[airborne]

I have seen this pattern of disruptor before.

So have I.

It was the same question the Rudy-bots pummeled all who dared to question his 'anointment', so please understand that this type of question has a bad history here.

Forcing ANYONE to declare their support for ANYONE is, in my opinion, unacceptable.

So, to your question, "Will you support Thompson if he gets the nomination?", I say to you -

Maybe I will and maybe I won't.

Can you live with that?

[NewLand]

So, to your question, "Will you support Thompson if he gets the nomination?", I say to you -

Maybe I will and maybe I won't.

Can you live with that?

Absolutely. You answered. Initially he would not. He was a suspected disruptor. He eventually did answer. Once he did, my reply was 'case closed' meaning that's all I wanted to see. An answer. Any answer.

I understand the history of FR and these issues as well or better than most. That's one reason why I take my own personal time to flush out disruptors. I think I've been pretty helpful to FR, as have many others, in self-policing this site.