Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2008 9:38:29 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Taxman; Ladycalif; chicagolady; Delphinium; Gelato; MountainFlower; roamer_1; Steve Schulin; ...

The whole article is a long read, but worth it.


2 posted on 03/24/2008 9:40:44 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first front in any war is the war of words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Bloomberg gave up on his plan to go independent for one reason: Americans do not want a 3rd party candidate.

America wants McCain over anyone else, and that’s what counts.


3 posted on 03/24/2008 9:41:39 PM PDT by reagandissiple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Among those joining in the effort are presidential candidate Alan Keyes, American Minute founder Bill Federer, Council for National Policy member Bob Fischer, Minuteman national executive Director Al Garza, Constitution Party founder Howard Phillips, Gun Owners of American executive director Larry Pratt, Minuteman Civil Defense Corps founder Chris Simcox, Operation Save America founder Flip Benham and dozens of others.

Couldn’t find anybody sane?


4 posted on 03/24/2008 9:42:28 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

A conservative third party candidate will not work unless there are countervailing liberal third parties that dilute the votes in a general presidential election, which would give the conservative 3rd party a chance to win. So the answer is no to a third party... for now.


10 posted on 03/24/2008 9:48:14 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

Has former president Ross Perot weighed in on this?

13 posted on 03/24/2008 9:52:04 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Will the Presidential ballots be marked with “None of the Above”?

I feel like I woke up in the Bizarro World.


14 posted on 03/24/2008 9:54:09 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Hillary/Nader 2009- Consensus is in--- NO FURTHER DEBATE, Pleeese!
16 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:03 PM PDT by Mark (REMEMBER: Mean spirited, angry remarks against my postings won't feed even one hungry child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

without the crossover voting allowed in primaries would mccain have won the GOP nomination ?


17 posted on 03/24/2008 9:55:15 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

No.

35 posted on 03/24/2008 10:34:17 PM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
First thing — a third party is stupid if it's going to compete with one of the other parties for a losing fraction. A third party would want need to have the first intention of putting one of the other parties out of business eventually but co-existing with them in the beginning.

The way to replace the GOP with a true conservative party, the only reasonable way, is to recruit the already elected conservative Republicans to the new party and then you have an instant political party without a vote being cast.

From there, the new party cuts a deal with the Republicans to only challenge their most egregious rino incumbents if they agree not to challenge the conservative incumbents of the new party. It would be absurd for the Republicans to challenge a conservative incumbent since they'd never win the seat and could only help a Democrat get elected. Such an action would only cause the Republican dead-enders to jump ship to the new party.

It can be done, but it requires some planning and less emotion.

37 posted on 03/24/2008 10:36:46 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Is this the year for 3rd party candidate?

Yes, it is. But the key IMHO, is the Christians. It sounds as though they are attempting to mobilize through the Christian networks, which is exactly the thing to do. If Dobson and a few other Christian leaders get on board, this thing is gonna fly. If the Christians settle in behind one candidate and get his numbers (votes and $$m) into double digits (think Huck), the rest will take care of itself.

Yet another very serious issue, and one the Christians must pay attention to, is that the nominee must be a Reagan Conservative, capable of drawing from all three pillars of Conservatism. This is paramount, as Huckabee's run proved- The Christians can haul 'em outta' the basement and get them seen, but they cannot provide a win for the candidate without the rest of the Conservative community behind them.

This is critically important, because a third party candidate will be fighting heavy Republicanism all the way, and must be able to speak to the hearts of all conservatives to get tem to leave the Pubbies in droves. If they get past the "3rd parties can't win" crowd, the win is very possible.

40 posted on 03/24/2008 10:53:08 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Conservative always, Republican no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Unlikely to make a difference in 2008. We are laying the groundwork for 2012.

http://falconparty.com/


46 posted on 03/24/2008 11:01:51 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Forget the 3rd party candidate, draft JC Watts.


48 posted on 03/24/2008 11:02:51 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Mainstream Republicans warn that a division of vote, that is any conservative not supporting the more conservative of the mainstream candidates, will result in a White House run by the Democratic candidate.

So? And who's fault is that?

52 posted on 03/24/2008 11:08:59 PM PDT by upsdriver (My kingdom for an acceptable presidential candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

It’s 1992 all over again except that Clinton and Obama are BOTH the 3rd party candidates. Unless the Dems find someone else that both sides of that party can all vote for, McCain will be the plurality winner.


80 posted on 03/25/2008 4:21:24 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
I might be interested in a serious third party movement that started with a focus on local races and worked their way up to the Presidential race. I will never take any group serious whose focus is on the top race to start out. In my mind this shows a lack of strategic thinking.
84 posted on 03/25/2008 7:41:37 PM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson