend with a lame duck administration.
Consider what would happen if the president elect were disqualified a couple of weeks before the inauguration. Not just the riots that some have speculated about. How would the financial markets respond to the uncertainty? Which foreign powers would take advantage of the situation? I'm sure these questions will weigh heavily on Congress's mind.
All of these issues are valid concerns. A lot of tough issues here for Congress.
This is a good discussion but I have to run right now. I will check back in tonight and try to respond. See my about page for some pointers to more resources.
Orly is reapplying to SCOTUS. Directly to Justice Roberts.
The man is not loyal to his country for good reason. Its obvious to me he considers himself a sophisticated foreigner, above the rest of us with his nose in the air. I have seen his type before. Trash.
I now believe that the SCOTUS is worthless and doesn’t intend to do it’s job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.