For Christie Brinkley (pictured), apparently her anger at her husband is far more important than the welfare of her kids. Whereas most stars want their divorces private, she's fighting to keep it as public as possible. Posted on 06/25/2008 1:54:49 PM PDT by PercivalWalks
For Christie Brinkley (pictured), apparently her anger at her husband is far more important than the welfare of her kids. Whereas most stars want their divorces private, she's fighting to keep it as public as possible.
To be fair, it sounds like Brinkley certainly had reason to be mad at soon-to-be-ex-husband Peter Cook over his infidelities and the harm he caused to their marriage. But having now married and divorced four separate times, it's doubtful that Brinkley is going to be giving lectures on "Why It's Important to Make Your Marriage Work" or "How to Be a Good Wife" any time soon.
(BTW, we do apply that both ways. When we're contacted by a man who wants to convince us what a bitch each one of his four ex-wives was, we don't put much stock in it.)
The key issue here, though, is the children. They have a nine-year-old daughter together, and Brinkley's 12-year-old son from her 3rd marriage also lives with them. Despite this, Brinkley seems determined to thrust this divorce into the spotlight as much as possible. From MSNBC's Are Christie Brinkley’s kids pawns in her divorce? (6/24/08):
Christie Brinkley is pursuing Brinkley-style brinkmanship by fighting to keep her messy divorce proceedings public, a celebrity divorce lawyer and a psychologist agreed.Glenn Sacks, www.GlennSacks.com“They’re playing a dangerous game of chicken with her children’s lives,” attorney Lois Lieberman told TODAY's Meredith Vieira Tuesday in New York.
The 54-year-old supermodel filed for divorce nearly two years ago, citing an affair her fourth husband, architect Peter Cook, 49, admitted having with his 18-year-old office assistant. The couple have one child together, 9-year-old Sailor. Also part of the family is Brinkley’s son, Jack, 12, from her third marriage.
An attorney appointed to represent the interests of the children joined with Cook’s attorney to keep the divorce trial, scheduled to begin July 2, private to protect the children. But Brinkley and Long Island newspaper Newsday asked to keep the trial public, and the judge agreed.
Lieberman told Vieira that it seems clear that Brinkley is trying to force Cook to settle on her terms rather than face the prospect of having his dirty laundry aired in public. In addition to the affair with his assistant, there have been allegations linking him to Internet porn and swingers’ groups.
A woman scorned?
Lieberman also feels Brinkley wants to get back at Cook for his infidelity to her.
“I truly believe that there is some vindictive measure that is part of this aspect of looking for the trial to be public,” the attorney said.
She said Brinkley’s motion to keep the trial public runs counter to normal procedure in celebrity divorces. Usually, she said, both parties try to keep proceedings private to protect their own reputations and their children.
In this case, many of the tawdry details have already been splattered all over the New York tabloids, and the children’s pictures have been published frequently. The couple live in the Hamptons, a Long Island retreat of the rich and famous and a small community in which everyone knows everyone else’s business.
[Note: If you or someone you love is faced with a divorce or needs help with child custody, child support, false accusations, Parental Alienation, or other family law or criminal law matters, ask Glenn for help by clicking here.]
Can I be #5?
I didn’t think she cared about infidelity considering her background.
Grounds for divorce, but not for harming the children.
BTW, in an discussion among my students I heard a reasonable formula for when the guy is too old for the girl (yeah, I teach kids who love math). The girl has to be at least seven years older than half the guy's age or the "ick" factor takes over, and I like the results I get from that calculation. It shouldn't be a crime, since the girl is legal, but it's nothing to be proud of either.
Sure it is. With her income far exceeding mine, I am sure to get sizeable manimony.
I thought she had only been married to Billy Joel and this guy, plus the guy she married after they survived a helicopter crash together (I think she married him). I guess I need to brush up on my tabloid reading, because I missed the fourth husband.
She’s 54?! Man, oh man, she must’ve made a deal with the devil, cause she looks phenomenal.
It will be much cheaper for you in the long run just to buy an inflatable doll
I can hear Billy Joel laughing from here.
Life is a one take movie ... if Cook hadn't let his little brain overrule his big brain he could have avoided this mess.
A tigress is a very beautiful creature and can be seduced with the right stimuli. But as we know, a tiger is a tiger, and a bitch is a bitch no matter how hot they are. If you cavort with this kind, you need to check you package after your done and hope she hasn't taken a pound of flesh along with your soul and precious time.
Her first husband was I think a French champagne heir or race car driver or something.....I can’t really remember......before she was well known.
Aside from the tawdryness of it all, I don’t see how this is using the kids, according to the article.
Is this a custody battle? Doesn’t seem to be. He screwed around so she has a right to flog him and he deserves what he gets, imo. Especially since he had a super model sitting right at home!! What an idiot.
“Life is a one take movie ... if Cook hadn’t let his little brain overrule his big brain he could have avoided this mess.”
Yeah, it would have been much easier on him if he’d just had a fling with her then gave her a house.
Uptown, Downtown, Midtown & All Around Town Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F-nt7aC_JQ
Billy Joel with Christy Brinkley
I want to see the pic of the woman he cheated on Christy with. 100:1 she’s light years less attractive on the outside and light years more attractive on the inside.
Olivier Chandon. They were going to get married, but he got killed before they tied the knot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.