It's also easier to see the missing "of's" from STATE of HAWAII after doing edge detection.
Posted on 11/12/2008 2:04:27 PM PST by Amityschild
This is like a Grisham novel. A tangential but delicious point -- it may very well be in Clarence Thomas's hands. When the Mansourian plant was asked on Pastor Rick Warren's Saddleback Political Forum, who he would not have nominated for Supreme Court Justice, Obama said "Clarence Thomas". He then went on to denigrate Thomas's intellect ("not a strong enough legal thinker or intellect"). The plant is not fit to wipe Thomas's boots. I hope the plant is sweating. Bwahhaahahahahahaha. BTW, I found Obama's racism against Thomas (he calls everyone against him a racist so why can't I do the same?) appalling. John Bolton, the intellectual's intellectual, has called Clarence Thomas "an outstanding Supreme Court Justice".
(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...
No one is forcing you to participate.
Consider it a last ditch effort to save our sanity as we watch our country sink into the abyss of a full welfare state complete with economic collapse and the reduced to rubble as we are forced into global socialism.
Some are busy stocking their pantries.
Some are out gun shopping or stocking amno.
Some are erecting fences around their property.
Some are squirreling money to transfer out of USA.
And some of us are trying to DQ the man who will capitulate America, *F* the Constitution, and destroy our lives.
So yes, today, there are a number of choices.
Last month “this was a trap’ and he was going to whip it out November 2 from his dying mother’s hands” and make a fool of all that challenged his authenticity. Never happened.
Today it’s a distraction from hell.
On the contrary, it will keep us alert for those things, and might, just might, prevent them. Not likely I'm sure, but it's all we've got for now.
On the contrary it was independents, and a slightly higher turnout among Dims that did it. The independents saw "free stuff" and "free stuff light". They picked the real deal, not the echo.
Speaking to Mr. Bickell a few minutes ago, I asked him what happened to my letter informing me of the first disposition back on Monday Nov. 3rd when he decided not to pass the Stay Application on to Justice Souter. To this he replied, "That wasn't a disposition so I didn't have to give you any notice." Incredible. He disposed of my case illegally and then said that since it wasn't a proper disposition I wasn't entitled to notice thereof, and certainly not by "appropriately speedy means". Sabotage.
//////Stinking conservatives who sat home got O elected////////////
You got that right!!
The perfect elitist Conservatists, just capitulated America to Marxism.
And thank the lily white pure & perfect who would pick apart even Reagan (he was divorced, ya know) for not voting in 2006. Thanks for our complete loss of power in 2006 and marginalizing Conservatism into a smalller & smaller percentage of the electorate.
Stinking independents. The stock market obviously has zero confidence in Obama.
I’m sorry, but I don’t believe Ingraham has any interest in this case. My listening of her show the last few months and nothing about this case. She’s been silenced by someone as has Rush, Hannity, & Levin. Savage had a long segment with Berg however.
Their silence is speaking for them. One thing is for sure...the Ayers, Wright, Rezko angle did nothing for them. The Berg case can, but they are not interested....bad for next 4 yrs business. (who to trust anymore?)
>>>Of all the Justices, I think Thomas is the most likely to follow The Constitution to the letter, but I doubt that it is in his hands. It is probably still in Souter’s.
No... it’s in God’s hands.
[Circa 1830's] The abolitionists were at first widely denounced and abused. Mobs attacked them in the North; Southerners burned antislavery pamphlets and in some areas excluded them from the mails; and Congress imposed the gag rule to avoid considering their petitions. These actions, and the murder of abolitionist editor Elijah P. Lovejoy in 1837, led many to fear for their constitutional rights.New York State abolished slavery in 1827, but that just made the slavery situation someone else's business. Not proper to discuss in polite society for many years. In fact, it may be that slavery has never been proper to discuss in common polite discourse. Part of the problem with 'rascism' and many other 'pc' issues is that we don't discuss them in general public discussion. We have discussion groups -- in the 1830's they were discussion societies and clubs. But those are not the common discourse.http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0856464.html
Savage is on screaming about the fairness doctrine. He did have Berg on his show. He should try to get Leo on his show.
The rest appeared to have backed down.
New York State abolished slavery in 1827
-
No, slavery took a new form, became more inculsive. Wage slaves of all ethnic groups evolved in New York garment Warehouse sweat shops, etc. They didn’t want to discuss this abuse either.
Yeah, I remember a boss who spoke of touring a printed circuit board assembly line in NYC Chinatown circa 1973, he said they were locked in to the room — Chinese women, set to their worktop labor with tiny components. Like the Triangle, he said, as I recollect.
I’ve been praying ...
Remember how many times these people said, "Why don't you talk about the real issues in this campaign?" "It's his real birth certificate, so why don't you get over it?"
And the same people who originally said these things never stopped saying them four months later?
And the same self-proclaimed yahoos who fancied themselves thje gods of graphics did everything they could to prevent my research findings from being acknowledged as accurate?
Well, I have a message for them all.
No logic will be needed when Obama, his Campaign and Annenberg (via Factcheck) not only conspired to commit fraud, but actually are guilty of fraud when they created forged images and and forged photographs and, with malice aforethought, did falsely represent them to the American public as genuine copies of Barack Obama's Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth, in a blatant attempt to defraud and disenfranchise the American voter that they were choosing a person qualified to be POTUS, and thereby rob the other qualified candidates for POTUS of their fair and equitable share of votes. Folks, it makes no difference if you rob a bank with a real gun or a toy gun because robbery is robbery, no matter by what means the perpetrator uses to make his victims think that deadly force will be inflicted if they do not cooperate.
The evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible, that, if not for the heinous fraud of passing off a fake birth certificate solely intended to convince voters into believe that Obama was a natural-born US citizen, the outcome of this Presidential election would have been entirely different.
Which part of THAT ISSUE don't people understand? People will say that this is a history-making election, but hidtory
Agree about the first, but not the second. The factcheck photos are photos of a real artifact. Some of the photos may be doctored, but #5 is the one that needs to be explained. The real artifact in photo #5 was created somehow and that's what needs to be explained: how was it created?
heinous fraud of passing off a fake birth certificate solely intended to convince voters into believe that Obama was a natural-born US citizen, the outcome of this Presidential election would have been entirely different.
You are wrong about that, the tipping point of the election was the markets. After the carnage in October, Obama could have come out and said "I was born in Kenya" and people would still have elected him.
It's called, "Managed crisis," and it is exactly what he and his Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac cronies engineered. Throw in ACORN voter fraud and intimidation, and the entire media industry totally in bed with Obama, makes the election seem like a foregone conclusion.
Except that if people knew what was on Bambi's real birth record during the primaries, Hillary would have won, hands down.
#5? That's an easy one.
Next, import #5 2 into a graphics program and either choose the circle drawing tool, or the circle selection tool. Draw a circle around the Seal.
Guess what?
YOU GET A PERFECTLY ROUND CIRCLE.
Exactly, how is that possible when the paper is slanted down and from the camera lens, and is also folded at a 30 degree angle right through the top of the seal?
Also, look at the Seal in #1, #2, #7, and #8. The word, "of" as in STATE of HAWAII is missing. Compare my photos and scans of a real COLB Seal, where you will see the words, "STATE of HAWAII," clearly shown.
Sorry, but there is nothing "real" about these photos in relation to Obama.
I agree with the managed crisis plus voter fraud = Obama win.
It's also easier to see the missing "of's" from STATE of HAWAII after doing edge detection.
When you look at photo #1 under edge detedction, it appears as if the entire middle of the Seal has been scratched out (whioch pretty much hides the missing "of":
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.