Posted on 12/01/2008 9:00:22 AM PST by Victory111
Why has every major news source in the United States almost totally blacked out all reference to the Hawaiian Obama birth certificate controversy?
In layman’s terms the mainstream media may be afraid of showing up with egg on its face. Yet, the question about the allegedly fraudulent COLB (certificate of live birth) doesn’t want to go away. It is more than simple curiosity that is driving the quest; it is a strong desire for the truth and the hope of avoiding a constitutional crisis that would be unparalleled in our entire history as a nation.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
Well, you might think that way, but that would only apply from here on out.
I don’t think even the Supreme Court has the courage to ask Obama for his long form original vault copy BC.
I was listening to Bill Handel this morning who had done something last week (didn’t hear that show) that was SARCASTICALLY against Obama, but not actually. He voted for Obama. Yet this morning he was reading the hate mail he got from that day, from idiots who did not understand that it was all in jest.
These Obamaricans were clueless, but man, were they vulgar and mean. They called Handel every name in the book. He said he would print the letters on his page on the KFI website.
I remember when some Republicans in Congress didn’t want to remove Clinton from office, or even read all of his offenses (that were on display in a room in the Capitol somewhere - many never even visited to check the evidence), and their excuse was that they didn’t want to throw the American people into chaos by so doing.
This would be far worse, if Obama is not qualified. I hope he is. If he is not qualified, many Obama voters will not see it as remaining true to the Law our country was founded upon. They will start up with how slavery was wrong, the Founding Fathers didn’t know jack, and what does it matter where Obama was born: he was duly elected. And the MSM will agree with them.
No one would have the courage to risk all that. And yet that would be the correct thing to do.
I think I am going to encourage my politically minded children to consider journalism. We need some good conservative journalists in this country to keep the checks and balances.
Everyone should read Edwin Viera’s article posted on the net today.
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=20210273
Viera is a Harvard honors grad for BA, MA, JD and PhD. He ws not on the foreign student affirmative action program.
The article has a few incredible points:
1. If Obama signs any law that has a criminal penalty like his No Abortion (aka Dead Baby) Left Behind law. A criminal defendant can demand O produce his BC and he will have to provide it. The defendant will have a team of forensic people who will most likely prove it is a fraud. All hell will break loose then.
2. O by not producing the BC is committing a major fraud and Viera or any (sane) attorney would quit as counsel for O. He makes no mention if O could be criminally charged.
3. This thing is not going to go away. Lawsuits will be filed even after he is sworn in. Laws, appointments, treaties, actions, amendments or just about anything he does could be thrown out. This will cause legal and Constitutional chaos. The Supreme Court Justices, in my view, cannot punt on this thing. It is legal and Constitutional aramgeddon caused by O and the DNC.
Well, AFAYK, probably isn’t really good enough. He may have needed one as a senator, AFAAKs.
[iPhone app] The ConstitutionFunny, right? Sure. Just like nitrous -- laughing gas -- makes one 'funny' -- the long term effects of indulging such slandering and cynical humor are utter stupidity, a mental derangement that is like an edgy senility. I can name one culture where such humor was common.Imagine it's a lazy Sunday morning. You're lounging about in your most comfortable thong, enjoying some German horse pornography--then suddenly there's a knock at the door. It's Barack Obama's Communist Police force, there to take your guns! Free Republic was right!
Fortunately, you know your rights because you're the proud owner of the Constitution reference application. Though the developer neglected to include a search function, so this program is best utilized by those that have already memorized the Constitution. And that's you... right?
Because I've watched "Cabaret". That is, they got the 'german animal porn' reference right -- but strangely the reference is to those who who enjoy such 'sophisticated' humor! That is, to the reader of 'Cracked'. To the writer of this piece -- it was in his mind that the image first sprung up. And why was that, eh?
We all go through phases of our life where such biting, nasty cynical humor is welcome. Yet we tend to get out of such rumps, or get older, wiser, kinder. In time we learn to shut it out, to see it as the rot-gut liquor it is. It provides a short immediate relief, but makes one sick and comes to rot the gut.
Members of Congress get access to whatever classified documents they need to do their jobs. They're not subject to a background check for such access- being elected is, essentially, the background check.
The Supreme Court Justices, in my view, cannot punt on this thing.
The closest they can come to punting is to remand the case back to the lower court with an order requiring production of the birth certificate.
Once that occurs (if it ever occurs) a determination can be made regarding his true status. If the losing side is unhappy with that conclusion, an appeal can be taken to contest the application of the law to the facts contained in his BC.
I wouldnt mind if it goes down like that. Remanding the case for further proceedings will give everyone a heads-up that sonmething may be amiss, and allow the masses to prepare themselves for a further ruling on the case.
Obama has admitted/asserted that he had British citizenship at birth through his father and hthus at birth held 'dual citizenship'.
Since his mother could not legally pass U.S. citizenship to him in 1961--since she had not been in America for five years past her 14th birthday; she was eighteen when he was born--Obama's assertion that he held duial citizenship at birth is factually fraudulent and he knows it. Thus he is lying and trying to promote himself for affirmative action promotion outside of Constitutional requirements.
Obama and his media sycophancy are promoting this affirmative action candidate as 'president elect'. There is no such title. The effrot is designed to astroturf the bastard into office. David Axelrod is a consummate 'astroturfer'. [For those in Rio Linda, astroturfing is a deceitful way to fabricate a plausible poseur; Axelrod made his reputation on such deceits in corpoprate America.] Do we really want such an arrogant prick being the president?
I’ve been reading everything, someone is saying, not me, that that argument about her not living 5 consecutive years after her 14th birthday probably does not in fact apply to her circumstances. I believe the poster said this was written more in terms of foreigners who come here. It may be wrong but that seems to be one of the weaker arguments. Now, there are so many threads on this topic.
Many thanks, LucyT
Ping
Just to clarify, that statute (if it is applicable at all) would only be relevant if Obama was born outside of the US. If he was born in Hawaii, then that law makes no difference- he is a natural born citizen regardless of his mother's or father's age or citizenship status.
OK then.
4. December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986
If, at the time of your birth, both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship with no conditions for retaining it.
If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. There are no conditions placed on retaining this type of citizenship. If your one U.S. citizen parent is your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules apply if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time. If legitimation occurred after November 14, 1986, your father must have established paternity prior to your 18th birthday, either by acknowledgment or by court order, and must have stated in writing that he would support you financially until your 18th birthday.
Thanks: this issue of immense importance is taking up too much of our attention. Come the 5th, it’ll be good to see the wheels of justice start moving. Too much endless discussion, I have gotten headaches reading all of these websites.
The above IS the story.
Unfortunately the "Woodward and Bernsteins" of our day are themselvs playing defense for Obama.
THEY are the one's that need to be investigated.
But who is there to investigate the "investicaters?"
That only leaves us (with limited resources) to get information -- that the MSM is doing their best to suppress -- out to the general public.
Thank God for the Internet.
STE=Q
LOL. It should!
Too much endless discussion, I have gotten headaches reading all of these websites.
Control yourself, FRiend. Stay off the offending websites and keep your sanity. Nobody is forcing you to read or converse, right?
And what happens if the Supreme Court doesn’t agree..., in that they don’t want to upset the election...?
Anchor baby is a term that refers to kids born in the US to illegal alien parents. Obama's mother was a US citizen and his father was here legally, so the term anchor baby is not accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.