Hunter vs Thompson

Bar of Integrity ^ | 11/12/07 | Staff

[pissant]

Hunter vs. Thompson.

filed under duncanhunter,Duncan Hunter,fredthompson,Elections 2008

Click here for PDF download

[Calpernia]

Excuse me? There is no campaign letter head, fake or otherwise on that flyer.

That graphic is a free download for the GoHunter site

[kevkrom]

The same ones we've been pointing out for months, such as the distortion of the April Fox News interview to paint him as pro-amnesty, and the citing of the oft-disproved "NumbersUSA" factoids. Not to mention the outright lie in reference to McCain-Feingold-Thompson, as no such bill ever passed, but a common Hunterite tactic.

[Paperdoll]

Freddie Dalton seems to have a serious long term memory problem.

If one is a conservative, one supports and votes for Duncan Lee Hunter. Period.

[kevkrom]

You're the one suggesting people print it out and mail it as an "unofficial" campaign flier. That "fake letterhead" is designed to make people think it's official campaign material, and would be read as such by most people receiving it in the mail.

In additional to being a likely violation of election law by being undeclared "in-kind" donations, they'd also portray the Hunter campaign itself in a bad light. You're offering folks bad advice.

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

The worst argument against federal law making the planned murder of the most helpless illegal was here on FR.

The unnamed person stated the Constitution does not say a female murdering their two year old child is against the law.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. “

No state would or could make a law saying the murder of a two year old was okay if it done by the birth female.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

There is no real contest between them. There is only self-inflicted pressure based on imaginary strategy claims.

[Calpernia]

Supporting a candidate doesn’t have to be a donation to the campaign.

Now you are suggesting criminal activities on my part. Bring them on or shut up.

[colorcountry]

So why not post comparisons between Hunter and one of the front running RINOs. He is sure to come up to a much more conservtive position when compared to them.

Or how about Huckabee, Tancredo or Ron Paul. They too are candidates and Hunter still “outconservatives” them.

Like I said, I’ll support Hunter (in fact just sent in my second donation yesterday). But not at Thompson expense. He is our next hope. Attack the other guys please.

Of course - JMHO.

[pissant]

None of those are lies. It was indeed often referred to McCain Feingold Thompson. Google it.

[kevkrom]

Supporting a candidate doesn’t have to be a donation to the campaign.

Sending out an advertisement using a campaign logo and directly comparing two candidates is advertising on behalf of the campaign. If this were legal, don't you think you'd see the Soros-funded left using the tactic?

[Calpernia]

You are obviously commenting without clicking through to the site. Thompson is not the only flyer.

[Calpernia]

The logo is offered as a free download from the site.

And yes, I get candidate comparison mailings all the time.

If I violated the law, bring on charges or shut up. You are accusing me of criminal activity.

[colorcountry]

You are right. I am basing my post on the headline and on the posts of this thread.

I won’t take part in Thompson bashing. Sorry.

[kevkrom]

None of those are lies. It was indeed often referred to McCain Feingold Thompson. Google it.

They're all lies and distortions.

There WAS a McCain-Feingold-Thompson bill, but it never passed. In a later session of Congress, it was reintroduced as McCain-Feingold, and eventually passed. Calling it McCain-Feingold-Thompson is incorrect, dishonest, and completely consistent with the over-rabid Hunter supports' tactics here on FR.

[Calpernia]

I’ll refer you back to post 15.

[Wallace T.]

Hunter is the strongest, all-around conservative in the race. Thompson is not quite so strong, but he is far and away better than Rudy McRomney. One of these two men has got to be the champion of real conservatism in the GOP. Take them out, and you are left with three RINOs, a libertarian idealist, and Bill Clinton with a theology degree and better personal morals. Conservatives have a duty to preserve the party of Goldwater and Reagan. The triumph of Giuliani or Romney in the GOP primaries is the posthumous victory of Nelson Rockefeller. They (and McCain) must be stopped at all costs.

[cripplecreek]

There WAS a McCain-Feingold-Thompson bill, but it never passed. In a later session of Congress, it was reintroduced as McCain-Feingold, and eventually passed.

So the fact that he tried to pass bad legislation and failed absolves him of responsibility? Kinda like his votes to increase H-1B visas and went into committee and voted to fire Americans and replace them with his visa holders. He may have failed but it wasn't due to a lack of trying.

[colorcountry]

I’ll refer you to post 36.

This poster has his priorities straight.

[AuntB]

So why not post comparisons between Hunter and one of the front running RINOs. He is sure to come up to a much more conservtive position when compared to them. Or how about Huckabee, Tancredo or Ron Paul. They too are candidates and Hunter still “outconservatives” them.

That happens every day here. Where ya been?

[AuntB]

Pinging you B4. Thought you might like to come tell us about seeing Hunter in Reno last weekend. You seemed impressed from what you told me.