Posted on 01/06/2007 2:28:54 PM PST by maquiladora
Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons, the SUNDAY TIMES of London is planning to report, British media sources tell DRUDGE... MORE...
PAPER: ISRAEL PLANS NUCLEAR STRIKE ON IRAN
Wow. It's about damn time to end the Iranian Nuclear BS.
More power to Israel. That'll teach the ragheads to want nuclear weapons.
I do remember Iraq's nuclear program suffering a similar fate at the hands of the Israelis.
I have been getting the impression just lately that more is astir than reinforcing our Iraq effort. I remember when we started moving things around Iraq (both times, come to think of it), people wondered if it was just a bluff. I hope this is for real. President Bush has clearly described the "gathering threat" and the need to act, and he does tend to follow up on what he says.
It's really NOT news . Of course they have a plan , probably several versions , set up to stop Iran from blowing them off the map. These things are not put together overnight . I'm sure Israel has been making such plans for years just in case.
He said he was going to do something in Aug too. He blows a lot of hot air out his a$$ that guy.
LOL
Agreed
Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons AFTER they destroy the SUNDAY TIMES of London, British media sources tell DRUDGE... MORE...
There. That's better.
"If this does happen you can bet the farm that Iran will come after anyone in the neighborhood."
You mean the great military power that barely managed to hold the Iraqi military at bay for 10 yrs? The military we took out in mere hours? That Iran?
There is a world of difference between occupying a nation and simply reducing their fighting capacity to nothing. No sticky insurgent (terrorist) concerns involved there - at least not straight up.
And as far as retaliation through offspring organizations: 1. who will finance/train them then? 2. None of them would be able to claim that we are a paper tiger after THAT. That's bad for recruiting, not good. 3. It's not like they aren't expending maximum effort now. 4. At least as much of the Muslim World would be relieved as would get angry. 5. Their version of respect has nothing to do with diplomacy. they would respect us MORE. 6. Caligula: let them hate us so long as they fear us more.
Pax Americana.
~faith.
You rock, tlj18. Thanks for posting and thank you for your service. God bless.
I want to see Cheney himself string up the leak this time. Why aren't leakers treated the same as those who commit treason?
And who would that be other than Israel? They are surrounded by American troops to their west and east. Syria would drop Iran as quickly as you can say BOOM. They want no part of this, trust me. The only protesting would come from Russia and China.
Back to the story... I think the only reason this story was leaked is to pressure the UN (and the new US Congress) to impose more sanctions against Israel.
But saying that would make the story less panicky, and journalism, after all, is primarily about fanning as many negative emotions as possible (and it sells!).
In the world of Cheap-Shot Artists, there is nothing cheaper than a journalist. Except an editor.
We pray for the Israelis.
Great post!
That man SOOOO needs to go!
The people of Iran have had almost thirty years to remove the mullahs and their ilk. In the end, you have to hold the people of a nation responsible for the actions of their leaders. It's time for Eternal Persia to die.
Try it that way and let me know what you think.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.