Posted on 08/11/2008 6:49:41 AM PDT by Victory111
Muslim terrorists and their apologists insist that violent jihad is a justifiable reaction to their targets support of Israel. Since China is most definitely not an ally of the Zionist entity, how will Islamist apologists spin the jihadist attacks that have marred the Beijing Olympics?
Uighur Islamic separatists killed eight people during a rash of suicide bombings on August 9, in the latest in a series of brazen terrorist attacks inside the communist police state. Terrorists targeted a dozen government offices with home-made explosives, just one day after the Turkistan Islamic Party released a video threatening to attack public transportation during the Games.
(Excerpt) Read more at crossactionnews.com ...
Outstanding article by Kathy Shaidle. Thanks for posting.
Especially since China is more than happy to sell them weapons?
There's a point here that everyone's missing: THEY don't espouse violence, but they support those who do espouse violence.
LOL...it’s going to be poetic justice watching China battle against its clients and the very people it arms (Islamists in Iran, Iraq, Taliban, Sudan, etc.).
IMO, it’ll be more fun than watching Saudi fight the people it rains and arms. And speaking of Saudi, if the communist regime thinks of the obvious source of most of the violence, I doubt China would have any compunction whatever about invading Saudi and taking it’s oil.
Hey, anything that slows China from turning the entire world into their food pan/ sweatshop is fine by me. Let the Manchu flail about with the Jihadist.Why should they get a free pass?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.