Posted on 12/01/2006 9:30:13 PM PST by EndWelfareToday
Just wanted to put in my nomination for Tom Tancredo the Republican Representative from Littleton Colorado to be the next President of the United States. Personally I believe that he is the single strongest voice on Capitol Hill for securing our borders and protecting the sovereignty of the United States. I am tired of having to pick the lesser of two evils and with both Georges that is what it has come down to in my mind. Both Georges and Bill Clinton have and are working in concert with Jimmy Carter and the rest of the Tri-Lateral commission to destroy our culture. None of them are willing to stand up and fight for our constitutionally guaranteed rights. None of them are willing to enforce our immigration laws and none of them have nominated a constitutionalist to the bench on either the Federal or Supreme Court level. They have succumbed to the wishes of the Globalists and are in fact globalists themselves and I say it is time to put a stop to their "thousand points of light" their "New World Order" campaign to sell America out.
Please join me in petitioning Tancredo to run for President in '08.
Someone with a spine and the eggs to stand up to the moderates has got to run for President. I could be wrong but I believe that Tancredo is just such a man.
JMHO
Dont forget to throw in Miami as the worlds focus of evil.
NEWT!
Newt is a tad too big-government for me. Tancredo, OTOH, is freaking awesome.
Anyone that makes the libtards howl, must be doing something RIGHT!
If Newt doesn't run, I'll back Tancredo all the way!
AFAIK Tancredo is actually conservative. I don't think Republicans have much faith in that.
If you want the Dems win over 65-70% of the vote and get a super majority in Congress, then yes Tancredo should be our nominee for President.
btw Tancredo, come clean and tell us how much you are being paid by the Dems and la raza groups to tarnish the image border security conservatives,
As you can see from my tagline,,,I've been 'rallying' for Tancredo too. I have been hoping he'd throw his hat into the ring as he said he would, if no one else steps forward to address this issue. And Duncan Hunter has. I expect that Tom Tancredo will throw his support behind Duncan Hunter. He has a son fighting over in Iraq and has a nearly flawless voting record on border security and illegal immigration. Personally, I think they'd make a great 'team'. Here's Hunter's record:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1743337/posts?page=161#161
"If you want the Dems win over 65-70% of the vote and get a super majority in Congress, then yes Tancredo should be our nominee for President."
If you folks would stop supporting Bush's OBL agend and unite behind a Republican candidate who supports what the majority of american's want, a secured border and immigration laws enforced, Democrats wouldn't stand a chance as this WILL be the hot button issue for '08.
"btw Tancredo, come clean and tell us how much you are being paid by the Dems and la raza groups to tarnish the image border security conservatives,"
Actually, it was team Clinton and Rove who were pandering to the LaRaza groups. And would you mind telling us exactly which 'border security conservatives', Tancredo's been 'tarnishinig'?
Being in Miami, we aren't allowed to vote for him, third world country you know.
Not just the liberals but the Globalists as a whole do not like Tancredo. All the more reason to vote for him if we can get him to run.
Something about this keyword disgusts me:
ISEEBROWNPEOPLE
I thought this was a conservative site. But I guess being anti-illegal and pro-border means you're a racist to some moron. I wonder who added that.
Also, can someone, anyone, explain how this thread is a "conspiracy"? I assume the original posted did not do that.
I've never hit the abuse button before but I almost did when I saw those keywords. I decided not to so people could see what sort of bigots we have here.
Just for the record... The only "Keywords" I put on this posting were these (2008; ALIENS; COLORADO; TANCREDO; ILLEGAL.)
You are correct. I did NOT do that. I think that whoever did put that in the topics category is in fact tipping his hand concerning this thread. He and a few of his buddies are obviously conspiring to have this thread pulled and I find that offensive. Why are people allowed to edit my post or the post of anyone else by inserting bogus keywords and topics in the first place?
I made no accusation towards you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.