Posted on 07/31/2008 11:47:43 AM PDT by enewsreference
PART II of our discussion of John McCain's Military Years. A blogger raises the issue of Affirmative Action:
Did McCain Receive Affirmative Action?
McCains military record is fair game
The War Secrets Sen. John McCain Hides
FACT SHEET: Military record of John Sidney McCain III
McCain's Military Record Shows He Is Unfit To Be President
McCain's Secret, Questionable Record
Flummoxed By Vietnam Vet, McCain Falsely Claims He Received Every Awars...
Is McCain's War Record Fair Game?
Does John McCain's Military Record Really Qualify Him to Be President?
McCains Spotty Military Record Is Declared Off the Table - And Obama Appears to Accede
(Excerpt) Read more at enewsreference.wordpress.com ...
Is Obama’s “military record” fair game?
Its appropriate to ask whether McCains shoot-down was caused by bad luck or simple incompetence on his part. Of course, there is no way to answer definitively. But we can form an assessment based on the rest of McCains military record. At the Naval Academy, McCain graduated almost bottom of his class. He was 790th out of 795. McCain lost many aircraft over the course of his military career five in total. Most pilots who lost aircraft at the rate McCain did would have been kicked out of the service. But McCain had protection from up on high. His father was an admiral. He was an untouchable. So McCain blundered his way through his military career until he was finally shot down.
Incompetent & Unlucky - not the best qualities in a fighter pilot.
By the accounts of those there with him, he served honorably, even heroically while he was captive.
That makes up for a whole lot of arrogance and whatever ineptitude he had in getting there.
Look, I do not think McCain is a good conservative candidate. Quite the contrary. it is a shame and disgusting that we are left with the options we have...but I have looked into his military record, and done so with a skeptical eye and I will not try and discount him over it. He served, he was injured, wounded, tortured and imprisoned for that service.
...and despite my severe misgivings about quite a few critical conservative issues he has betrayed his base on, yet he does hold some conservative issues that we can maintain during his administration. Compared to Obama, with McCain's military background, his commitment to the war against Islamic Jihad, his pro-life position (such as it is), there is really no comparison to the absolute marxist that Obama is.
The word is spelled: privilege
And 47,200 hours in an enemy prison camp.
Who is the assclown who wrote this?
I want to see the OP’s military record. I would also like to see a similar discussion on Obama’s teaching carreer seems he was an intellecual lightweight even as a prof.
I believe that McCain has the best interests of the United Sates of America at heart. He is flat-out wrong in some of his policy positions but not all. Barrack Hussein Obama does not, IMO, have the best interests of the United States of America at heart and is wrong on virtually all of his policy positions. McCain is the obvious choice.
This is appalling to me. How long do you have to spend in combat to be considered a hero? There were plenty of young American heroes who died on beaches in places like Normandy and across the Pacific that spent a some total of 2 seconds in combat. Personally, I don't think it's "appropriate to ask whether McCains shoot-down was caused by bad luck or simple incompetence on his part." That is, unless he's going to be flying his own Airforce One if elected. His combat service speaks to his willingness to serve his country, and his captivity to his courage and resolve. His judgment on issues that he would affect as president can be gleaned, and has already been demonstrated by his leadership on the surge. The rest is just a bunch of meaningless armchair generaling by people who weren't there, and feel they can pass judgment on someone who suffered enormously on behalf of his country.
ping
I strongly dislike the man as well.
But his election is more important than my dislike of The Maverick.
This type of stuff really tweaks the MeCainiacs and that's just plain fun.
Gee, a "mere" 20 hours in combat. I'm sure I do not know how you distinguish "combat" hours from "waiting to get shot at" hours. Say loss rates "in combat" are 1 per hundred hours. That means you have about a one in five chance of being killed during those mere twenty hours. How may people would sign up for a job like that.
In World War II bomber crews were rotated home after 25 missions. I'm not sure Vietnam, with radar guided missiles and a period when MiGs actually out performed U.S. fighters was a whole lot less stressful.
This discounts the hazards not related to combat, like the chance of getting killed in a fire on the deck or when landing or taking off from a ship at sea.
The Aircraft carriers were just off the coast, it took maybe five or less minutes to be in the combat zone after takeoff. Many bomb runs in VietNam involved a small bomb load against a single target. Tim in combat is no measure of risk.
I think it’s a fair guess, though I haven’t got the data, that losses among aviators were higher than among infantrymen in Vietnam.
Oh, I don't recall any postings from enewsservice regarding
J F’n Kerry in 2004, do you?
If you are going to pimp your site, you should learn to spell properly.
Ever hear of something called emboldening the enemy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.