Posted on 09/04/2006 12:49:47 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John
Simply because of its location next to the Soviet Union, Latvia was forcibly annexed by the Soviets and brutally occupied for fifty years. But don't call it an "occupation," says former Russian President Boris Yeltsin.
Denial is a common symptom for alcoholics, as well as megalomaniacs. Yeltsin, who somehow has manage to dodge the grim reaper, is probably both of those, so what he says shouldn't be taken seriously. Yeltsin visited Latvia last week, and his visit was undoubtedly another reminder to Latvians as to why they should be grateful they're an independent nation again.
From Mosnews.com:
Latvia should forget the word "occupation," and then its relations with Russia will improve considerably, former Russian President Boris Yeltsin said in an interview with the Latvian daily Neatkariga, quoted by the Baltic Times."You are blaming Russia for Latvia's occupation. Do you have any brain? Are you able to look at things in an objective way? Where was Russia at that time? There was no Russia. There was the Soviet Union. There was this monster. The Soviet Communist regime, which we were all fighting, said Yeltsin.
No. Yeltsin was not fighting the Soviet Union. He was nothing but an opportunist who saw Gorbachev's "Glasnost" as his chance to move up the ladder in Moscow. For decades, Yeltsin was a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
Oh, check out the URL for this story: http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/08/25/latvianobrain. Yes, "Latvia no brain."
I had no idea Yeltsin was still alive.
Hey, cut Yeltsin some slack.
He was the one who killed the Soviet Union, by, of all things, having Russia secede! We, the Russians, and the Latvians (among many others) should be grateful to him.
His point is that there is neither an identity nor a continuity between the Soviet Union and Russia as it exists today. Moreover that the Communist ideology was a foreign import, not indigenously Russian, infecting the half-Westernized intelligentsia first, so in some sense, Russia, too was occupied. Besides, it was a Georgian, not a Russian, at the helm of the Soviet state when it occupied Latvia.
Without help of Latvian gunmen emigrant communists could not occupy Russia in 1917. Communist ideology was sort of religion, exploiting some Christian commandments. But words of leaders diverged with deeds, as it is often occurs with politicians.
ping
Not exactly sure what your point is . . . are you suggesting that Russians are incapable of occupying a country themselves? How embarassing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.