Thanks for your service.
You left out the primary reason why I asked that poster and made that statement...
"Since I have asked you twice already if you would support Thompson if he is the nominee, and both times you have refused to answer, I have to ask you one more time"
You've been around long enough to know that we have many disruptors here. That poster was a very recent newbie, and when I read thru his/her "In Forum" of all previous posts, there was no ample evidence of this person being a committed conservative. The opposition are signing up on FR and trying to pose as conservatives in order to divide us amongst ourselves.
I was merely, and politely I may add, trying to see if this person would utter any words of support for someone other than Duncan Hunter, who if you read all of my posts you would have noticed that I like Hunter and would support him as nominee, and I clearly stated that.
I have seen this pattern of disruptor before. Obviously the mods had some similar thoughts about his sincerity, as that poster has been zotted.
Again, if you read all my posts, my position is uncommitted and supportive of more conservative candidates to enter. I like Thompson, but I would like to see more good conservatives throw their hat in the ring, instead of the media darlings who have a milk toast brand of conservatism.
I'm not a bot for any current candidate.
Hope that helps. Don't get your account deleted! :)
So have I.
It was the same question the Rudy-bots pummeled all who dared to question his 'anointment', so please understand that this type of question has a bad history here.
Forcing ANYONE to declare their support for ANYONE is, in my opinion, unacceptable.
So, to your question, "Will you support Thompson if he gets the nomination?", I say to you -
Maybe I will and maybe I won't.
Can you live with that?