Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS To Discuss Obama Birth Certificate Case on January 9
The Patriot Room ^ | December 20, 2008 | Bill Dupray

Posted on 12/20/2008 1:21:22 PM PST by Bill Dupray

It’s Philip Berg’s case and it is a meeting to discuss whether to grant certiorari.

More . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotroom.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; berg; bho2008; birthcertificate; birthers; blackhelicopters; certificate; certifigate; conspiracytheories; crackpots; democrats; fraud; obama; obamabots; obamagate; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; phony; rinobullies; supremecourt; tinfoilhats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Drew68

No controlling legal authority.


61 posted on 12/20/2008 9:09:27 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Prole
Q.: How many U.S. Supreme Court justices does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: No one knows, because the Justices won't accept the light bulb for review, and they won't explain why.

A: The question should be rephrased: How many U.S. Supreme Court justices does it take to screw the U.S Constitution and the American people?

62 posted on 12/21/2008 2:56:42 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
His people have spent considerable sums in legal fees fighting attempts in court.

Or not.

Everyone is assuming that since, yes, Obama DOES employee legal advisors on his transition team (crazy, I know) and some of these advisors have gone through the paperwork drill of filing routine "Motions to Dismiss" that Obama is somehow spending millions of dollars to seal his "vault" BC --something Hawaiian State Law does for free.

Do you have a link to a reputable source to back up your "considerable sums" claim? And by "reputable source" I don't mean some truther's blog page.

63 posted on 12/21/2008 7:54:05 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
McCain was asked by the screaming press to show his birth certificate to them and the public. Two days later McCain released his birth certificate to the public.

So did Obama. That a truther with a fake name (and an equally fake PhD) is claiming Obama's BC isn't real is of no significance. He showed it. Hawaii verified it. The Election Commission bought it. The courts so far agree.

64 posted on 12/21/2008 7:58:24 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Well said, thank you. Just because Berg or whoever does or says something Kookie doesn’t mean everything they say is false. There is so much evidence that the BC “That One” placed on his website is a fraud that should be the point not what Berg said at one time in his life.


65 posted on 12/21/2008 9:02:49 AM PST by classical artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Why are you lying for the Kenyan Klown? What do you gain from this obvious fabrication?

He has not presented a valid birth certificate and Hawaii verified nothing of legal value.


66 posted on 12/21/2008 9:09:26 AM PST by Eaker (I am Going to Give B. Hussein O. The Very Same Respect the Media Gave George Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Prole
SCOTUS probably knows the score, but the d@mn fools refuse to acknowledge the truth before the American taxpayers.

If Obama is not eligible, the Supreme Court will have to tread very delicately to prevent a Constitutional Crisis. The best outcome I can see would be for the Supreme Court to announce that there is no deadline for Obama to prove eligibility, but that Biden will serve as Acting President until such time as Obama does so.

As to whether there's any way they'll figure that out, I'm not optimistic.

67 posted on 12/21/2008 2:57:15 PM PST by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Do you have a link to a reputable source to back up your "considerable sums" claim?

Doesn't matter. You can omit that entirely if you wish.

My claim that I, as an American citizen, have as much right as the SCOTUS to demand a BC is sufficient by itself. And, as I said, constitutionally speaking, I don't need legal representation or "government defined" legal authority to do so.

It's not rocket science if one places any value on the Constitution. The founding fathers are turning over in their graves over the notion that I must have government permission to demand proof of birth from a presidential candidate.

68 posted on 12/21/2008 2:59:34 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
I don't know if The Globe is a Clinton organization, but I know The National Enquirer is.

The Clinton machine will dismantle Obama one piece at a time.

69 posted on 12/21/2008 5:02:25 PM PST by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

I wonder who he thinks he’s fooling.


70 posted on 12/21/2008 7:09:09 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Muahahahahahaha, you funny full. Oh, and you must be right, mister axelrod, every single document from Obama’s adult life save three (which are either evidence of his lying/perjury, exposed forgeries, or altered selective service copy) has been taken from public scrutiny two years ago and hidden to protect the affirmative action poseur. This has to be mere coinkydink ‘cause you brown-nosing sycophants insist the fraudulent flunky hasn’t spent any money hiding his past. [And that brown on your face isn’t racial, but we don’t know yet if it’s chocloate or if it isn’t and has a smell. I doubt any credible freeper would want to get close enough to you to find the answer so you have a nice night, ya heauh.]


71 posted on 12/21/2008 7:20:11 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

That front page will cost the Globe a company closing, The Zero will see to that.


72 posted on 12/21/2008 7:31:12 PM PST by nbhunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
And that brown on your face isn’t racial, but we don’t know yet if it’s chocloate or if it isn’t and has a smell. I doubt any credible freeper would want to get close enough to you to find the answer so you have a nice night, ya heauh.

OK, now you're just drunk again.

Dude! It's Sunday night!

73 posted on 12/21/2008 7:47:39 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I happen to have used my last Twinnings Breakfast tea the other day so I’m finishing my mug of domestic gray tea with milk and sugar and heading off to a warm bed. The wind chills in the area are in single digits. And here’s a little advice: try washing your face beofre you go to bed. Use soap. And wash out those nasth ears which itch for lies to repeat.


74 posted on 12/21/2008 9:02:52 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Bill Dupray
I have read on the internet that someone has seen the Stanley Dunham --- Indonesian citizen Soetoro Hawaii divorce papers because they are supposedly public records, but I have not heard or seen anything about the Stanley Dunham --- Barack Obama, Senior divorce papers.

Anyone here heard or seen a website that claims to have seen the Stanley Dunham --- Barack Obama, Senior Hawaii divorce papers? Do they even exist? Thanks.

75 posted on 12/21/2008 11:59:55 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
Q. How many of the 9 Supreme Court justices does it take to change an Obama?

A. None, because the Supreme Court justices are too scared to mess around with an Obama.

76 posted on 12/22/2008 12:03:36 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: supercat
SCOTUS probably knows the score, but the d@mn fools refuse to acknowledge the truth before the American taxpayers. If Obama is not eligible, the Supreme Court will have to tread very delicately to prevent a Constitutional Crisis. The best outcome I can see would be for the Supreme Court to announce that there is no deadline for Obama to prove eligibility, but that Biden will serve as Acting President until such time as Obama does so. As to whether there's any way they'll figure that out, I'm not optimistic. ____________________________________________________________ Right now in the news (LA Times) there was a page pulled about Arnold considering a run in 2012, I wonder why? Too timely and sensitive a subject? I have a pretty strong feeling if a Palin/Schwarzenegger subject was brought up in the news it would get the attention of the Hussein Internet Brigade.
77 posted on 12/22/2008 6:25:48 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

name just one court that has laughed at the major cases presented, keyes, berg, donofrio. As far as I can tell the scotus has given these far more consideration than they do 98 percent of the cases brought to them.


78 posted on 12/22/2008 7:00:35 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GizmosAndGadgets; kwdavids

Don’t know if this helps with the info in the different boxes of a Hawaii BC, but here goes.

I have a 1968 Hawaii “Certificate of Live Birth”

Box 7C on my certificate says “city, town or location”. It is the info for the mother of the baby and where the mother lives.
Box7A is the State of Residence of mother at time of birth
Box 7b is county of mother at time of birth
Box 7c is the city, town or location (residence) of mother at time of birth.

To find the Certificate info for the baby you go to:
Box 5a county of birth of baby
Box 5b city, town or location of birth of baby
5c inside city limits (yes or no)
Box 5d is hospital name


79 posted on 12/23/2008 3:29:10 AM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #80 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson