[Polarik]

Check out FactCheck's deception

[Polarik]

Ping!

[itsPatAmerican]

One reason is it cost money to serve data. 2mb is big. Just saying, you know, there are valid reasons for the swap. Carry on.

[PLMerite]

The COLB is meaningless.

I want to see a certified copy of his 1961 Birth Certificate.

[TheNewPundit]

As the smartest person in this forum, I’ll just leave you kids to your continued stupidity. If I do continue to say brilliant things regarding this issue, I will just have a few more retards try to tell me I was never in the Marine Corps despite my offers to allow them to come view my dd214, a few more retards will tell me I’m not a conservative disregarding my very conservative blog, a few more retards will tell me that Obama owns factcheck despite the fact that this isn’t true, and a few more retards will tell me that their investigative team has proven a scan to not be an original despite the fact that if something is scanned that means it isn’t an original and it can’t be used to verify if the document that was scanned is real or forgery.

Don’t invite me into these things if you don’t want me to continue to make fun of you.

[Velveeta]

I’d say you’re over the target.
Well done.

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[Polarik]

Need a major ping on this one. For immediate release.

FactCheck's virtual admission of fraud!

First of all, I want to let everyone know that I have uploaded ALL of FactCheck's original high quality, large file size photos that they secretly and swiftly swapped with crappy, puny file size ones. Click on this album link to see the original photos

Next, take a look at the list of FactCheck's photos in the upper left-hand corner of their web page, Born in the U.S.A., and take notice of their original file sizes and hyperlinks that they have not rewritten.

Shown below is a spreadsheet that lists, for each of FactCheck's photo files, the original file name and size, the current file size, the dates that I downloaded each of them, and the percentage of file compression applied to each of the original files.



By subjecting the original set of COLB photos to these extreme percentages of file compression, without also reducing the image sizes, what you get are photos that look as large as the original ones, but are blurry, fuzzy, and totally useless for detecting any detail in them,

detail, that someone like myself, just might use to prove that FactCheck intentionally altered their photos and scan image to perpetuate a fraud on the American public.

I'd like to point out THE most important statement that FactCheck made, and that still exists, in their "Born in the USA" story:

You can click on the photos to get full-size versions, which haven't been edited in any way, except that some have been rotated 90 degrees for viewing purposes.

On the basis of this statement alone, FactCheck has just shot themselves right in the head. This is not an "inconsistently" in their story, but a death blow to it.

Your Honor, the Prosecution has just begun to rest its case.

[Calpernia]

Polarik rocks!

BTTT!!!

[Poser]

Two words: Band Width.

[longtermmemmory]

BUMP!

the MSM will not report the coverup.

[AliVeritas]

ping

[sinanju]

He’s doing late-stage, drugged-up Elvis!

[justiceseeker93]

I note at least two obvious problems with the Fact Check presentation, which tend to be obscured by their use of the low resolution blowups.

(1) One cannot make out any wording whatsoever along the periphery of the raised seal. That raises the issue of whether a phony raised seal was applied by someone outside the Hawaii Health Dept.

(2) On the blowup image of the seal, with supposed 90 degrees rotation of the document with a view to the left, the printed lines form a different spacing pattern than they do on the whole (alleged) COLB. That suggests that the seal image may have been applied to a different document.

One more issue: the use of a "signature stamp" by the registrar (actually a stamp with a boilerplate (alleged) certification of authenticity and the registrar's signature underneath that certification). Such stamps can easily be made to order - from Staples, say - by a fraud artist, assuming that the signature of the official can be copied or traced. And even if such were an legit stamp ordered and posessed by the state government, that would have been a foolish move on the part of the state, since since such an "official" stamp could be stolen and used to "authenticate" fraudulent documents ad infinitum, or at least until the perps are apprehended.

[Polarik]

RE: all the "excuses" that FactCheck posted smaller files of its photos to save bandwidth.

If that were even remotely true, then why do they still have the 1.5MB image of Obama's bogus COLB posted on their site three and one-half months later??? If "millions of people have already downloaded it," then by the same logic as the apologists for Obama, they should have removed it by now

GOTCHA!