Posted on 01/16/2008 8:43:47 AM PST by drzz
LIES ON GENERAL CUSTER AND THE LITTLE BIGHORN
http://www.custerwest.org
1) Custer never massacred Indians. (see the Battle of the Washita)
2) Custer was one of the most brilliant cavalry generals of his times (see Custer in the Civil War)
3) Custer understood how to fight Indians (see the Battle of the Washita, the Battle of the Little bighorn -LBH)
4) Custer never underestimated his enemy at Little Bighorn (see before the battle).
5) The Indians at LBH were 1'500, exactly the number of warriors Custer expected to surprise with his 647 soldiers (an usual tactic in Indian warfare). There has never been "thousands of Indians" in Sitting Bull's village or "an impossible victory" as some still say without knowing what the evidence say. (see "LBH: before the battle, Custer's plan).
6) The Indians never ambushed Custer, never flanked him. They were surprised by the attack and most of their actions were late and disorganized. (see Accounts by hostiles, Last Stand)
7) The entire 7th cavalry wasn't massacred at Little Bighorn. 2/3 of Custer's troops, who had to lead front and flank attacks, were out of the battle after 30 minutes and never reached Custer. This military betrayal by Major Reno and Captain Benteen can be proven with strong evidence shown on this website. It also explains why the army never did any inquiry on the battle (see Little Bighorn cover-up, Benteen's scout, Reno Hill, Captain Weir), and let the American public dream about the "reckless Custer".
8) Custer's attack at Little Bighorn has been supported by such figures as US general in chief Nelson Appelton Miles, the most successful Indian fighter in US history (see Little Bighorn cover-up), and many historians and others.
That’s a rugged area. The Bighorn Mtns. are pretty unique. Small area, very rugged and difficult to get around in, although I could agree that a force of 2000 Indians was a large force to hide. Fetterman was fearless though.
They either didn’t like Custer too much or Reno was a chicken and was simply worried about his own skin.
True, but also clueless about Indian warfare. He'd only been in the region some months yet believed he could whip the "savages" with 80 men. While such disregard for the Indian's ability to fight was prevalent in the military at the time, most who opposed them in open combat came to a respect of their fighting ability. Unfortunately for Fetterman, he never got the time.
Fetterman was fearless, but not for long, as you said, he had experience commanding 18th in the Civil War, but none against Indians. They tricked him into retreating into open area. Hey I want to thank you guys for the thread. It is interesting just to talk to people that study this stuff, and I assure you I am not anywhere close to you guys with your website...its very cool! My daughter and I have been all over Wyoming, South Dakota,and Montana installing including Gillette, Sheridan, Buffalo, Laurel, MT...we like to follow Lewis and Clark trail too.
I got the testimony of Gerard who said that Custer didn’t entirely scout Tullocks Creek but his scouts scanned the area.
Your videos are great. Kudos for a job well done and for adherence to good historical principles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.