DUmmie FUnnies 07-28-06 (William Rivers Pitt Hides Behind Marc Ash's Skirt)

DUmmie FUnnies ^ | July 28, 2006 | William Rivers Pitt, DUmmies, and PJ-Comix

[PJ-Comix]

William Rivers Pitt has finally rendered up a non-answer about his part in the Non-Indictment That Dares Not Speak Its Name. This was in response to a challenge from DUmmie kstewart33 who boldly asked in this THREAD, "William Pitt: How about an explanation?" Unfortunately for DUmmie kstewart33, Pied Piper Pitt responds with a lame non-answer as we shall see. I wonder if Pitt will be allowed to be so evasive if he is forced to take the stand if there is a criminal trial against his buddy, Jason Leopold, for making threats against various bloggers including, most notably, SEIXON. Remember, Pied Piper Pitt was in the forefront of vouching for the "noble" journalistic integrity of Jason Leopold and has acted as his chief enabler on the Web. Therefore it is to be expected that any criminal proceedings against Leopold must include Pitt on the witness stand. One can only hope that such a trial will be televised so we can watch the squirmings and evasions by Bukowski's most devout patron. As usual, the Pied Piper Pitt evasion is in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, amused at the fact that Pitt placed his entire political cojones into the greasy palms of Jason Leopold, is in the [brackets]:

William Pitt: How about an explanation?

[I was DESPERATE to claw my way into fame. I figured that since it was a sure thing that Karl Rove would be indicted by Patrick Fitzgerald, why not announce it as a fact and then lay claim for this amazing scoop when it happened? Who knew that this could have completely backfired on me and now am so openly mocked by my fellow leftists that my only consolation is imbibing deeply of liquid refreshments nightly at Bukowski's?]

Now that you're posting again, might you give us all a full explanation of what happened concerning the Rove indictment/Jason Leopold/truthout fiasco several weeks back. You remember: the series of stories that had us all convinced that Rove would be indicted after 24 business hours or 48 or whatever?

[The indictment really happened. I just got a little ahead of the news cycle on that one. The indictment will be announced the moment the Great Pumpkin arrives.]

No fair sneaking back into the forums without telling all of us chumps what the heck happened.

[What happened is that I have gone from merely predicting indictments that didn't happen to prophesizing a grand apocalyptic End of the World VISION based on a complex series of events which must fit together perfectly like a vast jigsaw puzzle for it to happen.]

calling folks out is a no no.

[How dare you call on Pied Piper Pitt to account for making fools of us all.]

This is in bad taste. Regardless of the situation...

[Yecch! A fellow DUmmie seeks the truth. This is in bad taste.]

Thou shalt not ask for accountability...ye shall bow thy head and baa in acquiescence as does the rest of the DU flock.

[Ye shall bury thy head in the sand as does the rest of the DUmmie flock.]

Is this personal? Did he take away your virginity, or something?

[That is a question that might be asked in a courtroom concerning a certain Girls School scandal in Newton.]

Hey Bill- if you are reading this, somebody still loves ya, Baby!!!

[Is that you, Jason Leopold?]

I would venture to guess that Leopold was probably right and Death Star Cheney once again pulled off the impossible (to mere mortals) anyway. What HAVEN'T these assh*les gotten away with? Just sayin'.

[Yeah, Karl Rove really was indicted and Patrick Fitzgerald merely kept mum when Rove's lawyer lied about there being no indictment. It sounds like the Good Fairy Leopold has been sprinkling Pixie Dust on your brain.]

You should be ashamed for posting this. Will has done more for this party than you ever will.

[Absolutely. Will has done more to make the Democrats look like complete fools than you ever will. That videotape of the Michigan Democrats (including Hillary) standing up and cheering the Truthout announcement of the Rove indictment just can't be topped for sheer idiocy. Thanx, Will. You done GOOD!]

No one should ever be ashamed for wanting to know if information is true or not, and while I agree that Will Pitt certainly has every right, as much as anyone else to post here, I'd like to hear about that fiasco as well.. tho I imagine they might want to post it at their site and then link it here for us all to scratch our heads over

[They already did post an explanation at the TruthOut site. Karl Rove was really indicted but they just got ahead of the news cycle in announcing it.]

Will never claimed direct knowledge-he said he trusted the people whom claimed direct knowledge, as in "I doubt they are lying".....thereby lending his considerable weight to the story.As best I can guess,some deal was in fact arranged.Myself,I am tired of people that to this day post snarky stuff against both Leopold and TO.And to bring Will's credibility in when he was a character witness is unfair....till the entire cabal is taken down and the history is written, I'll abstain....

[According to Will himself, one of the sources that he trusted was Joe Wilson. And thanx for reminding us that Pitt was a character witness vouching for that font of journalistic integrity, Jason Leopold.]

Shameful violation of the rules. This will hopefully be locked VERY soon. SHAME on you.

[Shameful violation of DUmmieland rules. Seeking the truth. SHAME on you.]

Why don't we all just alert the mods.... I did. This is clearly against the rules.

[Clearly against the rules to seek out the truth in DUmmieland.... And now the moment we have all been waiting for. An uncharacteristically cryptic "explanation" from the Pied Piper himself. Heeeeeeeere's WILLLIIEEEEE!!!]

Ready?

I can't.

Not because I don't want to, or because there isn't a good one. I do and there is. But any and all information on this issue is going to come from Marc Ash, and he is my boss, and that's how it is. I am required to abide by the rules of my employer, and that's one of them.

Sorry.

And, P.S., I've been a member here since April of 2001, so I'm not sneaking anywhere.

[So there you have it. Pied Piper Pitt could easily give us an explanation about the Hoaxmas story but he can't because he must defer to that journalistic giant and fashion photographer, Marc Ash. If only fashion photographer Ash would give Pitt a deferment on the TruthOut rules, Pitt could explain the whole thing thus lifting the weight that is crushing his political career that never happened.]

Locking. Calling out another member is against the rules. Also, in the future, if you see something like this, please just hit the Alert button instead of telling the poster why their thread will be locked. The mods will handle it.

[Locking. Also in the future, any thread daring to question Pitt about the Non-Indictment That Dare Not Speak Its Name will be instantly locked.]

[bcsco]

" Pitt's father was a bigwig with the Alabama Democrat party."

I see. So, this automatically provides him with an aura of importance. He was, therefore I AM!

I can see where the DU gang (I almost mislabeled them by using 'crowd') would buy into such garbage.

[Mercat]

"I miss Allosaurs, by the way. Where the heck did he go????"

Life and freeperdome are fleeting. I dunno. But glad I raised the issue again. It is very important!

[SoothingDave]

Bad Pitt posted another thread and he snuck in that Karl rove's indictment is imminent.

Pitt posting that Bush's pronunciation of "nuclear" drives him nuts.

Hello, 1999? How's the weather back then?

SD

[bcsco]

"Yes, but I'll bet Bukowski's doesn't have a chocolate fountain.

If they do, it's modeled after the PITT'ster. Yuck!

[bcsco]

William Rivers Pitt - from your link... "I seize up like a poorly-oiled engine several times a day, and my teeth grate together so hard that it sounds like two icebergs colliding in the North Atlantic inside my head. It won't be long now before my body's ability to manufacture endorphins shorts out like an old fuse, and when that happens, I will probably collapse into a gibbering gob of pudding."

Sounds like it's 'Bukowski time' to me.

[bcsco]

One more post (with correction by me) from your link...

" am not freaking out about the impending imploded indictment of Karl Rove in the Valerie Plame investigation.

There, that fixed it!

[bcsco]

But here's a really good catch by one of the DUmmies (must've been a FReeper Troll) on Pitt's comments)...

"Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts)
Fri Jul-28-06 01:48 PM

Response to Original message 15. Karl Rove's indictment is imminent?

I thought Rove was indicted.

Or he would be indicted.

Or it was sealed.

I am having trouble keeping your story straight

Oh, oh, a call out! Time to lock this thread.

[gate2wire]

"We get a Kewpie Doll talking-head natterbrain named Tony Snow as press secretary for the administration..."

How about this jewel?
Wouldn't you just love to see a Tony Snow-Wee Willie pitt debate?

[gate2wire]

His response- "Old essay." That's it?

[bcsco]

"Wouldn't you just love to see a Tony Snow-Wee Willie pitt debate?"

It would have to happen at Bukowski's. And people would get tired of the PITT'ster wandering off to the bar during the on-air segments. Slosh slosh slosh...

[bcsco]

"His response- "Old essay." That's it?"

Yup! After all, Skinner has awarded him the crown of unaccountability by announcing the locking of any thread aimed at calling him out. Why should he respond with anything but 'Old essay', or whatever?

[Purrcival]

UNCHARACTERISTICALLY BRIEF, for Pitt!

[SoothingDave]

I see. So, this automatically provides him with an aura of importance. He was, therefore I AM!

Just pointing out he has a pedigree beyond just being an internet keyboard jockey. Take it for what it's worth, but I bet his involvement in politics pre-dated the WWW.

SD

[bcsco]

"UNCHARACTERISTICALLY BRIEF, for Pitt!"

Obviously written between Pitt stops at Bukowski's.

[bcsco]

"I bet his involvement in politics pre-dated the WWW."

Yes, bouncing on his daddy's knee, no doubt. Sorry. I just have no respect the the, er, man.

[Darkwolf377]

LOL Yes, see, the plan has to be kept secret, so those who might try to foil it won't find out.

Kind of like military secrets during time of war, you DUmmie a-holes!

[bcsco]

I had to take the dog to the vet this afternoon and stopped at Wal-Mart on the way home to get some meds for my own ear infection.

Getting out of my Jimmy I come face-to-face with a pit bull who's head is out the window of the S-10 next to me and he's trying to get to my face.

WOW! I'm still not over it. But, sitting here reading these DU threads again, it reminds me of the rabid DU in-your-face mentality and reaction to any opposing viewpoint. Case in point; the DU'er email I received at home (not here on FR) last Saturday because of a response I made to John F. Kerry at his official website, then posted here on FR. That response was virtually as rabid as the dog I just encountered. But then, they're all sweetness and light, aren't they?

[Darkwolf377]

They go rabid because the idea that someone has a different opinion from theirs terrifies them, as it suggests they may not know it all. They are intellectual cripples. I've posted here often and been called names, but while I would debate, I never feel threatened--I stand by my beliefs. DUmmies fantasize that once everyone sees the world they wish to create that all humans will go "WOW! So THIS is what you meant! I was so wrong to disagree with you!" Just as they think Islamofascists will have the same response if we all just sit and chat.

They hate because they fear.

[bcsco]

'Fantasize' is a great way to put it because that's all it is; fantasy. Since I've been exposed to the DU (and KOs) community through the DUFunnies I've see a lot of symptoms of what I'd consider irrational disorders (I'm no psychiatrist or psychologist, thank God). For example, I've seen delusion, illusion, paranoia, confessed drug dependency, obsessive-compulsive display, bigotry, and unjustifiable elitism (is elitism ever justified?). Whew!

Any rational person witnessing this is NOT going to buy into their world. That's just part of the delusional aspect I mentioned. And the fear you mention is part of their paranoia. But if they took a rational approach it could lead to even further delusion and paranoia. Thus, I see their rejection of reality as a defensive mechanism as much as anything.

[Darkwolf377]

Good analysis. I'm always surprised at how often folks over there mention their mental health issues. They have that uncomfortable habit of "letting it all out" which never helps you get to know someone, only pushes you away.