Posted on 10/09/2008 12:56:02 PM PDT by bs9021
No Loophole Left Behind
by: Bethany Stotts, October 09, 2008
Just as the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act was passed under bipartisan leadership, so too criticisms of its flawed structure span the gambit of political persuasions. As previously documented, opposition to the NCLB provisions on annual yearly progress (AYP) and school sanctions have raised significant ire from some conservative policy analysts such as Michael J. Petrilli and CATOs Neal McClusky, as well as representatives from the progressive National Education Association (NEA).
Daniel Koretz, Harvard Professor of Education and author of Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us, recently explained why he believes standards-based testing can yield bogus and absolutely worthless scores which provide little practical value to society.
We send kids to school so that they will acquire skills and knowledge that they can use in the workplace and in later education; we dont send them there to score well on tests, he argued at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) this September. So if you prepare kids for tests in a way that give them skills that generalize to the real-world context, then youre doing the right thing and test-based accountability is working as it should be.
When somebody here hires kids out of school, they dont really care whether they came from Maryland or Virginia, and theyre not gonna ask did you do okay on the Maryland test but not the Virginia test, they want to know if they know math.....
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.