Why I am not voting Republican this fall [because I'm a retread zotted troll]

SmallGovTimes.com ^ | 09/23/2006 | William Calhoun

[Peisistratus]

"No, the Constitution Party will never win, period. "

I'm sure the Whigs thought the same.

[Darksheare]

Get lost.
"007"?
You think you're James Bond?

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Do you really think there would be support for an Amendment just for him? That enough states would want him President?

Pretty unlikely.

There's been nothing for well over a year on the subject.


This isn't just about Arnold, although he would be a perfect 'test case' for the globalists, what with his media popularity and Kennedy connections...If there were such an Amendment, La Raza would try to field candidates in every Presidential primary. So would Beijing and Iran and...

Silence for a year means those who were speaking about this in public aren't at the moment speaking about this in public. Communism works on the Hundred-Year Plan.

[Enterprise]

"Communism works on the Hundred-Year Plan."

Anyone who doesn't understand that should read David Horowitz.

[trooprally]

bttt

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

"bttt"

Shouldn't that be Bump to the BOTTOM? LOL

[Peisistratus]

"This isn't just about Arnold, although he would be a perfect 'test case' for the globalists, what with his media popularity and Kennedy connections...If there were such an Amendment, La Raza would try to field candidates in every Presidential primary. So would Beijing and Iran and."

My apologies. I thought from the tone of your post that you favored Arnold for President.

[California Patriot]

The Republican party was founded in 1854. Within two years, it was a major party. Within four years, if I'm not mistaken, it nearly won control of the House. Within six years, it elected a president. I don't know exactly when the "Constitution Party," under that name, was founded. But such a party has essentially existed since 1968. The "Constitution" people are, politically, the direct descendants of the American Independent party under George Wallace. 1968 was its high-water mark, when Wallace -- already a nationally-known politician -- got about 13 percent of the vote. It's been a political asterisk ever since. Get back to me when you guys have a multi-billionaire, in the Perot or Soros league, who will put a chunk of his fortune beyind you. Ain't gonna happen, I bet.

[Peisistratus]

"The Republican party was founded in 1854. Within two years, it was a major party. Within four years, if I'm not mistaken, it nearly won control of the House."

That was before the media machine known as the modern "two party system" came into existence. Just what Washington warned us about. The Party uber alles and damn the issues.

"Get back to me when you guys have a multi-billionaire, in the Perot or Soros league, who will put a chunk of his fortune beyind you. Ain't gonna happen, I bet."

"You guys"? Oh, you mean conservatives. It's all about money and power with the national party, that much is clear. Why should I spend mine on them? If this schism between conservative and liberal within the party continues, something else will take its place. I'm tired of being forced to vote for a liberal to avoid a liberal. I'll vote for Republicans who have earned my vote. No others. I will never vote for Rudy for President or any other of his ilk.

So, with individual contributions declining to the RNC, I do wonder which billionaires are funding their warchest. They certainly aren't the party of the "little guy" anymore - and in fact have open contempt for us. After the 2004 election, the Administration even started to call us names.

Nativist. Sexist. Racist. Vigilante.

I'm supposed to support those people? Why? Jeff Sessions for President.

[darkwing104]

I did some good work today to help my fellow man and doing some good deeds. What do I see coming home? A lying little troll!

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.

[California Patriot]

I hope you'll have the decency not to waste everyone's time and energy with gripes about the Democratic Congress, if we get one. You'll just say it's the same damned thing we would have had with a GOP Congress, right?

[Peisistratus]

"You'll just say it's the same damned thing we would have had with a GOP Congress, right?"

Have you seen the spending bills this Congress has put forward? I vote on issues, not parties. Fortunately, I have a good CONSERVATIVE Republican senator to vote for and another who usually follows the smart one. If it comes to a Rudy in 2008 - if that's who the national party anoints, I will not vote for him. You cannot motivate the voters through fear in this way. We're tired of it.

If I was one of McCain's constituents.... I mean, in that case, what's the difference?

[stephenjohnbanker]

" A Pack of Drips...WOW"

: )

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

"I thought from the tone of your post that you favored Arnold for President."

What part of 'en garde' do you not understand, mon ami? ;^)


en garde = beware.
mon ami = my friend.

Cheers!

[Peisistratus]

"en garde = beware. " en garde is often a formal warning before a sword duel commences.... ;)

" en garde = beware."

Bon chance to us all.

[vigilante2]

adios amigos

[trooprally]

BTTM - :-))

[dynachrome]

[JRios1968]

[Peisistratus]

You know, it is not only silly, but just plain low to continue to pile on a poster who is unable to respond.