Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/10/2008 7:30:28 AM PST by Invisigoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Invisigoth
2008 : Globe Trotters vs. the Generals

For a moment we thought there was a real game on ...
2 posted on 11/10/2008 7:31:54 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

R’s lost for multiple reasons. I’m quite surprised how the nationwide admitted fraud has immediately vanished as a factor.


3 posted on 11/10/2008 7:33:23 AM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth
What do you expect when the Republican candidate was the most liberal of the pack to run during the presidential primaries?

McCain had one issue during the primaries: the surge, which he supported, worked.

When he got the the general, he couldn't get a handle on anything else to run on, and Iraq was basically done, so it wasn't even an issue.

McCain stumbled around, trying to find some issues. He even switched a few of his previous positions. But McCain lacked a convincing, defined message to the voters. So, Obama easily painted him as just a Washington insider extention of the Bush Administration.
4 posted on 11/10/2008 7:36:01 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth
Missouri - Still the Bell Weather State.

John McCain took Missouri for one reason alone- Sarah Palin.

The GOP Gubernatorial candidate, at the same time, got his clock cleaned? How can this be? He is a Congressman and a DC insider.

The lesson is that reformed Conservatism is a winner.

5 posted on 11/10/2008 7:39:19 AM PST by 11th Commandment (General Secretary Barak Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

I still have no clue what McCain’s message was supposed to be. Seemed like he never found one.


6 posted on 11/10/2008 7:39:58 AM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

Not a conservative, too old.


7 posted on 11/10/2008 7:42:26 AM PST by truebluetexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

As a reminder we all know what happened.

After supporting illegal’s and ‘fine gold’, and other dimwitted legislation there were too many conservatives that don’t trust McLame.

Those moves seemed like catering to the left for political gain.

We all knew this before he got the nod.

And most of us an FR knew he couldn’t win as a result.

Obama I think actually helped us more than a more moderate candidate but there was no way for conservatives to trust McLame again.

Boy were we ever RIGHT ABOUT THIS ONE.

Him jumping on the bailout reminded us why we didn’t like McLame in the first place. He is a ‘Big Government” Republican.


8 posted on 11/10/2008 7:47:51 AM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

Bologan...we lost because the nation was tired. Simple as that. This was not a referendum on Republicans or Conservatives.

Most are not informed on the issues...hell...something like 40% of adults don’t even pay any income taxes...they don’t care...they don’t read, they are not informed...they just want “hope”.

So that’s what they elected.

And now it’s my “hope” that we can stop the “basta*d in his tracks.


9 posted on 11/10/2008 7:56:53 AM PST by HappyinAZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

“The choice the voters had during the general election was to vote for a liberal or vote for a far-left-wing liberal. There wasn’t a conservative Republican on the ballot for president.”
____________________________

Pretty well sums it up.


10 posted on 11/10/2008 7:57:53 AM PST by cowdog77 ("Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth
Most people saw zero progress with topics such as the energy bill between Repubs and Dims. McCain had lots of good plans, none of which would ever see the light of day. The next four years would have been just as stagnant as the last.
12 posted on 11/10/2008 8:22:34 AM PST by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Invisigoth

This is total garbage.

It doesn’t matter if Obama had been running against Spongebob, Americans chose a Marxist over the alternative.

ANY Republican should have beaten Obama, had Americans truly been willing to resist the siren call of the welfare state.

It is delusional to think if we just had the right candidate, who said all the right things, then he or she would magically get elected.

Americans chose a Marxist. If that’s what they want, or a willing to risk to somehow feel good about their vote, NO Republican, of any stripe, could have dissuaded them from that pursuit. The American people are without excuse. This one is 100% on them.

The knew, or had the opportunity to know, what Obama is about and they voted for him anyway. That is all.


13 posted on 11/10/2008 8:23:57 AM PST by fightinJAG (Who needs the Fairness Doctrine? Obama admits the power to tax is the power to destroy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson