here, here
Well, maybe MSNBC will, but any of the news orgs that aren't directly on his payroll.
Obama is the wolf in sheep’s clothing. He only projected that image against women, the way muslims always do it.
He is a muslim f@g pig with lipstick on, let us face it. His muslim brand of male homosexual feminism and hatred of women is blatant.
We got our miles worth out of the lipstick. I want to see more STAND UP CHUCK. SHOW EVERYBODY WHO YOU ARE. Priceless!
The train’s in motion:
“Women are now waving their lipstick in solidarity with Sarah at massive rallies on the campaign trail - not in victimhood, but in defiance.” — Michelle Malkin
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2080245/posts
Gees...and all along I just thought he was an empty suit.
After watching Obama oh-so-subtley give Hillary the finger...
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=69JVgf0ioq8
& watching the crowd’s response, it looks like the same kind of thing with that lipstick remark. And this crowd ‘got it’, too!
Let's just be thankful that McCain or Palin has not been prone to common phrases such as "Let's call a spade a spade" or "Black (or Dark) Humor"..., etc.
Quite frankly, Obama's comment, while it may have been a "Freudian Slip" was, probably just ill-conceived! It doesn't matter! Elections are won or lost by "soundbites" which influence the electorate (rightly or wrongly)! You never get elected by OVER-estimating the rational thought process of the voters!
This has been true for thousands of years and I don't expect it to change anytime soon!
One would have thought that the Clinton impeachment might have taught Democrat politicians to steer clear of any reference to “lips”...
The “smelly fish” comment is worse than the lipstick one.
I give him a pass on “sweetie” — no big deal.
There is a big difference between calling a woman ‘sweetie’ and calling a woman a pig. (by implication)
If someone talked to my wife like that he’d be in need of dental work.
Maybe I’m old-fashioned.
STE=Q
Charles Krauthammer commented on Fox News last night the crowd behind him interpreted it as directed against Palin. Looking at the replay of it, they absolutely believed it was referring to Palin, they jumped up and applauded loudly right after the lipstick comment.
I think plenty of women sure knew how to interepret the comment and that’s why he started with his lame explanations shortly after.
What I have yet to hear or read from any of the leftist bloggers and drive-by media pundits is the fact that McCain and others have used the phrase “lipstick on a pig” to refer to a bad legislative bill or an inanimate object. Obama clearly was referring to Gov. Palin and the people in the audience who were present when he uttered the remark. This distinction is quite clear in my mind and yes, it is clearly indicative of Obama’s sexist and arrogant attitude.
I heard that on Letterman he said “the pig was McCain and the lipstick was Sarah” ... grrrrrrrrrr
On Television - before he went on David Letterman’s show - Barack Obama said “enough” about “lipstick on a pig.”
Then he goes on David Letterman’s show and talks more about it - and for quite some time.
Why didn’t he tell Letterman “enough!” ?
You see, Hillary never said anything close to “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.”
Sarah Palin did. Obama’s comments were an attack on Sarah Palin, and his “cold fish” comments following these were meant to attack the part of Sarah “Barracuda.”
When Obama said “enough,” it was for everyone else - not for him.
That’s why some call him Barack Obeyme.
I don't believe Obama knew what he was saying - but if you watch all the dems sitting there - dems who starting cheering and whooping it up - THEY “got it”.
And they were tacky.
Obama should have reacted quickly and said, “no, I'm not talking about Sarah”. But he was taken aback by the uproar too. Obama does classic Freudian slips - like his “muslim faith” comment - he gets rattled - and the "slips" break through his cool.
obumpa
