Skip to comments.
Obama’s BIG Birth Certificate PROBLEM (Freeper credited)
No Quarter ^
| 6/20/08
| Staff
Posted on 06/21/2008 10:56:04 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-270 next last
Obama's fraudulent birth certification is now being exposed from the right and the lefties. LOL
Trouble is brewing.
And a guy who would fake a birth certification wouldn't be capable of sharing BJs and coke with a gay cruiser now would he?
1
posted on
06/21/2008 10:56:04 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: AmericaUnited; Lancey Howard; BossLady; txflake
2
posted on
06/21/2008 10:57:32 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Excellent work, pissant.
To: pissant
Yep, I mentioned the missing embossing seal the first time it was posted.
Maybe Dan can tell us for sure?
To: pissant
I’ll admit it will be funny if something comes about with this. I mean, the Lefties were so gung-ho that McCain couldn’t be president because he was born in the Canal Zone that if something in Hussein’s background such as this does him in, well, THAT will be hilarious.
5
posted on
06/21/2008 10:59:37 AM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Be careful! Communist ideas may give you brain cancer.)
To: pissant
Is there any doubt as to whether Obama’s mother was an American citizen? No. Therefore, Obama is an American citizen. End of story.
To: pissant
7
posted on
06/21/2008 11:01:51 AM PDT
by
monkeycard
(There's no such thing as too much ammo.)
To: pissant
They had computers in 1961 that could create these documents?
This is fraud, and Obama has some splainin to do.
I wonder is he's even a US citizen..
8
posted on
06/21/2008 11:02:32 AM PDT
by
MaxMax
(I'll welcome death when God calls me. Until then, the fight is on)
To: TexasCajun
And I noticed that the alignment of the intersections of the bottom corner borders of the version on KOS’s webiste and the version on Obama’s website was different. Meaning this thing is being printed up from different printers, OR, someone ‘corrected’ it after spotting the error. In theory, they were jpgs of the same document. LOL
9
posted on
06/21/2008 11:02:36 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Notice the first one says ‘date filed by the registrar’ and the second one says ‘date accepted by the registrar’?
10
posted on
06/21/2008 11:03:14 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: MaxMax
No, this is the way they do it now. That part is legit. But Obama’s version just happens to be a fraudulent version of the modern computer printed document.
11
posted on
06/21/2008 11:03:46 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: mnehrling
12
posted on
06/21/2008 11:04:12 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: snarks_when_bored
Not if he was born elsewhere.
13
posted on
06/21/2008 11:04:46 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: MaxMax
They had computers in 1961 that could create these documents? Big mistake a lot of folks are making. These are Certification of Birth, not original Birth Certificates. They could have been printed yesterday by a registrar's office.
14
posted on
06/21/2008 11:04:49 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: pissant
Look, I'm not one to stand and defend Obama or his minions - but before we get too excited, note a few things:
The comparison presented is from someone born 30 years earlier, and before statehood - I know my Virginia birth certificate looks different than my mother's, so would I expect some revisions over the years. Let's look at one from a similar timeframe before we get too hot and bothered.
Likewise, with the folding - the last new copy of my birth certificate I ordered, it came in a large manilla envelope, and has still not been creased with a fold to this day. And yet, *gasp* it's REAL.
We're really reaching, here. If it's fake, let's prove it - but let's not breathlessly report things that are probably inconsequential.
To: pissant
2. Certificate numbers are never blacked out.If the certificate is a fraud and the certificate number was not blacked out, it would seem to be easy to check the certificate number against the name. Therefore, the only reason for it to be blacked out is to avoid checking for fraud.
To: pissant
They also both say Rev 11/01 which should indicate that they Certification's details would be the same as they are from the same registration batch (ie, something happened in 11/01 (updates to the privacy act jumps to mind for me) that made them change something on the certificate, be it paper, watermarks, included information, etc). Different information included, along with different paper should indicate a different revision.
Just to be sure, I would like to see three or four others so we know where the flaw is.
I also wouldn't use the blacked out number as proof. Obama’s office may have done this simply for privacy reasons.
17
posted on
06/21/2008 11:08:06 AM PDT
by
mnehring
To: pissant
The lefties are not above forging documents as the Dan Rather fake document based “news report” in 2004 proved.
18
posted on
06/21/2008 11:08:10 AM PDT
by
RightWingConspirator
(Redefeat Communism by defeating the Obamanation in 2008)
To: pissant
Under Father's Race, it states “African”. Africa is a continent, not a race. I would think that if the formal names of Caucasian and Negro were not used in 1961, then White and Black would have been used. I'm curious to see an unaltered birth certificate from that era for a black child.
19
posted on
06/21/2008 11:08:18 AM PDT
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: beezdotcom
20
posted on
06/21/2008 11:09:25 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-270 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson