Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darfur: the genocide is Islamic racism
Foehammer.net ^

Posted on 12/31/2006 5:11:40 PM PST by PRePublic

Darfur: the genocide is Islamic racism

http://www.foehammer.net/2006/12/darfur-genocide-is-islamic-racism.html

For many months now, most of us have heard the name Darfur, a western region of Sudan in North Africa. On December 12 members of the United Nations Human Rights Council are to once again attempt to tackle the ongoing "genocide" problem in Darfur.

The previous conflict in Sudan (ending in 2005 with a peace treaty) was primarily between Christian and Animist forces in the south and the Muslim north. More than 2 million Christians and non-Muslims were enslaved, raped, tortured and murdered from 1983 to 2005.

Osama bin Laden and his followers had used Sudan as a base at one point also, beginning in 1991.

To this point today, more than 4 million southern Sudanese have been displaced, many to other nearby countries. They barely survive and those that do are in the worst of conditions.

Today, the death-dealing is primarily between the black Sudanese Muslims of Darfur and the Arab Muslims (Janjaweed militia) from the north. The typical Arab Muslim in Sudan considers himself superior to the black, and this is not an uncommon belief throughout the Arab Muslim world, and hardly a new one. It is an ancient racism going back to the first incarnations of Muslims in the Middle East and the Arab Animists predating those.

So what is this genocide really?

It is jihad inspired by racism, in-turn inspired by political ambition. The government of Sudan is supporting the genocide and slavery and arming the Janjaweed. It is the very same method used against the non-Muslims, and the world stood back and barely lifted a finger to aid Sudan then, and hasn't made a move yet on the current atrocities. But international pressure is mounting.

Why now? U.S. Democratic representatives are making more noise. Even President Bush has voiced more concern. But should we step in to the breach in a fight between Muslims again? Have we learned nothing from our stays in Iraq and Afghanistan?

It is my firm belief that the United States should stay out of North African affairs and put this into the hands of the United Nations member states to do something -- for once. This is not our responsibility.

And the UN remains impotent in rendering a solution to this conflict in Darfur because so many of the Muslim members of the UN simply do not care or are profiting from the carnage or believe firmly in the jihad. Again, the problems of the international community seem to lie more with the apathy and ambitions of the Muslim Middle Eastern states than with much else in the world. And once again, the UN is going to ask the United States to step in and spend blood and treasure to fix the problem?

The answer from Congress and President Bush should be clear enough: NO.

posted by Foehammer at 3:39 PM permalink


TOPICS: Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: arabization; arabracism; darfur; genocide; islam; islamicracism; islamofascism; racism; slavery; sudan

1 posted on 12/31/2006 5:11:42 PM PST by PRePublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PRePublic
the genocide is Islamic racism

A church and state relationship as deliniated in the First Amendment is a warning regarding the church/ state relationship as you see in Islamic states.

The left in this country whining about a manger scene misses the mark by about a mile.

2 posted on 12/31/2006 5:27:51 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRePublic
It is my firm belief that the United States should stay out of North African affairs and put this into the hands of the United Nations member states to do something -- for once. This is not our responsibility.

You gotta be kidding. As the most powerful Christian nation on Earth is is precisely the duty of the United States to do something about this since there is no way in hell to expect God to smile upon us if we ignore such a thing.

My suggestion: Assuming we still possess some of the old-fashioned submarines which fire torpedos and sink ships, simply station one or two such off shore of Sudan and tell the lunatics running Sudan that until the persecution of Christians stops, nobody is loading oil off of Sudan, and any ship attempting it will be sunk. That would not put a single American life at risk and the cost would be minimal.

3 posted on 12/31/2006 5:39:22 PM PST by jeddavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeddavis

We should be doing everything possible to help the people in southern Sudan.
The President has been pushing the envelope consistently and the UN has responded with nothing.

So what is new. In the end, the US may need to resort to covert means to aid the defenseless Sudanese against the government supported Arab terrorists.


4 posted on 12/31/2006 6:51:32 PM PST by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PRePublic

Part of the Islamic Reich's anschluss..


5 posted on 01/02/2007 12:53:41 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

History repeats itself 'appesement by the very victims' of it.


6 posted on 01/02/2007 6:17:23 PM PST by PRePublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson