Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Bob Leibowitz
2 posted on
06/26/2008 7:27:46 AM PDT by
seanmerc
To: Bob Leibowitz
Praise God! Now how about the rest of our trampled rights?
3 posted on
06/26/2008 7:28:09 AM PDT by
Big_Harry
( Thank God I am an "Infidel"!)
To: Bob Leibowitz
So all DC has to do is not issue licenses? I was reading another article that the ruling did not strike down license requirements, laws on felons and the mentally retarded...
4 posted on
06/26/2008 7:28:09 AM PDT by
dubie
To: Bob Leibowitz
Looks like we dodged a bullet! ;-)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Oh happy day. On so many levels.
6 posted on
06/26/2008 7:28:39 AM PDT by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Why in the world would you post a link to your own blog site containing nothing more than the text you posted on FR?
Is it extreme vanity, silliness, or cognitive impairment?
7 posted on
06/26/2008 7:29:13 AM PDT by
Redbob
("WWJBD" ="What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: Bob Leibowitz
I was truely worried about this going the wrong way, after seeing some of the recent decisions.
Bravo, they got it right.
To: Bob Leibowitz
A freedom medal for Mr. Robert Levy and a hearty thank you on behalf of my relatives who gave their lives on April 19, 1775 so we could all enjoy that right.
9 posted on
06/26/2008 7:30:50 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(If it is going to take 10 years, shouldn't we get started? Drill here, drill now, pay less.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
"the standard view of the amendment, that it means what it says"
What?!?! None of that 'living, breathing document' crap that is usually spit out by the libbies on the court!!! Color me shocked!!!
But happy! Woot!
10 posted on
06/26/2008 7:32:57 AM PDT by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Thank you Mr. Levy
You're a true American patriot in my book.
To: Bob Leibowitz
Someone needs to challenge the Sullivan Act and the other crap like Chicago’s ban.
Even the requirement to have a CCH to carry concealed is crap IMO.
To: Bob Leibowitz; hellinahandcart; holdonnow; Congressman Billybob; Joe Boucher; Carry_Okie; ...
Even though today’s ruling turned out the way we wanted, I confess to a great deal of unease over waiting to hear what my rights are from a black robed oligarchy.
Yesterday’s ruling on child rapists proves my point.
16 posted on
06/26/2008 7:37:11 AM PDT by
sauropod
(God created asphalt so yuppies can go four-wheeling.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
I had serious doubts about the outcome. So glad to see I was wrong. A stronger majority would have been nice. But hey I’ll take this.
17 posted on
06/26/2008 7:37:13 AM PDT by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
18 posted on
06/26/2008 7:37:50 AM PDT by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Thanks for your quick and timely analysis, Bob.
21 posted on
06/26/2008 7:39:49 AM PDT by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
23 posted on
06/26/2008 7:41:41 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
To: Bob Leibowitz
In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."Is it me or does this prove how radically socialist and totalitarian the left wing members of SCOTUS are?
To: Bob Leibowitz
In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”
WTF...damn straight Justice Paul!
27 posted on
06/26/2008 7:43:51 AM PDT by
mr_hammer
(Checking the breeze and barking at things that go bump in the night.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
The troubling part is the 5-4 decision.
Four justices believe the 2nd amendment doesn't mean what it says.
28 posted on
06/26/2008 7:45:04 AM PDT by
Vinnie
(You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Hooray! That’s a big relief, and a decision that is long overdue. I’m more than a little concerned that there are four judges seated on the highest court of the land that do not agree.
So, when will the ACLU take their first case supporting an individual’s right to keep and bear arms? (I’m not holding my breath!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson