Obama’s Friends Working to Amend the Natural Born Citizen Requirement

Count us Out ^ | 11/28/08 | staff

[Lilpug15]

Ping! This is interesting & Scary!

[Taichi]

Like Clinton in ‘92, Obama’s youthful run could have been thought to be his national preparation for a subsequent, winning run
**********************************************
I have had the same thought. He didn’t start out to win this one and now he has to cover his back side.

[Westlander]

Jennifer Grandtheft is prominent eh? I guess you could call her that. Governor of a state thats #1 in unemployment and 2 billion in debt.

[chicagolady]

James David Manning PHD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJc6uczdhE0

Boom Chaka Laka Brother!

[tophat9000]

It's been the PUMA dem that have lead all the way on this and they deserve to be commended

[LucyT]

Thanks, Lilpug15.

It’s-always-something Ping.

[Major Matt Mason]

Although some of the reasons for maintaining the natural born citizen requirement are rational, many of the reasons are based primarily on emotion.

If there are rational reasons for this, Ms. Herlihy, then what is the problem? The first part of your sentence renders the second half moot. If there exists perfectly good reasons for this clause, then leave it alone and obey the law. She sounds like a typical, liberal baby boomer/shyster. This group is destroying this nation.

[WalterSkinner]

[HollyB]

Very intersting info, thanks for your research and hard work. But, one thing - No info is showing up on the listed link:

http://www.kirkland.com/sitecontent.cfm … temID=7845

[BIGLOOK]

To change the Constitution of the United States requires 75% approval among the states.

I learned that in jr. high school.

[TADSLOS]

Just tying up loose ends...

[Doug TX]

You may be correct, but it seems the logical first step in this process is to release pertinent information/documentation.

The reason why its not a conspiracy theory is because its easy to debunk if the person releases the documentation. Since he has refused, it creates the aura of a conspiracy or something to hide. Easy to resolve if he cooperates.

[Deepest End]

Without an authentic Certificate of Birth how do we even know his mother is an American citizen? On whose word do we base the “fact” that Stanley Ann Dunham was his real mother? George Soros perhaps?

[BIGLOOK]

So if you have an American mother and no legal father then they will argue that the requirements of the Constitution are satisfied no matter where Obama was born.

Well.... that bastardized argument ought to play well in the court of fairness.

[Iowan]

Thanks, LucyT

Save the Constitution Ping.

[top 2 toe red]

Sure...uh huh, someone on obama’s team wants Arnold for President. Pleeeze...

[GiovannaNicoletta]

bookmark

[rawcatslyentist]

>"Where is the sorry dang creepy Main Stream Media? Even Fox News?"

They're busy preparing the daily serm0n, and whoreship services for the next day.

[real_patriotic_american]

Hummmmmmmmmmm! I’ll second that.

Also, you can’t change the rules after the game starts. The Democrats are at it again.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244

[InterceptPoint]

"Well.... that bastardized argument ought to play well in the court of fairness."

The left doesn't play fair. In fact they play very unfair.

But they are winning the arguments with an American population who's sense and knowledge of history is declining rapidly, partly because of immigration and partly because of a failed public school system. I'm not supporting their argument. I don't believe it is valid. But I think it will win out in the end. The Supremes may take the case and define "natural born citizen" in the manner I described or, simply make the same argument in their "conferences" and refuse to take the case. Either way we lose, the Constitution loses and the Dems win.

Like I said - I hope I'm wrong.