Posted on 02/09/2008 6:09:01 PM PST by Fox_Mulder77
I was watching Obama talk last night, and the more I watched him, the more creepier he looked. His ears looked pointy, and his chin looked straight and pointy. His eyes were starting too look gloomy and tired. I swear, it looked like he was morphing into some kind of demon.
I hate that,...it always happens when nobody else is around and we're the only ones standing in front of the mirror. 0;^)
I was wondering yesterday.
On the (off) chance Obama might actually have America’s best interests in mind (yes I know, that’s not really evident) - there is the small possibility an Obama presidency could make Russia or China more a focus of the fundies - provided our own , ahem, governmental agencies have adequately ramped up our ability to enact change.
Or he’s the anti-Christ. One of those.
“Obama the Anti-Christ?”
Nope, just a commie.
Koo-koo-nut.
Just Say No!
“and if they got wound up over a sliver of a similar comment, then this should have been equally provocative to them.”
It would be but Obama isn’t a Mormon.
Obama says he wants to “create a kingdom right here on earth.” We know about Obama’s leftist, socialist church. I wonder about the eschatology of his Chicago pastor and church.
The Amillennial or Postmillennial (”Kingdom now”) eschatology is made to order for antichrist. Instead of looking for the second coming of Christ, who will, indeed, bring with him “a kingdom right here on earth” (the Millennial, Rev. 20), these types of eschatology apply Christ’s future kingdom to the here and now.
Amillennialism played a huge role during the middle ages. The eschatology of the RCC is Amillennial. They ruled Europe for a thousand years in “a kingdom right here on earth.”
Where did Obama get his “create a kingdom right here on earth” from? Out of thin air? I doubt it. Does anybody know the eschatology of his Chicago pastor and church?
If this is Obama’s eschatolgy, he is a most dangerous individual.
Oh, but since he's a religious minority (United Church of Christ) with less members than the 2% Mormons, that's OK to target. [Again, I want to make it clear that the UCC isn't worth defending on a lot of grounds; I'm just doin' a consistency check]
“[Again, I want to make it clear that the UCC isn’t worth defending on a lot of grounds; I’m just doin’ a consistency check]”
We don’ need no steenkin’ conseestency!
>I am no “end of the world nut”, but I find Obama to be a great candidate for being compared to the bible’s description of the anti-christ.<
Works for me.
you’re killin me :-)
Let’s see how he does with negotiations with Taliban and Alqaida. Then we’ll decide if he is qualified for anti-christ.
I don’ think Obama has quite what it takes to be the Antichrist. He’s a 555 in a 666 universe.
Why is the anti-christ always somebody important? Why isn’t Joe Schmoe the anti-christ?
“Why is the anti-christ always somebody important? Why isn’t Joe Schmoe the anti-christ?”
Joe Schmoe doesn’t get roaring applause when he says, “I am going to remake the world”
He hasn’t had the chance to do those things that he hasn’t done yet. Just give him time.
True, he get’s Mrs. Schmoe saying “Yeah, right... how about getting a job first...”
I believe Muslims are the decendants of Ishmael, son of Abraham and Haagar, the Egyptian maid to Sarah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.