Sarah Palin for VP !! -- McCain is "baggage" on the ticket !! :BY: FReeper, David Osborne

David C. Osborne ^ | 30 August 2008 | David C. Osborne

[davidosborne]

For the record I voted for Sarah Palin in the FR poll, but was disapointed that only 40% of FReepers agreed with me.. I would like to see a new FR poll asking how many FReepers are happy with Sarah Palin.. I bet it would be 90% ---- the same as her approval rating in Alaska.... and soon to be her approval in the USA !!

On another note I wonder if anyone is making bumber stickers that say Vote for Sarah PALIN for VP... because come November that is what I will be doing... John McCain is tha “baggage” that comes with that vote.. and then in 2012 we (THE GOP) can regroup and consider are options at that time.. but for now.. I am fully on board with Sarah Palin as VP ——

now.... here is a line I have not used in a while

TOWARD VICTORY !!!

Note New Tag Line

[rabscuttle385]

National security trumps all other issues. America is at war, which of the two candidates do you want in charge?

You're right. We are at war...with Islamist terrorists. But we are also in an undeclared de-facto war on our southern border with organized crime groups, including coyote smugglers, drug cartels, and others. The fact that the Mexican government is basically impotent doesn't really help the situation. And, the fact that our Government has basically stood by and done nothing the entire time has expanded this undeclared war to practically every State and Territory of the United States.

The latter is just as important as the former, and so far, on this issue, McCain has done nothing to help the cause of the United States and has done much to hurt the cause of the United States, especially with regard to the amnesty bill that he jointly sponsored with Sen. Kennedy of Massachusetts, though he has said much in an attempt to placate and to cajole nervous conservatives into voting for him. (Of course, it can be argued that his actions were part of an attempt to open a new market—Mexico and other Central and South American nations—to U.S. commercial interests, but those sort of shenanigans have been going on since the antebellum period of U.S. history.)

A critical job function of the President is to enforce the laws of the United States, as passed by the Congress. Now, allow me ask you this: If McCain has advocated allowing millions of foreigners to break our immigration law, then how can we trust him to enforce other laws? And, if he can not uniformly enforce the law, how can he even fulfill the functions of the office of President?

[SoConPubbie]

You desperately wanted to play Ronald Reagan in your 3rd grade drama production didn't you?

When was that, last Fall?

There you go again, my friend. In case you haven't noticed your posts are getting less and less civil.

Have you run out of ammunition?

[death2tyrants]

“All that matters is that is was corrected”

Where did you originaly get this accusation from? Why are you afraid to discuss your false accusation against McCain in detail?

[mkjessup]

If McCain has advocated allowing millions of foreigners to break our immigration law, then how can we trust him to enforce other laws? And, if he can not uniformly enforce the law, how can he even fulfill the functions of the office of President?

Can we trust President Obama to do better?

[mkjessup]

There you go again, my friend.

Another tree dies due to global warming from your excessive hot air, yes indeedy, you has met 'pathetic' and he is you.

In case you haven't noticed your posts are getting less and less civil.

Finley Peter Dunne said "politics ain't beanbag", you ain't seen nuthin' yet.

Have you run out of ammunition?

For the likes of you, I don't need much ammunition at all. You've got a bullseye painted on nearly every body part.

[rabscuttle385]

Hunter initially endorsed Huckabee. He now endorses McCain.

Hunter is a politician. So is Huckabee. And so is McCain.

Do you trust any politician, regardless of what letter follows his or her name?

(Hopefully, the answer is no.)

*PING* to rabscuttle385, just to say 'BITE ME'. LOL

Okay, whatever.

After the election, remind me to sponsor a Freeper party (not a political party) so we can all just drink and forget about how we're going to get screwed by whomever wins.

[SoConPubbie]

Apparently, so did Duncan Hunter. You have already stated that if it somehow turned out that Obama winning was due to your NOT voting for McCain, your position would basically be "so be it", that reveals an enormous, indeed a monstrous ego throbbing away inside you, what it suggests is that you live such an inconsequential and impotent life that you crave that kind of power and influence, to actually "be the one" to put "The One" into the White House because John McCain didn't kow tow sufficiently to your ideological purity test.

Not at all, my friend.

I simply will vote my conscience and it is up to John McCain to earn my vote. When he changes his positions on the following issues, I will be the most pleased Republican and will gladly devote myself to his election:

1. Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
2. Carbon Cap-and-Trade system
3. Embryonic Stem cell Researh

It is really quite simple, we live in a country that has a system where the politicians work for us, they represent us, if they want our votes.

I am not asking John McCain to change much of his positions, only those that involve steadfastly and strongly held positions by a majority of the base of the GOP. Furthermore, they are positions involving morality, ethics, and principles.

This should be a simple task for John, and as I have stated earlier, he has plenty of time to do this between now and November.

[SoConPubbie]

Can we trust President Obama to do better?

No, but what is your point?

You get the same bad result from both.

[death2tyrants]

You claim that ‘And in no situation do I want Obama to win’. Since the only way Obama can lose is if McCain wins, this means that under no situation do you want McCain to lose, correct? Your statement nullifies your qualifiers, making your post nonsensical.

[SoConPubbie]

Apparently, so did Duncan Hunter. You have already stated that if it somehow turned out that Obama winning was due to your NOT voting for McCain, your position would basically be "so be it", that reveals an enormous, indeed a monstrous ego throbbing away inside you, what it suggests is that you live such an inconsequential and impotent life that you crave that kind of power and influence, to actually "be the one" to put "The One" into the White House because John McCain didn't kow tow sufficiently to your ideological purity test.

Wow, I just re-read your post.

Are you really sure you were a staunch Duncan Hunter supporter?

It really is hard to tell after reading something so phrased in the sentence structure of the left.

[rabscuttle385]

Can we trust President Obama to do better?

No, but that's still not reason to vote for McCain, who will do a job just as terrible as Obama when it comes to border security and immigration (i.e. national security).

The reason I am pissed off is because this year the GOP served up a rather liberal portion of fresh, steaming (with the flies and everything) pile of horse crap and didn't even try to disguise it as real meat...and then told me to eat it.

At least with Bush, it looked like real food.

And I am quite sure that many of my fellow McCain dissenters will agree with me on this.

[dixiechick2000]

David...as much as I respect you...please stop it.

You’re not helping the conservative cause at all.

We just got the best news that we could possibly get.

So...please stop it.

[death2tyrants]

“source was an article posted here on FreeRepublic”

What article? Do you have a link? A title of the article in question? An excerpt?

[rabscuttle385]

You’re not helping the conservative cause at all.

Well, he's certainly not helping the Republican/RINO cause...whatever that may be.

[skr]

I might go for

McCain/Palin-Earmark Killer!
Obama/Biden-Baby Killers!
If you have to think about this, please don’t vote.

[mkjessup]

I simply will vote my conscience and it is up to John McCain to earn my vote. When he changes his positions on the following issues, I will be the most pleased Republican and will gladly devote myself to his election:

1. Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
2. Carbon Cap-and-Trade system
3. Embryonic Stem cell Researh


It is really quite simple, we live in a country that has a system where the politicians work for us, they represent us, if they want our votes. I am not asking John McCain to change much of his positions, only those that involve steadfastly and strongly held positions by a majority of the base of the GOP. Furthermore, they are positions involving morality, ethics, and principles. This should be a simple task for John, and as I have stated earlier, he has plenty of time to do this between now and November.

I'm going to write them and encourage John McCain to PLEASE change his positions on:

1. Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
2. Carbon Cap-and-Trade system
3. Embryonic Stem cell Researhc


So you will hopefully just shut your freakin' piehole.

Why don't you just write in your own name this November 4th, and then you can elect an imaginary 'friend' that will HAVE to account to you for all of their actions, ok?

[SoConPubbie]

You claim that ‘And in no situation do I want Obama to win’. Since the only way Obama can lose is if McCain wins, this means that under no situation do you want McCain to lose, correct? Your statement nullifies your qualifiers, making your post nonsensical.

No, apparently you are not keeping up with the thread or are just slow of comprehension. Let me repeat for you real slowly.

I do not want Obama to win, he is bad for our country, he is a Marxist. I do want McCain to win, IF, and it is a big IF, he chooses the right positions, the correct positions from a conservative and moral position on the following issues:

1. Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
2. Carbon cap-and-trade system implementation
3. Embryonic Stem-Cell research.

It is quite simple, I will not vote for somebody supporting this positions, period.

If he wants my vote, he will do the right thing on these issues.

[mkjessup]

Can we trust President Obama to do better?
No, but what is your point?
You get the same bad result from both.

So it is your position that it doesn't make any real difference whether one votes for McCain, or votes for Obama?

[SoConPubbie]

What article? Do you have a link? A title of the article in question? An excerpt?

I can try. Let me see what I can do.

[mkjessup]

Apparently, so did Duncan Hunter. You have already stated that if it somehow turned out that Obama winning was due to your NOT voting for McCain, your position would basically be "so be it", that reveals an enormous, indeed a monstrous ego throbbing away inside you, what it suggests is that you live such an inconsequential and impotent life that you crave that kind of power and influence, to actually "be the one" to put "The One" into the White House because John McCain didn't kow tow sufficiently to your ideological purity test.
Wow, I just re-read your post.
Are you really sure you were a staunch Duncan Hunter supporter?


Go back and read my past posts supporting Hunter, ok numbnutz? Take your time, you seem to be a little sloppy when it comes to research.

It really is hard to tell after reading something so phrased in the sentence structure of the left.

"sentence structure of the left" = anything that hits a raw nerve with 'SoConPubbie'.

"infantile" = anything or anyone that conflicts with 'SoConPubbie'.

Like I said, consider getting some professional help, you sound like you've got a persecution complex.