Posted on 11/12/2008 11:53:59 AM PST by Plummz
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - CLERK'S OFFICE CONTINUES SABOTAGE OF NJ CITIZEN STAY APPLICATION FOR 08 ELECTION - YOUR HELP IS REQUESTED
Dear Citizens of the United States of America,
I need your help and the US needs your help.
My case, LEO C. DONOFRIO v. NINA MITCHELL WELLS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY - US Supreme Court Docket # 08A407 - continues to be subjected to misconduct by the US Supreme Court Clerk's office, particularly by Mr. Danny Bickell, the Stay Clerk.
For a full review of the Judicial treachery in this case, please review the entire UNORTHODOX PROCEDURAL HISTORY of the case.
It has come to my attention today that the US Supreme Court's Stay Clerk, Mr. Danny Bickell, has continued to list this case incorrectly thereby preventing it from ever crossing the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas.
The Docket of the case fails to mention that the case went directly from the Appellate Division in New Jersey to the New Jersey Supreme Court which is the nexus that allows the case to be properly before the US Supreme Court. The Clerk's office appears to be doing everything possible to see that this case never gets to the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas or any of the other Supreme Court Justices.
I have an order handed down from the New Jersey Supreme Court which makes reference to the Appellate Division case as well, but the US Supreme Court Clerk's office refuses to acknowledge the NJ Supreme Court's review and it is that review which allows my case to go before the US Supreme Court. The Appellate Division case avoided the Constitutional issue, but the NJ Supreme Court decision raised the Constitutional issue when it specifically said in its order of denial that it had relied on "movant's papers" while at the same time it made no mention of Judge Sabatino's Appellate Division order and opinion.
The NJ Supreme Court specifically relied upon "movant's papers" in their order denying emergency relief and "movants papers" focused on the "natural born citizen" issue.
Here is the decision of the Honorable Justice Virginia A. Long:
"This matter having come before the court on an application for emergent relief pursuant to Rule 2:9-8, and the undersigned having reviewed the movant's papers and the papers filed by the defendant in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, it is hereby Ordered that the application for emergent relief is denied."
The US Supreme Court Docket fails to mention the NJ Supreme Court decision and that is completely wrong and improper. This case continues to be subjected to Judicial/Clerical misconduct and it's time that US Citizens, be they Democrat, Republican or 3rd party affiliated, stand up and order that the Clerk's office of the highest Court in the land STOP interfering in a case that is rightly before the US Supreme Court.
This is unprecedented in that the Clerk's office at the SCOTUS appears to be injecting politics into the handling of paperwork properly before it. It will be a terrible blow to the separation of powers if Supreme Court review can be stopped by Clerks imposing their own political views on litigants who have properly followed legal procedure. I call on all US citizens today to call both the Clerk's office and the Public affairs office and to complain about the way this case has been handled. Please call them.
US Supreme Court Clerk's Office - 202-479-3011
US Supreme Court, Public Information Office - 202-479-3211
More important though, is the necessity that Justice Clarence Thomas and the rest of the Supreme Court receive direct mail letters (not e mail) bringing this case Docket # and the URL of my blog to their attention. You may write to Justice Thomas at the following address:
The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
One First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20543.
--------------------------------
Please include the docket # 08A407, and a link to this blog
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
If you write to Chief Justice Roberts, please make sure the envelope is addressed to
THE HONORABLE JOHN G. ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Thank you,
Leo C. Donofrio
Huh?
Interesting, even if I don’t know all the legal “ins and outs” of the procedures...
Yeah, and we should throw in a complaint about the Bildergergers and the Council on Foreign relations as well.
UPDATED: 2:10 PM: Leo C. Donofrio was just contacted by Mr. Danny Bickell, Stay Clerk of the United States Supreme Court as a direct result of Mr. Bickell receiving phone calls from the public. THREE ISSUES WERE DISCUSSED:
1. He is now in the process of correcting the Docket to reflect that my case is before the US Supreme Court from a direct ruling of the NJ Supreme Court wherein a Constitutional issue had been raised.
2. Mr. Bickell informed me today that after he decided, improperly, not to pass on my Emergency Stay Application to Justice Souter on Nov. 3rd, that he did not owe me any special notification of such disposition of my case according to his interpretation of Supreme Court Rule 22(6) which states:
“6. The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application.”
Mr. Bickell insisted that by “appropriately speedy means”, the Court Rule only demands he use ordinary mail. I then asked him how is that different from the ordinary means by which you notify litigants as to the diisposition of their cases? And he replied, “It’s the same.” And I said, then how is that by “speedy means”? And he said I wasn’t entitled to a phone call or anything else. And I said, “Then it’s your official position that Rule 22(6) calls for nothing more than the same notification as an ordinary case and that the words “appropriately speedy means” really have no special meaning at all. And to this he replied, “That’s my official position.”
3. Mr Bickell has informed me that my renwed Application for an Emergency Stay will be submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas on the day it is received. He also requested that people stop calling him, and I told him that these people are just citizens, I don’t know who they are, and I can’t command them to do anything but that they are watching the Supreme Court’s actions and they want to see that Justice is done in this case, and Justice pertains not just to the substantive case but to the procedural aspects as well under the Supreme Court Rules which have not been followed so far as to this case.
ping
“Someone should get this to Jstice Thomas’ wife at Heritage Foundation”
I think someone should get this information to my cousin at Long and Foster Realators.
Should we keep calling?
Somebody needs to run with this. I think thing may be breaking. If SCOTUS starts to see more heat - citizens may get some attention. What about Savage or Hannity or Beck. Do any conservative talk radio show hosts or the GOP have any guts anymore?
Drudge? Any big web sites? Newsmax, WorldNet? CNSNews? Atlas Shrugs has it but she needs to post how Leo is getting the run around.
Leo Donofrio is awesome.
ping
Corruption at every level.
BRAVO!!!!
I just posted the update for information purposes only. I wasn’t aware of this lawsuit but it seems to me that the phone calls did work to get the attention of the clerk. Now maybe Justice Thomas may actually see this.
Where is the GOP? Where are our conservative talk show hosts and web sites? We need to flood SCOTUS with calls.
bump
Did people post this to Hannity’s message boards, email Atlas Shrugs, NEwsmax, WorldNet Daily.
If Leo does not get an affirmative answer by tomorrow from Danny Bickle that his correctly filed case is not handled then we start a national phone call campaign.
BUMP!
Bickell doesn’t want phone calls?
The chutzpah!
Except the Bilderbergers aren’t running for POTUS and and refusing to produce a birth certificate.
Mr Danny Bickell seems like a real piece of work.
Where is the GOP? Quivering in the corner like the capons they are.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.