Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

He has given up nearly all his furniture, and done all the other things one does to complete a move and does not feel he should be forced to move again simply because his new bride has decided she does not like him after all. Who is right here?
1 posted on 08/03/2008 10:11:37 AM PDT by Virginia Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Queen

He should get a lawyer.

Once they became married, their spousal home became their common domicile. He is not a tenant “with benefits”. If he moves out, he is probably screwed, not in the way he hoped

When they divide the property the divorce court will decide his rights in her house, and her rights in his house.


2 posted on 08/03/2008 10:18:08 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Queen
Interesting aspect in Virginia law is that there's "premarital assets" and "marital assets". He still owns his house free and clear. He also owns the rent he derives from the house.

I'd say right off hand that he leased his own "premariatal" asset and he, alone is responsible for that piece of business. That is, it has no bearing on what's going on in the marriage or its breakup.

The lucky bride has the same rights. The place he's living in is hers.

He's not a "by rights" or "by fee" tenant ~ just an "at will tenant".

She should call the sheriff and move him out to the sidewalk ~ (after a brief stop in court to get an eviction notice). She doesn't even need to file for divorce to control her premarital property. He has little recourse unless he's unemployed, handicapped, pregnant and nursing an existing child.

Virginia is the place folks in Maryland move to before they get divorced so this question was all the time getting raised at work. Working in a building with over 160 lawyers with little to do but kvetch over legal minutiae, even the lay people (the rest of us) get apprised of how this works.

There's been some modification of Virginia divorce law so that any children of the marriage are cared for first (and that child support get paid to a former spouse stuck in the People's Republic of Maryland). Otherwise, this is the place to go (for a divorce) on the East Coast.

3 posted on 08/03/2008 10:25:03 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Queen

Anyone who would try to stay where they’re not wanted is, well, not a person I’d want to associate with. It’s just common decency.

Another thing to think about: If wifee gets too upset at hubby, she could file charges about abuse. You say there’s a kid in the house?

If it were me, I’d get the hell out of there.


6 posted on 08/03/2008 1:22:08 PM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Queen

She’s just going to call the cops and say he hit her. He’ll never own a gun again.


7 posted on 08/03/2008 1:24:14 PM PDT by donna (Pres. Bush: Pardon Ramos and Compean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Virginia Queen

He’s technically a tenant, and tenant law would apply.


9 posted on 08/03/2008 1:57:31 PM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson