I'll have to remember to pack my infant son's buttpaste in the checked baggage and not in the diaper bag.
The only solution for me is NOT to fly on a commercial carrier. Have not done so since 9-11. Besides killing the airline industry, the smoke and mirrors of the present security system does little to curb possible breaches.
If you can tell the difference between a Pakistani, a Hindu, or a Sikh, by just looking at them, great, but 99.9% of American's can't. I can't.
Hint, the turban probably means the guy's a Sikh, NOT a threat.
If you think you can tell someone's religion just by looking at them, my suggestion is that you're a moron.
So, let's single out all the men and women with darker skin, darker hair, and funny names?
Dern, I can't seem to find my violin. I guess that is to be expected since it is, after all, the world's smallest one.
I predict its "fall," soon after the Apocalypse.
I posted an opinion soon after the banning of all liquids in that I believed that the Terries had "won," even if they had not achieved their goals of exploding any airplanes.
Anytime "they" manage to disrupt our daily lives in order to conform and react to some new threat, "they" in fact have achieved a measure of success.
What next? Will we all be required to disrobe and board aircraft wearing a see-thru, plastic bag-like garment and be handcuffed to our seats for hours on end and be provided with catheters and bed pans to relieve ourselves; while all luggage is transported by special military transports under heavy guard?
As for myself, I, who spent 8 years in the USAF (and several as a crew chief flying around 1/2 the world and measuring time spent in the air in thousands of hours) and had traveled extensively in civilian life, who "used to" love to fly, (and has been around long enough to to have flown on propeller-driven aircraft; remember when we could smoke anywhere, on airplanes; did not have to so much as show any form of identification; could share and sell our unused tickets at will, to whoever, etc.) have given up, and now, will ONLY fly under the most serious and emergency conditions.
And even if all the soft drinks are safe, what about the cargo? It hasn't all been screened, you know. There could be a bomb in there, or in some resourceful terrorist's checked luggage. Come to think of it, who's checking the folks who check our bags?
Me too. ...and for what it's worth, the more of this crap we get, the sooner it will fall. Liberals are a very impatient bunch.
Michael Graham is making an excellent, albeit, subtle point. What passes for airline security in the US is, at best, a "smoke-and-mirrors" joke. From a number of incidents over the past 20 - 30 years, there is hard historical evidence to indicate that the biggest perpetrators of terrorism against the west are Muslim men between the ages of 17 and 40. It isn't a question of pulling all dark skinned people out of line and giving them a second look, it's a question of giving all Muslim men between the ages of 17 and 40 a second - and 3rd, and 4th, and 5th - look.
If a caucasian man, 5' 10" tall, 225 pounds, blond hair, wearing a Bob Marley tee-shirt robs your store, should the police focus on men who match that description, or 70 year-old grannies in wheelchairs and 4 year-old, red-headed Irish girls??
This is the idiocy perpetrated by the TSA in the name of political correctness and "not offending" or profiling the people whose single-minded focus in life is the complete and total destruction of western, non-Islamic civilization. Does this make ANY sense whatsoever NOT to profile those who match the criteria of the people trying to eradicate us from the face of the earth?? Would it make any sense for the police to drag a 40 year-old asian woman who is 4' 8" tall into court and charge her with the robbery that the 5' 10" tall caucasian male committed?
Until we actually come to our senses and start profiling those who match the criteria, we will see this idiocy proliferate right up to the moment when we draw our last breath in a death caused by some Muslim male, 17 to 40 years of age.
It's long past time for us to stop pretending that we actually have a security system and only do "feel good" things that give the flying public a veneer of "safety".
Buttpaste PING!.........
I'd like to tattoo that on some people's foreheads, but it's inaccessible due to being up their rectum.
Bump to that.
Thank goodness for "The Usual Suspects." It's pretty much the only reason I read the City Paper...that and the "Blotter." I guess "The Usual Suspects" is the paper's way of balancing out the liberal bias of every other article in the paper. Oh well, good to hear from Michael.
For what it is worth. I keep waiting for the fall of PC.
Yeah, I'm just not flying. Too much of a hassle.
I think (and hope) that PC will be as quaint and as laughable as many of the Victorian and Puritan prohibitions on speech, behavior, etc. are today (of course, many of those still hold in our culture). I know of nobody outside those whose 'jobs' is it to perpetuate PC that agrees with it, adheres to it, or thinks it's anything less than silly.
On a lighter note: I've seen Boudreaux's Buttpaste in the drug stores here in So. Cal. I laughed my @$$ off just reading the label the first time I saw it, and it never fails to get a chuckle out of me.