Posted on 11/22/2008 11:54:21 AM PST by SgtSaunders
This week, newscasters reported that al Qaeda's #2 terrorist disparaged the election of Barack Obama, and hurled racial slurs at Obama himself. "The report has not been confirmed by the State Department," they all said, but they reported it anyway. Last week, Fox News reporter Carl Cameron told viewers that three "anonymous" insiders of Sen. McCain's campaign said that Sarah Palin was, in essence, a diva and a dunce. He - and dozens of others who picked up the story on other channels - never identified, or even verified, the sources of the quotes, but they reported them anyway. Contrast these shabby examples of "journalism" with the legions of identifiable, verifiable and credible sources who for months have been investigating the disturbing allegation that Barack Obama is ineligible for the presidency because he has failed to meet one of the three requirements that the U.S. Constitution mandates, specifically that he provide proof of his "natural born" U.S. citizenship. What follows is a partial list of people and organizations that have challenged Obama's eligibility. Further on I will comment on how egregious the media's failure to cover this story has been. And last, I will speculate on the reason for the cover-up of this full-blown scandal.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
One of my primary reasons for believing that Obama was born in the U.S. as opposed to Kenya is that like me, he would have encountered slight problems in his life as a result of not being born in the U.S.
For example, in my case, being an American born overseas, I have had quite a few problems due to the fact that I was not born in the U.S.
First, when I was 8 I was almost deported from third country because the country of my birth and the country of my citizenship did not match.
My mom had difficulty enrolling me in public school because the idiot processing the admissions to a public elementary school did not understand that a person born overseas could actually be an American.
When I was in college I had lost my ID and was instead carrying my U.S. Passport when stopped by the local PD. I showed him my Passport and the officer saw that I was not born in the U.S. which brought him to the conclusion that I was an illegal alien with a forged document. He brought me to the local jail where I sat in an INS holding tank until the DA looked at my paperwork and cut me loose.
Being around the same age as Obama, my point is that he also would have encountered problems as a result of not being born in the U.S.
From your post to God’s ears. Perhaps the supremes will decide to protect our constitution if the man is not eligible. And if he goes down for lying and trying to subvert the constitution...a whole lot of democrat leaders are going to go down for aiding and abetting the whole fraud!
If they find him ineligible, imagine the explosion. And if they shift it to Congress...I don’t like to think about that outcome. First, I think , suits would immediately be filed all over the place so to speak, hampering his already questionable ability to govern. The fraudulent BC would be a poster, bumper sticker, in blog designs, but aside from all that millions of people would be convinced he was illegal—and mils of others would defend him. Even if he tried to appoint judges/justices, repercussions would follow.
No- it was definitely Oct 30 Thurs or I’m really thinking Oct 31 Fri and as I stated previously right at outset of show.
In a way my point is being made. Obviously many fans heard him a week before as you have sent and went and sent many emails in between. He had a different tone.
I don’t have membership and can only pick n choose from avail articles. I took a quick look but wonder if his intros to any show before 1st break (before taking up a defined subject) get transcribed or put on podcast anyways. I know nothing on such.
I just googled Rush Limbaugh Obama Birth Certificate and came up with that transcript, and it is the one I remember hearing from Oct. 23rd.
It would be a crisis alright, but I’d rather go through riots than have our constitution subverted and trashed. Imagine if you will, that the truth doesn’t come out until after he has served for a year or so. Any treaties or laws that he signed would be invalid, every order he had given our military would be ‘criminal’ and now subject to the international courts(not that I believe in the IC, mind you), every appointment would be nil and void. It’s a nightmare scenario for sure, but one that HE,the DEMOCRATS and the MEDIA would have brought on this country for not vetting him and/or covering up for him. It would be the biggest scandal and fraud perpetrated on the American people since our founding.
Yes! On top of the fact that his ‘election’ was by outright theft! I am so worried that the High Court will shift this to Congress or the Electors—a different playing field w/the liberal atmosphere.
Has there ever been a question about eligibility before? Most, if not all in the modern era (when birth certificates existed at all) were clearly over 35 when they took office. They had long records, with a few exceptions, and in many cases long family histories of service to the nation, or at least in public life. Few, if any, "came out of nowhere" like The One, and so there was no doubt that they had resided in the US for 14 years. AFAIK, there was never any evidence or indication that any of them were born outside the country of a non citizen father, either. (There were *candidates* who were born outside the country of citizen parents).
This case is pretty unique.
Both of whom, in contrast to the Court, have actual political and Constitutional responsibility for the election results.
No he did not. He either was born in the US, or he never had US citizenship, except perhaps via naturalization. Either way, no citizenship, or naturalizatioin, he's not eligible to the office of President. This is because his father was a noncitizen, while his mother did not meet the then existing residency requirements. He needs to have been born in the US to be a natural born citizen.
If he was "born in the USA", then why is he going to such much bother to avoid providing his BC to various courts?
Because the only people asking for it are his bitter enemies, and he wants to give them the finger.
NO duly constituted authority has asked for this. NONE.
IF that occurs (and I think that's very, very unlikely) AND if he can't produce it, then that's a real SHTF scenario.
So far, it's just VRWC nutroots noise.
... It seems odd that people would be fired for snooping into a U.S. Passport File that did not exist.
Even a diplomatic passport requires an application and thus produces "files"
But was it a US Passport(possible), a Kenyan one (doubtful) or (most likely), an Indonesian one?
Lots of people fit that category. But BHO cannot. He was either born in the US, or he's not a natural born citizen.
That Passport lists Obama’s place of birth.
Damned if I know. I was working on the address which was listed in the birth announcement and although I was loath to do so I had remembered it mentioned that the family had gone on walking tours when his father visited in 1971. I have the pdf of the book and had to read through it to find the information I was looking for.(which was difficult to do as my computer doesn’t like pdf’s) He described his arrival in Hawaii in 1970 and mentioned he was waved through immigration after he showed his passport. Do you mean I have to read through the book again to find out if he mentions which country the passport was issued by? It’s very unlikely it would be as simple as reading that to find the answer. I was simply lucky he did mention that the first house his grandparents lived when they moved to Hawaii in was within walking distance of the apartment on Beretania Street! As we know very little he wrote about in his book is based on reality but on what he wants to be reality! In his arrogance he did write about that house not thinking anyone would ever think it important.
What a cliff hanger! Democraps—but if they become participants in this fraud—federal fraud, bigtime—; even if they did give their OK, the Chief Justice can and I think will refuse to swear him in! OK, let’s just say “should refuse”...
Berg is a Democrat. A Hillary supporter it's true, but still, a Democrat. IIRC, the guy who filed a suit in Hawaii is a Dem, and pretty much a nobody. Many of the other state level suits have also been filed by ordinary citizens, not anyone important enough to be his "bitter enemies".
NO duly constituted authority has asked for this. NONE.
Notice I mentioned *courts*. They are certainly "duly constituted", but so far he's sent his lawyers to argue why he should not produce the documentation or why those asking have no "standing" to ask for it.". It should would be cheaper to just provide the documenation. Of course it's not *his* money that's being spent, it's that of all those folks who used the untraceable debit cards to "donate" through the web.
While it's been the tradition for the Chief Justice to swear in the President, it's not required by the Constitution. In fact there's no requirement that anyone swear in the President. But he does need to swear the oath (Art II, Section 1, last paragraph) , as do other federal, state and local officers and officials (Art. VI, 3rd paragraph) He should already have sworn the very similar oath when he became a Senator, but I've read that many Congress Critters neglect to sign the documentation. (You try that and you'll never be a 2LT or Ensign, or even an E1)
If it came to that, I'm sure Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg would do the job, if she could stay awake long enough. Then she'd resign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.