Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Bias in Reporting Thompson Fundraising (Fred Alert!)
The Liberty Sphere ^ | August 01, 2007 | D. Martyn Lloyd-Morgan

Posted on 08/01/2007 2:31:03 AM PDT by Josh Painter

The mainstream media, relying on the skewed opinions of a few pundits with a vested interest in negative spin, have shown remarkable bias in reporting Fred Thompson's fundraising. The former U.S. Senator from Tennessee raised 3.5 million dollars in the month of June alone.

Yet Katie Couric and CBS News put a negative spin on the story, as did the pundits at Politico.com. Even Fox News reported the story with a negative slant.

Couric emphasized that Thompson did not reach the stated goal of 5 million in June. Fox pointed to supposed turmoil in the Thompson camp, leading to the failure to build on the momentum the Senator had originally exhibited. Politico said that the 3.5 million is an indication that Thompson's appeal is turning lackluster.

First, the goal of raising 5 million dollars in one month by a former Senator who has not even announced his candidacy admittedly was a lofty goal. Perhaps the rationale was to deliberately set the bar high so that everyone would try harder.

Second, the failure to reach that lofty goal is not the issue. The amount raised is the issue.

3.5 million in one month is no failure by anyone's estimation. It took Ron Paul, for example, two quarters (six months) to gather a warchest of 2.5 million in cash.

Thompson is now number four among the Republicans in total funds raised and number three in available cash, now that we know McCain has already spent most of his available funds.

Third, the thing that is entirely remarkable about these facts is that Thompson was able to accomplish this feat in only one month as compared to six months for everyone else. The pundits and talking heads of the mainstream media totally missed this point.

Fourth, it would appear that not only are the Democrats afraid of Thompson, but so is the mainstream media. Anyone who is viewed as the one candidate who can derail the Clinton-Obama bandwagon is to be viewed with fear and trembling as far as the socialists are concerned.

We think their fears are well-founded.

And thus, we can expect the media establishment and the Democrats to hurl mud and accusations at a frantic pace.

The Fox News spin is the one that is the most surprising of all. Fox pointed to grumbling among Thompson's campaign staff as an indication things are falling apart.

As it turns out, Thompson's wife, who is a political consultant and campaign expert, is the target of the staffers' grumbling. It is well-known among those who cover political campaigns that candidates' spouses are normally vilified by staffers for their intrusiveness. So this is nothing new.

The difference in Thompson's case is that the spouse is probably more qualified and skillful than 99% of the staff. Thompson's staff will either have to find a way to live with that fact, or else they will have to leave. This is the candidate's wife, and she is considered a formidable force when it comes to political strategy.

The bottom line? The story about Thompson's 'failure' at fundraising is pure spin and nothing more.

But then, what did you expect? Couric and all of the others at CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN are in the hip-pockets of the Democrats. I suspect that Fox supports Rudy Giuliani.

Our opinion is that by the time this is all said and done, Fred Thompson will have some big surprises in store for Fox and the Democrats' mouthpieces at the other networks.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: democrats; donatetofred; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; gop; media; msm; nomination; republicans; rfr


Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Quick Reference

Fred Thompson FAQ: THE Fred Thompson Web Resource
1 posted on 08/01/2007 2:31:05 AM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

It wasn’t even a whole month—it was 26 days! You won’t hear that from the MSM, Rooty-tooties, Hunterites, Paulestinians, etc. since it gores their ox. If Fred had raised $5 or 6 million, they’d say that he’s “breaking the law” or not complying with FEC guidlines. You can’t win with these people, so why try? Looks like Fox News is in bed with Rudy, for whatever reason, so that explains their take on it. I’d bet that Fred will have million dollar DAYS once he announces!!


2 posted on 08/01/2007 2:46:14 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; Politicalmom; SE Mom

“Thompson is now number four among the Republicans in total funds raised and number three in available cash, now that we know McCain has already spent most of his available funds.”

Not bad for 26 days’ work. That’s gotta be worth a ping or two...


3 posted on 08/01/2007 2:58:31 AM PDT by Josh Painter ( "This is our home and we get to decide who gets to come into our home." - Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

What really worries me is the $52 million that Obama/ Clinton raised in the quarter & just for the primary. And, add in some extra odd millions raised for the general election by the duo. It’s not about how much was raised in X number or days, weeks, months...it’s all about the size of the accumulated warchest, how the cash is being ‘invested’, & how much is on hand.


4 posted on 08/01/2007 3:22:15 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

3.46 million $ in 26 days seems like a helluva good start- let em spin...they’re getting dizzy:)


5 posted on 08/01/2007 5:20:59 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Politico said that the 3.5 million is an indication that Thompson's appeal is turning lackluster.
And we have FReepers who TODAY are repeating this same spin! Galling. There's something wrong when your talking point is the same as Politico's and Katie Couric's.
6 posted on 08/01/2007 6:40:59 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; granite; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.

7 posted on 08/01/2007 6:58:57 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Looks like Fox News is in bed with Rudy, for whatever reason, so that explains their take on it.

On the surface, I'd say it's because their news centers are in NYC & DC. So Rudy McTooty being the former Mayor of NYC, it makes sense.

But I'd not be surprised to find there's more to it than that.

8 posted on 08/01/2007 7:05:07 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Fourth, it would appear that not only are the Democrats afraid of Thompson, but so is the mainstream media. ............ We think their fears are well-founded.

"I love the smell of Fred Fear in the morning"

FEAR THE FRED

9 posted on 08/01/2007 7:27:18 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
I suspect that Fox supports Rudy Giuliani.
They try to hide it so as not to alienate us, but they clearly do support Rudy.
10 posted on 08/01/2007 7:44:38 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

Thank you for this very accurate and perceptive post!


11 posted on 08/01/2007 9:24:00 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elli1
I wonder how much of the $52 million that the Obama/Clinton machine has raised came from the George Soros network. This is a tactic. You make the candidate look good with the appearance of accumulating a large warchest. This entices other contributers to go with the winning team. The machine grows.

Meanwhile, the Thompson fund raising effort is in stealth mode. When the contribution switches are pulled, there will be a flood of money that has never been seen in politics. I predict that this effort is all about timing. It will be timed so that the main stream media will be unable to spin the reality of Fred Thompson’s popularity. I will have my popcorn ready.

12 posted on 08/01/2007 9:34:03 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I agree but Fred should have shut his mouth and just raise money than he would have nothing but good news. They said the same thing about McCain that he did not make the amount he was expecting. Did you come to his defense?????


13 posted on 08/01/2007 9:42:21 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
I just posted this at the Daily FReead:

Poll Update: Thompson and Giuliani running neck and neck

This post was written by Jason Easley on 31 July, 2007 (17:50)

According to the most recently released Rasmussen Reports weekly Republican poll results, Rudy Giuliani and still undeclared candidate Fred Thompson are engaged in a race for the GOP nomination that is a virtual dead heat. Thompson and Giuliani both have 25% support. John McCain and Mitt Romney have continued to battle it out for third. Romney has 12%, McCain 11%, and 17% are undecided. No other candidate in the Republican field pulls more than 4%. The real story here continues to be Fred Thompson. Rasmussen Reports also does a daily tracking poll, and Thompson has led Giuliani on every day but one for over two weeks now. In the daily tracking poll, Thompson led Giuliani 25%-24% on Monday and 26%-24% today. The biggest lead that Thompson has ever had in the daily poll was 5 points.

In the weekly polls, it has been two months since Giuliani last led Thompson. Giuliani has seen his support erode from a high of 37% in March to a low of 21% last week. It has been six weeks since Giuliani last broke 25%. It has been 13 weeks since he was last at 30% or higher. In the last three months, Giuliani’s support has been between 21%-25%. On the other hand, Fred Thompson has not been below 24% in two months. Out of all the Republicans, he is the one that can be described as on the up swing. While his competitors are trending down, Thompson has posted his best numbers in three of the last seven weeks. Much like Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side, Thompson has seen his numbers steadily climb.

Mitt Romney continues to struggle to gain ground on the top two. Romney has been stuck at 12% for four straight weeks, and has never registered more than 16% since the weekly poll began in January. This high water mark came on May 29, and he has stayed stuck at 11%-15% ever since. Romney needs to win in Iowa and New Hampshire in order to even have a chance at the nomination. Since January 23, John McCain’s support has been literally sliced in half. In January McCain was at 22%, now he is at 11%. McCain has spent ten consecutive weeks between 11%-14%. His campaign already looks like it is on life support.

The big question that the pundits are debating is will the Fred Thompson honeymoon last with GOP primary voters? My guess is that it probably won’t, but he will hold strong. Those who think Thompson will fade seem to be basing their conclusion on their evaluation of Thompson the candidate. The people who are thinking this way are missing the point. Fred Thompson doesn’t have to be a great candidate to win the nomination. All he needs to do is be more conservative than Giuliani, McCain, and Romney. GOP primary voters aren’t sold on any of the top current candidates and seem to be looking for a more traditional type of Republican. In other words, they are looking for the anti-Rudy. If Thompson can fill this role, he has a good chance to win the Republican nomination. Republicans appear to want an alternative, and Fred Thompson is in the best position to provide them with one.



Let the gnasties chew on that for a while. :)

14 posted on 08/01/2007 9:43:22 AM PDT by jellybean (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Fred bump! Wait 'til he declares, gnats.


15 posted on 08/01/2007 9:46:32 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

No surprise about FoxNews whatsoever, they’ve been turning liberal/socialist for years now.

We rarely watch any of it, possibly Brit Hume once in a blue moon. His panel (except for Charles) sounds contrived and focuses on many non-stories, ignoring what is really going on.


16 posted on 08/01/2007 10:16:17 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (PUT AMERICA AHEAD! VOTE FOR FRED!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Oh, I’m sure a lot of stuff is going on behind the scenes. How fund-raising goes for Republican candidates remains to be seen but I anticipate a tougher go this cycle.


17 posted on 08/01/2007 11:21:05 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson