Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco’s Green Building Nightmare (Eco-totalitarianism run amok)
BeyondChron ^ | Mar. 03‚ 2008 | Randy Shaw

Posted on 06/28/2008 10:53:18 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo

The idea of “green” buildings is a terrific marketing concept. In San Francisco, it has helped grease the political roadway for massive, view-blocking luxury condominiums, implying that building these structures is more environmentally sustaining than leaving land vacant. Few seem to care whether green buildings can be a nightmare for those having to work inside high-rise structures lacking heat or air conditioning. The new Thomas Mayne designed Federal Building at 7th and Mission Streets in San Francisco is a case in point. Lauded by the New York Times as a building that “may one day be remembered as the crowning achievement of the General Services Administration’s Design Excellence program,” what some believe is the greenest federal building in the nation’s history also likely has the worst work environment. While architectural describe the building’s “sense of airiness” as “magical,” employees view working in this heat and air-conditioning free building with the wavy concrete floors and ceilings as a nightmare.

Green but Cold

Thomas Mayne’s new George H.W. Bush Federal Building now looms over midtown San Francisco. While people have sharply divergent reactions to its unique exterior design -- I happen to like it -- the verdict on the structure’s function as a office space for federal employees is nearly unanimous: it is a disaster.

Not that architectural critics care. Bedazzled by unusual design features and its focus on energy conservation, reviews of Mayne’s latest work seem to ignore whether it fulfills its functional role as a federal office building.

Based on what I have been told, it clearly does not.

The first fact about the building that may cause surprise is its lack of air conditioning or heat. According to Mayne, “a bike rack and air conditioning get you the same point. I’d much rather see BTU and CO2 requirements and let the professional community solve the problem.”

I apparently lack sufficient understanding of green technology, as it does not seem that a bike rack would “get you to the same point” in terms of keeping workers cool. In the real world on the 15th floor of the Federal Building, workers seek to relieve the heat by opening windows, which not only sends papers flying, but, depending on their proximity to the opening, makes creating a stable temperature for all workers near impossible.

When I spoke with a Labor Department worker at the building (who noted that she is encountering the type of bad work conditions that her agency is supposed to enforce against), she confirmed what might have been an urban legend: that some employees must use umbrellas to keep the sun out of their cubicles.

The lack of internal climate controls has left some workers too cold and others too hot. A happy medium has proved elusive. And while the managers’ offices do have heat and air conditioning -- a two-tiered approach fitting in a building named for Bush -- the “green” design apparently has messed with the effectiveness of these systems, leaving these top staff as physically uncomfortable as the line workers.

Dysfunctional Elevators

According to my source, architect Mayne has stated that federal office workers do not get enough exercise. To address this, he installed elevators in the building that only stop at every third floor. This requires employees to walk up or down one or two flights of metal stairs.

Persons with physical disabilities who cannot use stairs can use a separate elevator that stops at every floor. The foreseeable result is that employees seeking to avoid stairs use the disabled access elevator, leaving this car crammed with people and making the ride to the top extremely slow.

I am told that when the freight elevator is out of service, deliveries must use the disabled access elevator. It seems only a matter of time until a disabled worker sues the General Services Administration for providing inadequate disabled elevator access in the building.

Missing Cafeteria

Mayne’s desire to get workers walking may have impacted his decision to locate the employee cafeteria across the street from the building. Employees are not happy about having to leave the building just to get a sandwich, and were allegedly told that the building would include an on-site café.

But as is clear with every aspect of this testament to green buildings, this project was more a science experiment than a place designed to enhance worker productivity.

No LEED Approval

Green building advocates will no doubt argue that the Federal Building is a bad example, as it failed to secure LEED approval. According to its website, The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System™ encourages and accelerates global adoption of sustainable green building and development practices through the creation and implementation of universally understood and accepted tools and performance criteria.

Mayne noted that "I wasn't arrogant, but I was confident — I just assumed we had the platinum rating. All of a sudden we went through LEED and it wasn't working."

But the project’s failure to satisfy LEED’s scoring system is not the problem. Rather, it is that the federal government spent millions over budget to create a building that does not provide a minimally satisfactory work environment.

And the project’s huge cost overruns and functional inadequacies have apparently been ignored solely due to excitement over its “Green” stature.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: ecofreaks; environment; environmentalwackos; govwatch; greenbuilding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
There's a pic of the building at the link to the story.
1 posted on 06/28/2008 10:53:18 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Them GReens need to take a deep breath.. and hold it.. and hold it.. and ..


2 posted on 06/28/2008 10:56:28 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
And while the managers’ offices do have heat and air conditioning -- a two-tiered approach fitting in a building named for Bush

Nice little dig there, but it's much more representative of Communist systems, where Party insiders get extra perks that are officially forbidden to the rank and file.

3 posted on 06/28/2008 11:01:03 AM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf

ping


4 posted on 06/28/2008 11:02:17 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Them GReens need to take a deep breath.. and hold it.. and hold it.. and ..

Hehe. You're right -- the less they exhale, the less CO2 there will be in the atmosphere. They need to realize that their breathing is contributing to global warming, and make corrections.

5 posted on 06/28/2008 11:02:26 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Just like those horrendous low flushing toilets. Unlike the old style commodes, you actually wind up wasting more water having to flush multiple times.

...Tree Huggers are stupid. Period.

6 posted on 06/28/2008 11:03:52 AM PDT by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
And while the managers’ offices do have heat and air conditioning -- a two-tiered approach fitting in a building named for Bush

Even in an anti green story, gotta have that gratuitous Bush slam.

7 posted on 06/28/2008 11:05:36 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Not to defend the envirowackos, but doesn’t every office building have these problems? i.e. I think it’s very hot in our large office building, but the girl next to me thinks it’s always cold. The office building is all windows; once the sun gets low enough it is blinding. Our cafeteria is on the bottom floor which requires a walk of about 300 ft, a 3 minute elevator ride and a walk of another 500 ft. Seems pretty normal to me.


8 posted on 06/28/2008 11:05:48 AM PDT by loreldan (Can't vote for Obama, so rah rah McCain I guess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

An interesting and funny article about the stupidity of the greenies. Thanks for posting it.


9 posted on 06/28/2008 11:06:04 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (De-Globalize yourself !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
Original post here
10 posted on 06/28/2008 11:06:44 AM PDT by bornred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

The builing looks hideous, so it’s no surprise to find that the accomodations are little better than those of a stone age cave. Like 98% of liberal ideas, it’s a complete failure.


11 posted on 06/28/2008 11:07:52 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bornred

Didn’t show up in search.


12 posted on 06/28/2008 11:08:58 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
Few seem to care whether green buildings can be a nightmare for those having to work inside high-rise structures lacking heat or air conditioning.

Gawd, is this stupid. And wasteful.

Is building miserable, non-functioning, inefficient buildings really green?

I guess if green = anti-human, the answer is a resounding yes.

13 posted on 06/28/2008 11:13:50 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Quick search no, archive search yes. I guess the former only goes back a month or two so it is better suited to recent news.


14 posted on 06/28/2008 11:14:20 AM PDT by bornred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: T Lady

Once the workers out of desperation start bringing in little cheap fans and heaters and (assuming there are plugs) plugging them in all over the place, the energy used by that place will be a hundred times more than if they just efficiently climate-controlled the entire building.


15 posted on 06/28/2008 11:17:30 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
And while the managers’ offices do have heat and air conditioning -- a two-tiered approach fitting in a building named for Bush

And what's further stupid about this anti-Bush dig is that . . . did Bush design the building? Did Bush mandate buildings with no a/c or heat? Did Bush name the building?

What a complete hornswoggle.

16 posted on 06/28/2008 11:20:50 AM PDT by fightinJAG (RUSH: McCain was in the Hanoi Hilton longer than we've been in Iraq, and never gave up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo

Is this the same federal building that after construction was complete they discovered was in massive violation of the americans with disabilities act and other federal laws because the stairs entering the building did not have handrails, nor were there any wheelchair ramps?


17 posted on 06/28/2008 11:20:55 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo
New replacement Federal building...


18 posted on 06/28/2008 11:23:49 AM PDT by Coffee200am
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

“Like 98% of liberal ideas, it’s a complete failure.”

Not to liberals where intentions count as much, if not more than, results.


19 posted on 06/28/2008 11:25:16 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

yeah what was that dig about? did i miss something about bush the first? that he was a proponent of “two tiers”? went right over my head.


20 posted on 06/28/2008 11:29:13 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson