Posted on 12/02/2008 5:12:31 AM PST by Shellybenoit
If you read the NY Times this weekend, you would have read that the Mubai terrorist attacks were the fault of Muslim Extremists and the Hindus. In this disgusting Op-Ed they tried to give an even handed explanation of the horrid events last week. They refused to acknowledge that the Muslim murderers were targeting Jews and Westerners. Hell, the refused to acknowledge that they were terrorists, they were militants. But its not just the NY Times, their lead was followed by most of the Mainstream Media. ENOUGH ALREADY !! THEY WEREN'T MILITANTS THEY WERE TERRORISTS....LIKE MOST OF THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS THEY WERE TARGETING JEWS AND WESTERNERS.
(Excerpt) Read more at yidwithlid.blogspot.com ...
the press photos showing their dead bodies is calling them
“alleged militants”
>>>>>LIKE MOST OF THE ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS THEY WERE TARGETING JEWS AND WESTERNERS.<<<<<<
Not to mention the 175 Indians they targeted for murder.
Someone posted a list yesterday of the hundreds of jihadi terror attacks against Indian citizens since 9/11.
Even the day of targeted attacks that killed more than 200 Mumbai train commuters in July 2006 didn’t get much coverage here in the U.S.
That’s okay, they tried to lie and say that the Weather Underground were 1960s antiwar radicals. They were formed in November of 1969 and operated into the 1980s. They were a 1970s pro-Communist insurgency group that declared WAR formally against the United States. They weren’t against war, they engaged in it and wanted the North Vietnamese to WIN the Vietnam War. They were traitors who should have been tried, convicted, and shot for rising up against America.
“they weren’t militants, they were terrorists”
and...they aren’t a legitimate political movement but a bunch of murdering, torturing thugs who “profile” westerners, especially jews, for “special treatment”.
(one wonders how many “american congressmen” sympathize with the well-trained thugs who killed un-armed people.)
IMHO
As I've said elsewhere, I see the reason for the sympathy of liberals for terrorists is their mutual hate of capitalism and all things associated with freedom. This is due to their not having any common sense, and by Jeff Head's comments we can see that it's mostly attributable to their immaturity.
Regardless, it's the classic case of appeasing the crocodile. They're still going to be eaten.
IMO liberals actually sympathize and like terrorists. They’re just too chickenshit to act that way themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.