Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cort Wrotnowski hand delivers his Emergency Application to SCOTUS this morning!
Natural Born Citizen Blog - Leo Donofrio ^ | 12-2-2008 | Leo C. Donofrio

Posted on 12/02/2008 11:03:04 AM PST by Frantzie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Frantzie
Bravo Cort!

I have tears in my eyes. What a hero. A real American. Knocking down every stupid stumbling block put in his way.

Cort and Leo, keep fighting the good fight! and thank you so much for your sacrifices.

I need a tissue....

21 posted on 12/02/2008 11:43:17 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
What a cancer! We need scalpels with no anesthesia.

This is what that second amendment thingy and the part in the Declaration about tyranny is all about.

22 posted on 12/02/2008 11:45:59 AM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

What a great analogy- Paul Revere.
Who would have thought of that?


23 posted on 12/02/2008 11:49:01 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Hmmm.... Sounds a lot like the meddling the clerk did in Donofrio’s case! I’d start calling for an investigation ASAP of the clerks at SCOTUS. One bad apple, well we would kind of expect that, but this is 2 filings now, and 2 different clerks at SCOTUS that are “coincidentally” delaying delivery of papers to our judges, and BOTH of these cases - again “Coincidentally” - are pertaining the election, and Obama. That’s an awful lot of coincidences, IMHO.


24 posted on 12/02/2008 11:50:46 AM PST by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella
This is what that second amendment thingy and the part in the Declaration about tyranny is all about.

Yep, I'll never take a knife to a gunfight! LOL

25 posted on 12/02/2008 11:53:31 AM PST by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
With it being such a profound Constitutional issue you’d think it would be a slam dunk 9-0.

You would think.
But I'm sure Ginsburg, Souter, Stevens, and Breyer will vote to ignore it. And I'm not so bullish about Kennedy, Roberts, and Alito - as are others...
I know that IF this has merit - the pressure being applied has to be fierce. Nonetheless - this is the Supreme Court of the United States - their job is to stand and to uphold the Constitution no matter what darts and arrows get flung their way...

As a partial disclaimer... I have consistently run down the validity of this 'not born in the USA' accusation...
It makes no sense to me how a fraud of this magnitude could have been perpetuated and maintained for this long a time. But the way the Obama folks have refused to produce a birth certificate (really - almost the only requirement to prove one is eligible to be President) to their employer (the people of the United States), and the non-response response from the State of Hawaii has gone beyond the creepiness phase into the phase of believing that there is an actual fire behind all this smoke...Very odd.

26 posted on 12/02/2008 11:55:12 AM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

God Bless these brave and heroic American Patriots. Our beloved country needs all of her champions at this most critical time.


27 posted on 12/02/2008 11:55:34 AM PST by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm

SCOTUS updated to Cort’s case.

Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.


28 posted on 12/02/2008 12:02:11 PM PST by joygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; Smokin' Joe; OL Hickory; Poincare; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; ...
Ping

Woo-hoo!

[UPDATE 2:44pm] - Cort’s docket has been updated at SCOTUS.  The application has been “refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia”.


29 posted on 12/02/2008 12:05:07 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
No. 08A469
Title:
Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
  Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.

Note: it was post-dated to Nov 29. Greater likelihood it can be heard before the holiday break!


30 posted on 12/02/2008 12:10:09 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I would love to see Mark Levin get involved in this.


31 posted on 12/02/2008 12:13:20 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Cid
No doubt pressure is being applied behind the scenes. Just reading what few stories there are out there they're mostly ridicule directed at those who want to see verifiable proof that Obama is qualified under the Constitution.

It's not too much to ask but the goal I believe is to so downplay the case that the Supremes themselves will be afraid to look at it otherwise they too would be lumped in with the "fringe". It's an old standby tactic but easy to see through and hopefully the Court, whatever their decision bases it on Constitional law only and nothing else.

32 posted on 12/02/2008 12:16:44 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BP2

So it is on the docket and we know it is going to Scalia on emergency basis.

I hope they can join it with Leo’s case.

Awesome job by Cort and Leo.


33 posted on 12/02/2008 12:19:32 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

I would love to see some courage from any AM talk show hosts.


34 posted on 12/02/2008 12:20:41 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Thanks for the ping! Great news!

Freepers, look up Cort’s address at the USSC site. Think about sending him a note of thanks and perhaps you might want to do what I did. I sent him a late Thanksgiving gift and also sent one to Leo a week before Thanksgiving. :)


35 posted on 12/02/2008 12:20:51 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Also updated today:

Dec 1 2008 Letter from applicant dated November 22, 2008, received.

From Leo's blog this am:

In my case, SCOTUS Docket No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, the docket has been updated to include the letter I sent to all nine Justices which included copies of official Judicial Misconduct allegations against the New Jersey Judge who handled my initial NJ Appellate Division case.  This is important because the letter made clear that should the SCOTUS request an official copy of the case file from the lower court, the file on record there is fraudulent.

It’s significant to note that I sent this letter directly to the nine Justices.  While I did send a copy to the Clerk of the Court, the copies I sent to Justices went directly to them without asking the Clerk to distribute them.  Since this was not an official pleading, I wasn’t required to go through the Clerk’s office.  The letter was sent on November 22, 2008 but has only just hit the Docket today, December 2, 2008.  I didn’t think this letter would become part of the Docket.  I expect members of the press might be able to find out what this means. Nobody in the Clerk’s office will take my calls.

36 posted on 12/02/2008 12:22:48 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Mega dittoes, you’re a great American! Morning glory and evening grace!


37 posted on 12/02/2008 12:23:04 PM PST by Welcome2thejungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; Smokin' Joe; OL Hickory; Poincare; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; ...
[UPDATE 3:12 pm]

Cort’s Docket now shows that the renewed application to Justice Scalia is dated Nov. 29.  That’s the date Cort express mailed the original papers.  We don’t know if they’ve passed the original papers on or if they used the new papers submitted in person today by Cort.  If they used the old papers, then why was Cort told yesterday it would take seven days?  Perhaps they used the new papers with the original date of filing.  We don’t know.

More monkey business by Bickel the pickle

38 posted on 12/02/2008 12:26:41 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: El Cid
I'm sure you remember this, but for readers trying to catch up, here's a bit regarding The Honorable Justice Thomas and barack obama.

When the Saddleback interview happened and Pastor Warren asked obama which justice on the SCOTUS he would remove if he had the chance, the obnoxious obama stated that he would not have nominated Judge Thomas because he was not quali... er ... not of proper judicial temperament.

Affirmative action candidate obama claims to be Constitutional Law educated. If someone has read a few of Justice Thomas's rulings while on the SCOTUS, it is readily apparent that Justice Thomas is a brilliant man of amazingly even temperament.

The Chicago squirrel isn't qualified to tie Justice Thomas's shoes, much less decide his qualification for the bench. And this Donofrio case was sent to Justice Thomas.

Freepers have written many letters directly to the Honorable Justice Thomas. God has provided US with a judicial warrior of uncommon brilliance. He will see to it that this issue is vetted properly and not left hanging for future morass to ensue over any obama bill signed into law and subsequently challenged.

39 posted on 12/02/2008 12:46:04 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Yes. Maybe, they don’t want to be accused of “inciting a riot”.


40 posted on 12/02/2008 1:32:38 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson