Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plot Thickens: Obama's Birth Certificate and HRS Section 338-18
Mitchell Langbert's Blog ^ | July 12, 2008 | Dr. Mitchell Langbert

Posted on 07/12/2008 9:24:08 AM PDT by Raquel

I have previously requested a copy of Barack Obama's birth certificate. Janice Okubo, Public Information Office of the Communications office of the State of Hawaii, responding on July 3, has chosen to refuse to provide a copy of the birth certificate. This blog consists of three parts. First, I quote Ms. Okubo's letter, dated July 3, 2008, verbatim. Her letter responds to my inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act. Although Ms. Okubo points out that the Freedom of Information applies to the federal government and not the states, most states, including Hawaii, have similar statutes. With respect to birth certificates, though, there is a separate section of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) that Ms. Okubo cites, HRS § 338-18. The link that Ms. Okubo provides in her hard copy snail mail letter respecting § 338-18 was dead when I tried to use it, but I obtained a copy of HRS § 338-18 from the Lexis-Nexis data base available from New York University's Bobst library. In addition, I obtained information on Hawaii's Uniform Information Practices Act from the State of Hawaii Website. In the second part of this blog, I respond to Ms. Okubo by drafting two letters, one a response to Chiyome Fukino, Director of Health, Ms. Okubo's superior, with a copy to Ms. Okubo and Governor Linda Lingle (R-HI), and also a letter to Barack Obama requesting that he send me a letter authorizing me to represent him in obtaining a copy of his birth certificate in the interest of avoiding accusations of political gamesmanship and manipulation. In the third section I copy the relevant sections from § 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes for your reference. I also quote from the State of Hawaii Website about its "Uniform Information Law" booklet.

(Excerpt) Read more at mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government
KEYWORDS: 2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; elections; expose; fraud; hawaii; issues; obama; obamatruthfile; unfit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: MindBender26

Check out post 60


61 posted on 07/19/2008 12:47:30 PM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president of the US should be at least a "Jackie Robinson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

So if I heard right that his sister has “two official birth dates”, separated by more than a year, this is also possible for baby barry.

Unfortunately, being born twice in two separate localities will only encourage greater worship by increasing his “godly” status amongst his simple-minded idolators.


62 posted on 07/19/2008 5:10:29 PM PDT by Gemsbok (blood -hound tasting fresh blood on the obamination trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Obama is toast. He is just buying time to figure a “gracious” way to back out, like an unexpected moderately severe car accident or health issue.

There is no way around this BC business. It is about as ridiculous as if Bush were refuing to release his tax returns.

Don’t worry, the Mossad already have all of this figured out and waiting to drop the bomb unless Obama quit first.


63 posted on 07/19/2008 5:23:44 PM PDT by m4629
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
>>>> Obama did NOT, I repeat, did NOT release his birth certificate until AFTER, I repeat, AFTER, he clinched the nomination. He left the HIllary camp sucking eggs on this one...Okay.. Got it?

Hillary and her forces, as well as those of the DNC at atleast three other entities were looking at this issue seven months ago.

They knew it was not an issue then. Got it?

Has certificate been phony and Obama not natural citizen, the “clinching” of the nomination would have been meaningless, since he would have been disqualified, regardless of when information became public. Got it?

64 posted on 07/19/2008 6:49:00 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus; Raquel

In March, 2007, the Chicago Tribune interviewed Susan Blake of Mercer Island, Washington, concerning a visit by Stanley Ann Dunham who was carrying three-week old baby Barry. (Susan and Stanley Ann had been best friends before the Dunhams moved to Hawaii.)

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/honolulu-seattle-roundtrip-in-61/

Texasdarlin’s blog has the videotape of the interview.

It seems airlines would not allow infants to travel on long distance flights. Poo filled diapers doing somersaults during turbulent conditions, not to mention squalling baby cries, were a factor in those days.

So, where was the Senator actually born? My bet is a home for unwed mothers in perhaps British Columbia, Canada.

And that is what I believe he is hiding. His maternal grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, is kept incommunicado ( forced or voluntary: I wonder!). Too bad, as she could answer these questions.


65 posted on 07/20/2008 2:59:37 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

It is not “idiocy” if he wasn’t even born in the U.S. or one of its territories. See my posting #65.

What was his mother doing on Mercer Island when he was three weeks old? She didn’t even know how to change his diaper. There were no direct flights between Hawaii and Seattle in 1961, and airlines wouldn’t allow small infants on airplanes then because of noise and sanitation factors.


66 posted on 07/20/2008 3:05:14 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

People don’t care about that at all. The circumstances of your birth isn’t as important as what you do with your life. That would be a terrific campaign message, but he isn’t going to use it.

There is something more, something that could delegitimize his candidacy, that he wants desperately to hide.

I suspect he wasn’t born in the U.S. I suspect he was born in British Columbia, Canada.


67 posted on 07/20/2008 3:08:40 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Correct. Barack H. Obama II may be a citizen BUT he wasn’t born in the USA nor in one of its territories. That would make him ineligible for the Presidency.


68 posted on 07/20/2008 3:10:14 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

<...This is not a subsidiary matter. It is of vital importance to a constitutional republic...I believe that he is, but that fradulent birth certificate does NOT prove it. Were he to win...and it is proven that he is not constitutionally “natural born”, the resultant fallout could trigger a civil war...>

Perhaps that, a civil war, is the intention of his big financial backers?


69 posted on 07/20/2008 3:15:04 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Stanley Ann Dunham a CIA plant? HaHaHaHa!!

She hated the U.S. She was a Communist sympathiser as a teenager in high school while living on Mercer Island. She had nothing to do with what happened in Indonesia. That was Indonesians killing one another. People around the world slaughter each other regularly, and have for many centuries, all without the CIA’s help.

Stop trying to lay the blame on the U.S. for other nation’s stupid, brutal acts.


70 posted on 07/20/2008 3:20:55 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Since 2004 there has been a concerted effort to hide Senator Barak Obama’s background and cover over his paper trail.

Records of his actions in the Illinois State Govt. have all been lost, just disappeared.

All his school records are sealed.

He won’t provide a birth certificate. His maternal grandmother, who could answer a lot of questions about her grandson, is held incommunicado, voluntary or otherwise, in Hawaii.

He’s never released a specific list of law clients, instead giving a list of all of his firm’s clients, numbering several hundred each year. His campaign will only confirm representation when the media comes to them with a specific case.

He won’t release his application to the state bar. He’s never released any legal or billing records to verify that he only did a few hours of work for a nonprofit tied to Tony Rezko.

He’s never released any medical records, just a one-page letter from his doctor.

This guy, with political ambitions his entire adult life, has either buried his paper trail or never left one.

As a lawyer, would you be really suspicious of an individual who goes to such great lengths to hide his past? I’m not a lawyer, but I’m very suspicious of this man.

I believe he must hide his past in order to be elected, and therefore cannot be trusted, period.


71 posted on 07/20/2008 3:52:05 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
What a strange response. The woman's Mercer Island experience occurred when she was still a callow teenage puke.

People change and grow. The CIA depends on such people ~ they're called ADULTS. Their recruits frequently work abroad under cover ~ often as USIA employees or as USAID workers. You might take a look at what those agencies do.

Now, concerning events in Indonesia, the blood letting was over by the time she went there - significantly she managed to to in Yogyakarta for a while ~ something I've heard is incredibly difficult for any non-native born person to get away with.

I suspect she "visited" Yogyakarta rather than having residence there. This is most likely an error that's been entered into her biographical material by her son or daughter, neither one of whom bothered to check the place out.

So, anyway, what's your beef? You have a problem here with Stanley Ann growing up and maybe actually doing something for somebody (in secret)?

Go tell your scrawny little friend Obama that his mommy was probably more complex than he imagines.

72 posted on 07/20/2008 4:49:13 AM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
“Hillary and her forces, as well as those of the DNC at at least three other entities were looking at this issue seven months ago.”

Consider this scenario...

The Clinton people may have discovered some truth about Obama, just too late.

Knowing full well that Obama had already clinched the nomination, and something as outrageous as his close connection with racist and hate monger, Rev. Wright, didn't shake Obama supports, the Clintons are waiting for the big bad Republicans to expose Obama.

Obama loses, Republicans look like the bad guys, and Hillary comes out smelling like roses ready to run in four years. Not too far fetched is it?

73 posted on 07/20/2008 5:03:03 AM PDT by Raquel (Read my commentary here www.raquelokyay.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Yeah, you obviously have an in with the Hillary camp.

Why did Obama release a fake birth certificate? What puspose did that sever him? Answer that so all of us can understand.


74 posted on 07/20/2008 5:59:52 AM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president of the US should be at least a "Jackie Robinson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Raquel

Just in case you have seen it yet- here’s Atlas Shrugs latest on the COLB:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html


75 posted on 07/20/2008 6:27:48 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

yeah I saw that.

it would be helpful if obama released his birth certificate.

fat chance.


76 posted on 07/20/2008 8:46:43 AM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
>>>>Why did Obama release a fake birth certificate?

The problem here, no one has ever answered the “who says so” question.

Who says it's fake?

That's the first question a good reporter asks.

To the best of my knowledge, no named person with excellent credentials has ever seen his real/supposed birth record certificate.

There are all these unnamed experts, but no certified experts, often called a “forensic document examiner” or a “questioned document examiner,” who has the credentials to be admitted to some real (not just a $20 membership certificate) document examining organization and who has been sworn as an expert witness in this field by a court (a reasonable set of qualifications) who has ever examined the original and pronounced it a forgery.

When AND IF that happens, we'll talk seriously about this.

77 posted on 07/20/2008 2:13:23 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

First thing a reporter (and lawyer) asks, “Who says so?’

In this case, other than inrternet rumor, who IN AUTHORITY says so to all the below

Since 2004 there has been a concerted effort to hide Senator Barak Obama’s background and cover over his paper trail.

Records of his actions in the Illinois State Govt. have all been lost, just disappeared.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO?

All his school records are sealed.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO?

He won’t provide a birth certificate. His maternal grandmother, who could answer a lot of questions about her grandson, is held incommunicado, voluntary or otherwise, in Hawaii.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO?

He’s never released a specific list of law clients, instead giving a list of all of his firm’s clients, numbering several hundred each year. His campaign will only confirm representation when the media comes to them with a specific case.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO? PLUS REQUIRED MANDATORY CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY

He won’t release his application to the state bar. He’s never released any legal or billing records to verify that he only did a few hours of work for a nonprofit tied to Tony Rezko.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO? PLUS REQUIRED MANDATORY CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY

He’s never released any medical records, just a one-page letter from his doctor.

WHO IN AUTHORITY SAYS SO? AND JUST LIKE CLINTON.

This guy, with political ambitions his entire adult life, has either buried his paper trail or never left one.

As a lawyer, would you be really suspicious of an individual who goes to such great lengths to hide his past? I’m not a lawyer, but I’m very suspicious of this man.

I believe he must hide his past in order to be elected, and therefore cannot be trusted, period.


78 posted on 07/20/2008 2:22:40 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

God, if you don’t see some major problems with the BC that has been released through Daily Kos, then this discussion is over.

I suggest that you go to the Obama Truth File... and start from the beginning and get up to speed, and stop wasting everyone’s time trying to explain to you what is obvious to everyone else..

End of discussion..


79 posted on 07/20/2008 4:27:55 PM PDT by nikos1121 (The first black president of the US should be at least a "Jackie Robinson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
So, in other words, you cannot provide the name of one person with decent credentials who has seen an original of this certificate who says it is a forgery.

You are depending on the Daily Kos?

You are kidding, right?

If you cannot provide the name of one credentialed person who has seen an original of the purported document and says it is a forgery, you are right. it is end of discussion.

BTW, Were you ever Dan Rather's researcher?

80 posted on 07/20/2008 6:03:52 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Leftists stop arguing when they see your patriotism, your logic, your CAR-15 and your block of C4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson