Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama birth certificate question re-opened
Stop the ACLU! ^ | 06/19/08 | JonJayRay

Posted on 06/19/2008 10:08:18 AM PDT by coffee260

Look at it. It’s lovely, isn’t it? There’s a much more detailed picture of it here (use the resize gadget to enlarge it).

But, as a graphics expert shows conclusively, it is a fake that somebody has produced using a graphics program.

So where is the real one? Does it exist? Is he really a native-born American, as the constitution requires?

Posted by John Ray. For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. For a daily survey of Australian politics, see AUSTRALIAN POLITICS Also, don’t forget your roundup of Obama news and commentary at OBAMA WATCH


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; obama; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last
To: imintrouble
When did a woman's (mother's) name become 'Stanley'? *sigh*

Here's a Stanley (Kowalski):


101 posted on 06/19/2008 11:45:21 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you ready to pray for Teddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

Doh....thanks for the correction..... my fault!

Mea culpa mea culpa....


102 posted on 06/19/2008 11:45:21 AM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble

Gee is Thursday CRANKY DAY here?

Usually the place is quite civil - cheer up people.


103 posted on 06/19/2008 11:49:34 AM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl; Clemenza

I don’t know what is junk science about it.
I still recognize the three basic racial classifications.
It is the same as the three primary colors, reb, blue, and yellow.
Obviously, there are sub racial groups, as well as mixed races.
I will admit that racial classification gets harder every year with mixing, but there are still obvious distinctions between the 3 primary groups.

And yes, when did “African” become a race????


104 posted on 06/19/2008 11:51:01 AM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

No amount of electoral votes will make it legal for a non citizen to be president of the United States. This is not a witch hunt. It’s an Official Document hunt. That’s all. If Obama’s people had not produced this apparent fraud the question would die.

(See the post where the Freeper showed us an official Cerificate, officially stamped).

http://www.valeehill.net/genealogy/showmedia.php?mediaID=169


105 posted on 06/19/2008 11:51:33 AM PDT by theoldmarine (justsaynodeal.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle
Very good!

Unless it has an embossed seal signed by the registrar, it is worthless. Even a copy should be signed and sealed.
Apparently the state of Hawaii requires an embossed seal as opposed to a stamped seal.
Notice the borders are different.

106 posted on 06/19/2008 12:03:01 PM PDT by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AlexW; Southerngl
Because scientists who study geneology have discovered that various genotypes are scattered throughout the world, making it difficult to put anything in three categories.

The idea of the "caucasian" ie Aryan (Indo-Aryan) race comes from the (since disproven) belief that all Europeans are from the caucauses mountain region (present day Armenia and Georgia). That is why when some idiot calls me a "caucasian" I always say "do I look like a (expletive) Armenian to you?"

Under the old discredited system, all East Indians were referred to as "caucasoids", although genetics have shown this to be far from the truth.

107 posted on 06/19/2008 12:05:55 PM PDT by Clemenza (No Comment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
Did you happen to notice the name on the certificate I posted?

(It's not OHB).

108 posted on 06/19/2008 12:09:14 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mondoreb

BTW, Mondo, here is something to cover. A graphics expert has taken the Kos/Obama birth certification to the woodshed.


109 posted on 06/19/2008 12:13:16 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

THANK YOU! And much thanks to the family of Patricia DeCosta for allowing us all to have a look at an actual document.

Right off top without further looking

1. has Dept. of Public Health Seal
2. has facsimile stamped signature
3. has different border than on Obama’s “document”

the plot thickens


110 posted on 06/19/2008 12:18:19 PM PDT by xiangchi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: theoldmarine

The real one - Patricia DeCosta - reads

“Date accepted by state registrar”

the Obama one reads

“Date filed by registrar”

?


111 posted on 06/19/2008 12:18:26 PM PDT by xiangchi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: pissant

he’s wrong about the seal and wrong about the overlapping border art. A Freeper said they looked at a copy of one from a year ago and the border DO overlap.


112 posted on 06/19/2008 12:24:50 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: pissant

He’s wrong about the seal and wrong about the overlapping border art. A Freeper posted they looked at a copy of a birth certifcate they had from a year ago and the border art DOES overlap.


113 posted on 06/19/2008 12:25:46 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: xiangchi

If you blow up the border corner on the DeCosta doc, it does overplap.

But I posted several times here how I contacted the dept and they said the signature stamp was on the back and the seal was embossed DEEPLY and visible from the front. On the DeCosta doc you can see it. On the Obama doc, IT SHOULD BE VISIBLE TOO!!!


114 posted on 06/19/2008 12:34:19 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited; coffee260; Moose4

Except it only overlaps on the Kos document. Someone fixed it on the Obama site version. Compare the lower corners of the border intersection for this:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616

and

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

I pointed this out last week, but was summarily ignored. Save both to your PC then zoom in the lower corners. they are separately produced documents. Surprised?


115 posted on 06/19/2008 12:37:30 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: pissant

So maybe it’s the degree of overlap, because on the real DeCosta doc, they do overlap slightly.


116 posted on 06/19/2008 12:45:29 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Overlap may or may not be the norm, but the FACT that there is NO OVERLAP on the version from Obama’s site tells us these were either created separately or printed separately. Either way, it is not two photocopies of the same document that was theoretically printed up from the State of Hawaii’s computer. In fact, the entire thing was forged, based on the other 10 points of the analysis.


117 posted on 06/19/2008 12:55:17 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Santan’s spawn, aka the black messiah needs...NO STINKIN birth certificate!


118 posted on 06/19/2008 1:40:33 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

.Even if the document is real, it doesnt matter because OBAMA AND MICHELLE ARE FAKE.


119 posted on 06/19/2008 1:51:47 PM PDT by metallatem (OBAMA SUCKS,HE LIES HE LIES LIES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Holy loophole, Batman! I thought someone born to one US citizen parent overseas was automatically a natural-born US citizen. Looks that the requirement is *two* US citizen parents. That’s just hard to fathom - that two illegal aliens on US soil can produce a natural-born US citizen baby, but one natural-born US citizen on foreign soil can’t produce a natural-born US citizen baby.


120 posted on 06/19/2008 2:02:53 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson