“Obama’s qualification is not at issue at the counting...only the qualifications of the Electors’ votes.”
On the face of it, your interpretation appears consistent with the language of 3USC15.
Clearly, however, an elector appointed by Mickey Mouse can not be said to have been appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, given MM is patently unqualified to serve as President.
Further, an electoral vote for MM cannot be said to have been “regularly given”.
We are told O handpicked his electors. If he was born in Kenya, he knows he is unqualified. (Even if Frank Davis is on the BC, which would have been ludicrous in 1961.) Therefore, his electors would not have been legally appointed and, whether or not they had knowledge O was unqualified, their votes are subject to objection.
If one argues state officials certified the vote and there can be no issue, the response is the state acted in reliance on O’s fraudulent certification that he was qualified for the office. He was after all, as a US Senator, presumed to be a man of honor and integrity.
The Vice-President certifies the EC vote. But the rest of the sentence should be correct. The second sentence, umm, well...
But that is not given- it is unknown. The states and electors have failed to examine his qualifications. Furthermore according to the states' procedures he is apparently qualified!
At this point it is a matter for a trial in the courts to determine if there has been a fraud.
Of course after he is president the congress could impeach and remove him for fraudulent qualification.