[Petronski]

Well, we picked the most "electable" candidate running in the '04 primary and we saw how that worked out.

If your party's "most electable" loses, ask yourself what that means about your party.

ROTFLOL

[Mr. Silverback]

If your party's "most electable" loses, ask yourself what that means about your party.

I think they were all just fooling themselves that Kerry was the most electable. I think that Gephardt would have done better--but still lost--but he couldn't get votes from the freaks that make up the mass of Dem primary voters.

[Purrcival]

"If your party's "most electable" loses, ask yourself what that means about your party."

It means NOTHING about our party!! It means that Bush and Rove STOLE THE ELECTION!!!!! YEEEEEAAARRRRRGGGGHHH!

[dirtbiker]

If you look at his policies, they're the most progressive.

AKA, his policies are the most liberal...

They're the best ideas.

...If this were the old USSR...

If he was president and people like him ran the senate and congress, things would actually start to improve.

If regression could be called an "improvement"....

Health care, education, the economy, the world stage.

Good, so-so, excellent and WHO GIVES A DA*#!

Sometimes, the best thing to do is do nothing and LEAVE THINGS ALONE! But the politicians prescribe to the idea of "IF it ain't broke, FIX it 'til it is!"