Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot
"given MM is patently unqualified to serve as President. "

But that is not given- it is unknown. The states and electors have failed to examine his qualifications. Furthermore according to the states' procedures he is apparently qualified!

At this point it is a matter for a trial in the courts to determine if there has been a fraud.

Of course after he is president the congress could impeach and remove him for fraudulent qualification.

145 posted on 12/17/2008 8:16:24 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

“Furthermore according to the states’ procedures he is apparently qualified!”

First, there is the question: “On what basis does he appear qualified?” And the answer can only be: “Because he said so.” Certainly you will agree that nowhere in our dealings with any branch of government is that sufficient.

If you argue he satisified the state qualfication procedures so there is no issue, the response is the state accepted the “Because he said so.” and failed to verify O’s certification.

If you are saying that although the Congress is charged via the 12th amemdment with the responsibility of accepting, counting and certifying the votes for a candidate, but that it has no authority under the Constitution or 3USC15 to challenge and verify the Consitutionally required qualifications of that candidate, you and I will just have to disagree.


148 posted on 12/17/2008 9:07:22 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson