Posted on 07/23/2008 12:40:56 PM PDT by Polarik
bttt
bttt
bump
bump!
And don’t forget the recent brothel bust. Lou Posner funneled the monies from the porn events to an ACORN affiliate!
On the state levels, ACORN groups usually have different names. You have to really read up on the groups to see if they are ACORN affiliates.
They thrive off of using low income housing, which Obama just happens to have a PAC for (Hopefund).
One drop may be a tradition; but it is not a federally qualifying standard.
>>>Are you saying that the announcement is a forgery as well?
I know it doesn’t look right to me. But since I’m not a graphics expert, I don’t want to use the word forgery.
I do know Obama is an activist organizer (ACORN). And access to newspaper clipping creations is a standard activist tool. Just like the flashmobs.
It is probably easier to fake the birth certificate then the newspaper announcement, but if one supports the other it would be curious to see if it can be independently verified.
With Obama’s past record we shouldn’t be so quick to accept anything no matter what the source.
Got a question for you. With all this flap about the legitimacy of Obama’s citizenship, who in government is responsible to ensure that the Constitutional criteria for assuming the office of POTUS are met?
That clipping says Stanley Ann was married. This brings us back to the Barry Toot theory.
Stanley Ann was under 18 and would have needed written permission by her parents to marry. Unless, she had fake ID. Maybe that is why she was known in Kenya as Anna Toot. She had a relative in her family named Anna Toot.
whose s/b who’s
Need more coffee :)
The answer to “who’s responsible” is, it seems to me:
1) The voters
2) The members of the electoral college
3) The House and Senate, in receiving the votes of the electoral college
4) The courts, first by way of challenges to placement on the ballot, and conceivably by challenge to the outcome of the count of the electoral college.
I would rank them in about that order of desireability as a matter of constitutional principle, but your mileage could easily vary on that question.
marriage license, divorce decree, and COLB all tie into the original fraud that Obama must hide.
His mother was underage and single when he was conceived.
His Muslim Father had no legal right to marry his mother in this country.
They forged documents to get married with her name being Anna Toot.
That name is on his original Birth Certificate.
It was changed after the divorce and his birth certificate changed again when she married in Indonesia to put Lolo Soetoto as his father (perfectly legal in the case of a Bastard child adopted by a new husband)
Changed again to change the name to Barack Obama after he returned to the States, by his grand parents to feed his “african ancestry” ego (very cool in the early seventys).
What he is hiding is a trail of forged and legal documents that would make the most ardent believer wonder who the hell this guy really is if they were ever released in Masse.
Well, I’ve posed the question to my “go to guy” re the Constitution, CongressmanBillyBob, in post #111. Let’s see what he has to say.
Now trail lends an interesting thought. Because, if Obama is trying to portray himself as the Mahdi, that paper trail would show him inserting Muhammad to his name. That would show he is naming himself the Mahdi and would probably be killed for it by the true believers of the Mahdi’s return.
<[>"Are you for real? Why debate issues or anything with someone who may well be not qualified to run for Office? You stalling time for Obama?"
Law School 101 ..... when you have a weak case ... 1, first try to stall time ... 2, argue jurisdiction (read: tell your opponent it's none of his business)"
Or we can just roll over say, "We are sorry President Osama/Bama!
Just stop this stupid and outdated technicalities of who isn't qualified to run as president. In fact just cancel the Election. Osama/bama is now our FUERHER, er president for 8-10 years of what is left of our miserable lives under his rule.
The graphic below shows, the only difference between o-B-ama and o-S-ama is just a bit of B.S.
Not sure, PL.
Blacks vote approximately 90% Democrat.
The Obamassiah will likely get over 95% of the Black vote.
A statistical near-zero difference ???
I am NOT voting for McRINO because his opponent is black.
I would GLEEFULLY vote for a J.C. Watts type candidate
and in a heartbeat.
It AIN’T being black or NOT being black that makes any
difference to me. It is what is in the candidate’s HEAD
that drives my vote.
The thing that drives ME crazy is that my choice is between
some fool like McRINO and The Obamassiah. Now THAT’S crazy!
Bottom line in this election for me is do I want a Socialist
like Obama or a lousy RINO for Prez? I’ll take the RINO
this time around.
And hopefully the GOP get to choose our candidate next time
instead of the Democraps!
(I hope I said all that okay now). :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.