Posted on 07/29/2007 1:04:35 PM PDT by Calpernia
B4DH
“Hunter’s response was deemed to be the most favorable of the 11 by the panel.”
When most people KNOW Duncan Hunter, they will support him.
When this little contest at WHO translates into better than 2% poll numbers for Congressman Hunter, ping me, okay?
Do you care what poll the stats are from?
So, IOW, you want your own sources. Then you answer is, yes, you care what the source is.
ciao
They’re not.
I spent several hours arguing with some Hunter supporters on another thread about whether he was polling <1% or 3%. As if there is a difference. Still, I was called a liar and a shill for the Establishment.
Don't you dare imply me.
Didn’t you and I attend the same CFR roundtable? After that, I headed over to my abortion clinic, performed 2 or 3 procedures, stopped by Skull & Bones for a quick orgy, went to a LaRaza cocktail party, and then over to Michael Vick’s pad for a dogfight.
| Amanda Mittlestadt Johnston (D) |
Jill Jennings Ankeny (D) |
Carol Kersey Huxley (I) |
Bob Baldwin Des Moines (I) |
John Strong West Des Moines (R) |
Isaiah McGee Waukee (R) |
Candidate Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biden |
B
|
C
|
B
|
A
|
D
|
C
|
C+ (2.5) |
| Brownback |
F
|
B
|
C
|
B
|
B
|
A
|
C+ (2.5) |
| Clinton |
B
|
A
|
D
|
B
|
D
|
D
|
C (2.16) |
| Dodd |
F
|
D
|
D
|
C
|
C
|
C
|
D+ (1.33) |
| Edwards |
A
|
B
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
C
|
C (2) |
| Gravel |
B
|
C
|
F
|
D
|
D
|
C
|
D+ (1.5) |
| Hunter |
C
|
A
|
B
|
D
|
B
|
B
|
B- (2.66) |
| McCain |
F
|
C
|
B
|
B
|
B
|
B
|
C+ (2.33) |
| Obama |
B
|
B
|
C
|
C
|
D
|
D
|
C (2) |
| Romney |
F
|
F
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D- (0.66) |
| Tancredo |
F
|
F
|
F
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
F+ (0.5) |
| Grading Scale: | A+ = 4.33, A = 4.0, A- = 3.66, B+ = 3.33, B = 3.0, B- = 2.66, C+ = 2.33, C = 2.0, C- = 1.66, D+ = 1.33, D = 1.0, D- = 0.66, F+ = 0.33, F = 0 |
||||||
I guess it isn’t blind. See my post 14. Their names are at the news site.
Pictures of the people polled are here too:
http://www.iowavotes2008.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1894&Itemid=37
I graduated from Ballard HS in Huxley, so I might call Carol and se what that was all about.
You were called a:
“Liar, liar, pants on fire”
when you said <1%, but could any provide ANY POLL to show that it was LESS THAN 1%, because no poll exists.
No one called you a liar for polls that said Hunter was 1% - 3%, only when you said LESS THAN 1%, and could not provide a poll to back it up, and you are STILL exaggerating, because you are afraid that a real CONSERVATIVE will get the nomination, and Hunter will.
Clinton was 2% in the polls in OCTOBER of ‘91, and this is only the end of JULY.
So don’t you think if an unpatriotic person like Clinton can win, that a Patriot and competent candidate, like Hunter, has an even better chance?
Yeah, what a sham poll.
A mere six people?
This is known as the “small numbers fallacy.”
And the two parties are not even gender balanced.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.