Posted on 11/12/2008 11:53:59 AM PST by Plummz
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - CLERK'S OFFICE CONTINUES SABOTAGE OF NJ CITIZEN STAY APPLICATION FOR 08 ELECTION - YOUR HELP IS REQUESTED
Dear Citizens of the United States of America,
I need your help and the US needs your help.
My case, LEO C. DONOFRIO v. NINA MITCHELL WELLS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY - US Supreme Court Docket # 08A407 - continues to be subjected to misconduct by the US Supreme Court Clerk's office, particularly by Mr. Danny Bickell, the Stay Clerk.
For a full review of the Judicial treachery in this case, please review the entire UNORTHODOX PROCEDURAL HISTORY of the case.
It has come to my attention today that the US Supreme Court's Stay Clerk, Mr. Danny Bickell, has continued to list this case incorrectly thereby preventing it from ever crossing the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas.
The Docket of the case fails to mention that the case went directly from the Appellate Division in New Jersey to the New Jersey Supreme Court which is the nexus that allows the case to be properly before the US Supreme Court. The Clerk's office appears to be doing everything possible to see that this case never gets to the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas or any of the other Supreme Court Justices.
I have an order handed down from the New Jersey Supreme Court which makes reference to the Appellate Division case as well, but the US Supreme Court Clerk's office refuses to acknowledge the NJ Supreme Court's review and it is that review which allows my case to go before the US Supreme Court. The Appellate Division case avoided the Constitutional issue, but the NJ Supreme Court decision raised the Constitutional issue when it specifically said in its order of denial that it had relied on "movant's papers" while at the same time it made no mention of Judge Sabatino's Appellate Division order and opinion.
The NJ Supreme Court specifically relied upon "movant's papers" in their order denying emergency relief and "movants papers" focused on the "natural born citizen" issue.
Here is the decision of the Honorable Justice Virginia A. Long:
"This matter having come before the court on an application for emergent relief pursuant to Rule 2:9-8, and the undersigned having reviewed the movant's papers and the papers filed by the defendant in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, it is hereby Ordered that the application for emergent relief is denied."
The US Supreme Court Docket fails to mention the NJ Supreme Court decision and that is completely wrong and improper. This case continues to be subjected to Judicial/Clerical misconduct and it's time that US Citizens, be they Democrat, Republican or 3rd party affiliated, stand up and order that the Clerk's office of the highest Court in the land STOP interfering in a case that is rightly before the US Supreme Court.
This is unprecedented in that the Clerk's office at the SCOTUS appears to be injecting politics into the handling of paperwork properly before it. It will be a terrible blow to the separation of powers if Supreme Court review can be stopped by Clerks imposing their own political views on litigants who have properly followed legal procedure. I call on all US citizens today to call both the Clerk's office and the Public affairs office and to complain about the way this case has been handled. Please call them.
US Supreme Court Clerk's Office - 202-479-3011
US Supreme Court, Public Information Office - 202-479-3211
More important though, is the necessity that Justice Clarence Thomas and the rest of the Supreme Court receive direct mail letters (not e mail) bringing this case Docket # and the URL of my blog to their attention. You may write to Justice Thomas at the following address:
The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
One First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20543.
--------------------------------
Please include the docket # 08A407, and a link to this blog
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
If you write to Chief Justice Roberts, please make sure the envelope is addressed to
THE HONORABLE JOHN G. ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Thank you,
Leo C. Donofrio
Oh absolutely NOT! Your interpretation of Natural Born citizen defies common sense....as well as the law.
Citizenship isn't automatically conferred based on the parents' citizenship.
When was Luna admitted as a state? Is this one of Barry 0 ‘s secret extra seven states?
John / Billybob
If Thomas reviews it, wouldn’t that at least be headline-worthy? First black SCOTUS justice reviews eligibility of first black POTUS-elect?
This is a 5 million dollar headline for somebody, don’t you think?
Yes. In fact, you can call as well. (202) 479-3011. Press 5 to speak to a clerk. Ask for Danny Bickell, Stay Clerk. The case is #08A407. I simply asked him how he handled the case and he told me exactly what he did with it.
Scroll to the bottom and see what Jody posted on November 12th at 3:16 p.m
I did exactly what Jody suggested, in calling the Stay Clerk.
Sir it would help if you could explain in layman’s lingo how his case is “a dead duck”. I for one have no law degree and now can’t even find my copy of the Constitution. Thank you—but I fail to understand why we the people have read and heard and have been taught in school from maybe K3 that it is the Law of the Land including US born only for Pres and now you say in short we are the Land of the ..Lame. ?
we need to rally at the SCOTUS. if Jesse jackson can get a rally going in 5 minutes why can’t we?
I doubt it. Everyone in the MSM knows about it now, but won’t dare write about it. Just like Larry Sinclair.
Except that Thurgood Marshall was the first black Supreme Court Justice.....
Sir it would help if you could explain in layman’s lingo how his case is “a dead duck”. I for one have no law degree and now can’t even find my copy of the Constitution. Thank you—but I fail to understand why we the people have read and heard and have been taught in school from maybe K3 that it is the Law of the Land including US born only for Pres and now you say in short we are the Land of the ..Lame. ?
Right you are, sorry, forgot about him.
Why is it a dead duck - because Scotus is giving him the run around? Short answer. What about Berg’s case?
Is there anything we can do? You said you were on a high level conference call about these cases.
Let's hope more people forget about him.
49 USC 1401 contols who is, or is not, a citizen at birth.
So, you’re saying SCOTUS has never granted an emergency stay that a state supreme refused?
This case is very unique procedurally.
Bill Clinton knows O is not a citizen. Looks like the GOP has no interest in defending the Constitution. It seems like Leo and Berg are trying. We have legal beagles here who said these cases are being discusssed by some people above us avg folk but they say the cases are doomed??? :-(
Aw, geez. Why do we have to keep going over this sh!t again? Don’t any of you bother to read the ooodles that have been written about the law at the time? Hint there was a 5 year time requirement involved, according to the laws at the time, and she physically could not have met it.
Yeah..you are right. This is the most important issue now. We have apparently elected a usurper and people are still not seeing it for what it is. Tinfoil and black helicopters have nothing to do with this.. This guy maybe an illegal alien. He must be forced to show his cards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.