Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS SOUTER TELLS OBAMA TO PRODUCE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DECEMBER 1 (Unconfirmed, see thread research)
Atlas Shrugs ^

Posted on 11/07/2008 6:47:37 PM PST by mnehring

This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.

Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box?  Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that  disqualifies Obama from the office of the President.  What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.

Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.

The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas

If The Supreme Court Decides…?

At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.

If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.

"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."

Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: bc; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; hi2008; judiciary; obama; obamagate; obamatransitionfile; ruling; scotus; souter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-707 next last
To: mnehrling

This seems every bit as valid as API.


21 posted on 11/07/2008 6:55:47 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Think their “under pinnings” are made of brass or uncooked dough? With the exception of maybe 3, I think the rest will give nobema a pass and become president.


22 posted on 11/07/2008 6:56:15 PM PST by tillacum (Let's find conservative veterans who really know how to fight for this country, next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Id wait to see what API says about this


23 posted on 11/07/2008 6:56:35 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
From World Net Daily:

U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter has rejected an emergency appeal for the court to halt the tabulation of the 2008 presidential election results until Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama documents his eligibility to run for the office, according to an attorney who brought the action that challenges the Illinois senator's standing in the race.

However, the issue isn't going away, at least for now, since Souter set a schedule for a response from Obama to the challenge from attorney Philip J. Berg.

As WND reported, Berg brought his claims to the Supreme Court after a federal judge dismissed his lawsuit alleging Obama is ineligible to be president because he possibly was born in Kenya.

The judge concluded Berg lacks standing to bring the action.

The 34-page memorandum that accompanied the court order from Judge R. Barclay Surrick said ordinary citizens can't sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.

Instead, Surrick said Congress could determine "that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution's eligibility requirements for the Presidency," but that it would take new laws to grant individual citizens that ability.

"Until that time," Surrick says, "voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring."

In a statement today, Berg said he was told by a clerk for Souter that his application for an injunction to stay the election was denied. But he also said the defendants "are required to respond to the Writ of Certiorari" by Dec. 1. Read article.

24 posted on 11/07/2008 6:57:22 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

PLEASE GOD, MAKE IT SO!!!


25 posted on 11/07/2008 6:57:31 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...

Souter? My BS meter runneth over. My hope quotient rises.


26 posted on 11/07/2008 6:57:34 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
This should have happened before the election...better now than never.......
27 posted on 11/07/2008 6:57:49 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Anyone have a SCOTUS link to verify this? Such a thing would be a most unusual move by a justice.


28 posted on 11/07/2008 6:57:56 PM PST by Klepto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

One thing I just noticed at AtlasShrugs is a misspelling in the headline. It says, “Nirth Certificate”. Simple typo, or ??

The article itself goes on to talk about the “birth” certificate.


29 posted on 11/07/2008 6:58:35 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Are you depending on the presstitutes of the screaming media to produce this???? They won’t.


30 posted on 11/07/2008 6:58:46 PM PST by tillacum (Let's find conservative veterans who really know how to fight for this country, next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Just making a note. Here is the SCOTUS docket for Berg’s case, 08a391

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a391.htm

& 08570
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

Both denied by Souter.


31 posted on 11/07/2008 6:58:56 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Klepto

See 31
Half true but can’t find the disclosure demand.


32 posted on 11/07/2008 6:59:45 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Klepto

only source i can find is Berg’s website

and that does not post the Souter order...but references it

http://www.obamacrimes.com/


33 posted on 11/07/2008 6:59:58 PM PST by kralcmot (my tagline died with Terri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Klepto

I am hoping it is true but it seems highly unusual to require a piece of evidence that is the crux of the case before you even decide whether to hear the case?

I don’t know how these things operate but it doesn’t make sense.


34 posted on 11/07/2008 7:00:24 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Holy cow.


35 posted on 11/07/2008 7:00:38 PM PST by txhurl (obama elected president? holy cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The certiorari orders from the 6th and 7th don’t have anything on this.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/08ordersofthecourt.html


36 posted on 11/07/2008 7:01:38 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Whoa!!!


37 posted on 11/07/2008 7:01:38 PM PST by rintense (I don't wanna gain the whole world and lose my soul~ TobyMac (are you listening Obamabots?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Klepto

Great, President Biden.

Stand up Joe!


38 posted on 11/07/2008 7:01:43 PM PST by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

SCOTUS better take this seriously, because OBAMA WILL NOT WAIT AROUND for conservative judges to retire of their own volition.


39 posted on 11/07/2008 7:02:15 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
This seems every bit as valid as API

Please... make it stop...................
40 posted on 11/07/2008 7:02:27 PM PST by Phoenix11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson