For Amanpour, luxuary of SOME Arab 'Palestinians' is more worth than LIVES of scores of Israelis?

[PRePublic]

Because for 'Christianne Amanpour':

Luxuary of ONE or two Arab "Palestinians" is more worth than LIVES of scores of Israelis?

You haven't missed anything if you haven't seen the propaganda piece "God's warriors", or the bigoted part therein where a 'Palestinian' complains about the wall...

The Threat

Everybody knows what a genocide bomber is, everybody knows the massacres by "freedom fighters" 'Palestinians' as well as their reduction thereof after the erection of the security wall, or what radical 'Palestinians' intentions are, in their charter, as well as here and there declarations, from annihilation of all non Muslims, non Arabs [aka Jews, "throwing them all to the sea", "drinking their blood", "wiping off maps", you name it] in the area, to their global Islamic war, from Seville in Spain [yes, Hamas wants that too] to the Global Islamic repressive Caliphate, where any real [no, not the Carter-propaganda slur type] South African 'Apartheid' is luxuary against that Islamic ultimate 'plan' to oppress all non Muslims under Sharia.

The necessity & the uncomplaining Israelis

So everybody knows why Israel needs an Israel DEFENSE force, more check points than just in airports which we are all accustomed to, you don't hear Israeli Jews complaining day and night to TV cameras for their hardship in being checked (almost) 24/7 to any public place, from the supermarket to the arena.

The issue by biased journalism is not security and lives but a luxury of one or two 'Palestinians'

Let's be honest the democratic State of Israel's court did rule to change the outline of the security-fence, so not to make hardship for some Arab families, even though the fence, the shield is about saving lives. But the Israeli courts = 'equal for all' and often favoring Arabs over Israeli-Jews (yes, that is missing from Jimmy Carter's book too), now, show me ONE Jewish family living in [not only 'Apartheid Palestine' but ultimately] racist 'Palestine'! Still. most 'Palestinians' want to cross over & work in Israel, because it's a better, it's a free & open country, so naturally some of them would complain about the "inconvenience" of a wall. Try to get the BBC, or CNN's Christianne Amanpour to talk about the saving lives objective, nah, it's not "news", news is bashing Israel, anyone that can put struggling Israel in a bad light is old/new "news".

Short 'history' of the Islamic Apartheid's invention of 'Apartheid slur' upon Israel's democracy

Actually it's not just one idiotic journalist quoting the ugly cliche line like: "some critics call the wall apartheid wall", first the racist "apartheid slur" which is just that, stressing the luxury of one or two Arabs over Israel's lives-savings, was only the language by the darama-dictionary of the fake "Palestinians" PALLYWOOD, then the UK's 'The Guardian' started to use it mercilessly [for the heck of it, it's the same biased paper that was stubborn to counter with an amateur respond, the processionals that proved that the Arab family on Gaza-beach 2006, was bombed by a Hamas mine and not by IDF], then recently the infamous Arab Muslim lobby paid Jimmy Carter [the worst ex-president, the one at fault of installing the Islamic totalitarian theocracy, the oppression, mass torture, mass killings, and all crimes against humanity being perpertrated upon the Iranian people, and ultimately the menace of a nuclear bomb upon the entire world by Adolph Ahmadinejad] to use it.

Has it ever occurred to these journalists that anti-Israel fascists do NOT have real "issues"?

Part of it is also the notion , oh if the "palestinians" complain, so it must be THE issue, after all, to every war there are two sides, Is it deliberate or naive, that the journalists can't get the reality, harsh as it might be, simply, that the Arabs are racists, that the Muslims are intolerant of anyone being there? Yesterday it was so called "land", today it's a "wall", and What was it in 1929 [Hebron massacre]?