Posted on 11/03/2006 5:23:38 AM PST by PJ-Comix
What a coincidence! The New York Times publishes a story claiming that the release of secret Iraqi documents includes sensitive nuclear reasearch secrets from Iraq's 1996 FFCD Full, Final, and Complete Declaration (FFCD-F). However this same information was already dispersed to the member states of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which number 142 including Iran. So there was no information released that wasn't already known earlier. You can quickly get up to speed on this by reading the posting of Freeper JVERITAS on the Free Republic. And since the New York Times has now publicized these Iraqi documents which it pretty much ignored before, folks might note that the same document also show that Saddam Hussein was in the process of REBUILDING his nuclear weapons program which means we were justified in overthrowing his regime. Thanx for that little service there, NY Times, even though you really meant to hurt the EVIL Republicans in the upcoming elections. Of course, the DUmmies are now jubilant over the New York Times aid to the Democrats, little realizing that this publicity SHOWS that Saddam took a PERSONAL interest in rebuilding nuclear WMDs as you can see in this THREAD with the somewhat desperate title of "***RED F*CKING ALERT*** WHAT COULD BE MORE IMPORTANT - *** EVERYONE HERE SHOULD READ THIS (PLEASE)." So let us now watch the DUmmies celebrate the election boomerang tossed out there by the New York Times in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, watching the DUmmies attempt to kick Lucy's nuclear football once again, is in the [brackets]:
***RED F*CKING ALERT*** WHAT COULD BE MORE IMPORTANT - *** EVERYONE HERE SHOULD READ THIS (PLEASE)
[PLEASE! PLEASE! SAVE US FROM THE EVIL REPUBLICANS!!!]
BUSH ADMIN POSTED NUCLEAR BOMB BUILDING GUIDE ON INTERNET…
[IAEA DISPERSED THE SAME NUCLEAR "BOMB BUILDING GUIDE" TO 142 NATIONS.]
We have lost nearly 3,000 of our beloved soldiers because of the threat of Iraq having WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION and NOW the Bush administration is f*cking PUBLISHING "nuclear bombs for dummies" on the internet??????
[I'm PUBLISHING DUmmies for DUmmies on the internet. Among the published facts is that the IAEA already distributed the same info.]
Holy shit. Do we realize the significance of this?!!@#$!!! If we don't jump on this with everything we got -- then we DESERVE everything we get.
[All political as the New York Times intended it to be.]
ROFL!!! MY GOD, THE REPUKES ARE GOING TO CATCH HELL FOR THIS!!!
[Take a long running kick at Lucy's football because those same documents show that Saddam was personally planning to rebuild Iraq's nuclear program.]
Yep...who's to say that this isn't the reason N. Korea got the bomb?
[They read the widely distributed IAEA documents?]
The timing would actually be just right, wouldn't it?
[Yeah. Isn't it surprising about the timing of this release by the NY Times just a few days before the election.]
Stress - PRE-1991 nuclear research! This has NOTHING to do with post-Gulf War ALLEGED activities by Iraq.
[Yes. Let us just forget the inconvenient part of those SAME documents that show that in Jan. 2001 that Saddam was personally involved in REBUILDING his nuclear program which proves we were justified in overthrowing his regime.]
If anything will kick off Impeachment later this will be it!
[John Conyers is already preparing his broom closet for the impeachment hearings.]
This is so UNBELIEVABLY HUGE, that I'm having heart palpitations.
[Which will turn into a heart attack late on the night of Nov. 7.]
10:1 odds says that the "liberal" media says something to this extent: "A lot of this information was widey available already on the internet. Does it really even make a difference if our enemies found this new information?"
[You mean like at the IAEA WEBSITE?]
WE NEED A WEEKEND FULL OF "MUSHROOM CLOUD" TV ADS! ARE YOU DEM MEDIA CONSULTANTS PAYING ATTENTION?
[Don't worry. The Republicans will probably show those mushroom cloud TV ads to demonstrate that Saddam was planning on rebuilding his nuclear weapons program just like those SAME documents said.]
Lets see Rove spin this one.
[It was all a secret Rovian plot to publicize the fact that Saddam was planning on rebuilding his nuclear weapons program.]
The information on how to build a bomb has been out there, freely available in libraries across the country for years and decades now, if you knew what you were doing. Hell, back in the seventies a kid from Ohio ginned up a working model of a bomb as a high school project from information he acquired from various local libraries. Yes, the Pentagon, NRC, DOE and others freaked, but they also said that the kid had done such a good job that all he need was some plutonium. Whether or not Bush put this info out there is immaterial. If a person really wanted to build a bomb, and had training in nuclear physics, they could do so whether or not these documents were released. Yes, the irony is delicious, but the threat is overblown. You would have to remove virtually every single bit of information on nuclear physics if you are that worried, and frankly that's not going to happen.
[And this DUmmie WINS a nuclear powered Kewpie Doll for having a brief moment of mental clarity before he is tombstoned from DUmmieland!]
It might be that these are fairly sophisticated circuits, etc. But having worked in the nuclear industry, knowing what is freely available in the public arena, I stand by my statement. If it wasn't illegal, I would be willing to bet a great deal of money that I could build a bomb within a year using only publicly available documents. Hell, if you have a decent size university nearby, go stroll through their nuclear physics section in their library and see just how detailed these matters get. Again, it isn't the knowlege, or lack there of that is preventing people from building a bomb, it is lack of plutonium that is keeping the bombs out of the hands of ordinary citizens. Hell, go look at the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, they are really quite simple instruments.
[And soon to be tombstoned DUmmie madHound gives us an encore performance of rare DUmmieland RATIONALITY.]
It's a Perfect Rovian Mushroom Cloud.
Could be I suppose, the typical DUmmy would be an excellent model for a comical cartoon character. Wile E. Coyote is probably the brainchild of a cartoonist who had observed a DUmmy up close and personal.
Yes, and on the Sunday talk shows they will show Saddam being charged at his trial for multiple counts of murder! Perhaps he'll try to plea bargain - go on worldwide TV and admit where his weapons of mass destruction were sent and of all his duplicituous behavior!
These idiots wouldn't care if they had pictures of Saddam standing next to Fat Man and Little Boy. They fully believed that Saddam had the right to acquire nuclear weapons. It doesn't matter if he had them or not.
HAHA!
LOL, what an idiot. North Korea was building a nuke long before the capture of this document in 2003, like all during the 90s, and indeed had their first warhead in 1999 according to CIA reports.
Are these amoral low lives at the DU able to express themselves without profanity?
"Don't die on me, private DUmmie. That would break my F***in' heart!"
There was no doubt that Saddam Hussein was trying to obtain WMD, the only question was whether he was succesful in his attempts (some scientists have said that they deliberately thwarted his research efforts).
When a convicted felon who is out on parole goes to try to buy a gun, in violation of his parole, we don't say "well he didn't get a gun so he's still okay". Saddam Hussein violated the terms of the 1991 Gulf War "peace". Saddam Hussein restarted the war.
We were justified in deposing Saddam Hussein. He was offered the opportunity to step down prior to war. We did not go to Iraq to take their oil.
"Do not listen to the demon...he will mix lies with the truth to confuse you."
Seriously, I can't even stand to lurk there anymore. I don't know how PJ and you do it. I heard one of 'em call in to Medved yesterday (I'm presuming he was a DUmmie, because he had the same level of hate) and the dude actually said he wanted all the "Jesus freaks" in the world to die.
I thought, replace "Jesus freaks" with any other social group. I guess it depends on whom your "hate speech" is directed to that makes it right or wrong.
PJ, will there be a PM DUFU today? I have a new parody ready to launch, but it doesn't really fit the theme of this particular thread. It's more related to the idea of Election Day coming soon, and I want to get it in while there's still a few days left.
Which governments are uniquely capable of doing. Such as the government of Iraq under Saddam Hussein and his mad sons. Which is why they couldn't be allowed to continue in power, regardles of what we knew or didn't know about their actual, as opposed to their potential, capabilities. Which is why, post-9/11, we invaded Iraq to remove them from power. Which George W. Bush has done, thus removing the threat that they would acquire nuclear weapons and give them to terrorists, with whom they already had extensive connections, to use against us. Thanks to the presence of our troops in Iraq, that is now an impossibility. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! THANK YOU!
What do Michael Moore and Tom Daschle have to do with this?
That dude's expression of his hatred should actually be encouraging to Christians.
Jesus said, "Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you!". And, "Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you".
If blasphemous, hateful DUmmies admired me and wished me well I would be concerned that my behavior doesn't show any outward evidence of Christian piety in my life.
Amen. Everytime the guy told Medved he especially hated him, Medved would say "Thank you."
**I can't even stand to lurk there anymore. I don't know how PJ and you do it**
I don't either. I've limited my time over there. It really bothers me that we have such delusional people in our country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.