Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/20/2006 7:57:09 PM PDT by cyberdasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cyberdasher

Carbonated drinks? Very interesting.


2 posted on 06/20/2006 7:58:54 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

hmmm...they seem to ignore the problem of obesity


3 posted on 06/20/2006 8:00:21 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

More like lots of highly refined wheat and sugar water. Both are relatively new to the human diet. And both increase blood sugar levels substantially.


6 posted on 06/20/2006 8:01:08 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
That is so dumb. The reason why diabetes is up because they are eating too much sweets and gaining weight.People are eating too much Pop Rocks.
7 posted on 06/20/2006 8:01:13 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
Yet others see technical and theoretical problems with man-made simulations; although dozens of computer models all point to an indefinite continuation of the trend, no individual model can itself demonstrate a clear relationship between, say, and individual’s consumption of a beverage saturated with CO2 and the actual risk of diabetes.

In other words, it's a bunch of BS, just like "global warming".

8 posted on 06/20/2006 8:01:38 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

It's sugars fault.


10 posted on 06/20/2006 8:02:52 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

Pop Rocks is causing diabetes


11 posted on 06/20/2006 8:03:26 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Gentleman, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room - Dr. Strangelove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
Just a little over a month ago an autosomal recessive gene at the root of Type II diabetes featured in news stories about its discovery.

Didn't know you could use that gene to make soda pop though. Very interesting. Certainly could be some commercial possibilities.

13 posted on 06/20/2006 8:04:33 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
My BS flag is up and waving. There is no actual information presented in the article, and absolutely no evidence presented to back up the claim that carbonation is responsible.

Hell, the boy doesn't even bother to distinguish between Type I and Type II diabetes.

14 posted on 06/20/2006 8:09:17 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
Here are some facts about Americans' infatuation with sugar and syrup:

In 1967, Americans ate 114 pounds of sugar and sweeteners a year per capita, nearly all of it as either raw or refined sugar. In 2003, each person consumed about 142 pounds of sugar per year.

Since high-fructose corn syrup was developed more than 30 years ago, consumption of the sweetener, which flavors everything from soda pop to ranch dressing, has skyrocketed. Now Americans down about 61 pounds a year each.

Since 1950, soft-drink consumption per capita has quadrupled, from about 11 gallons per year to about 46 gallons in 2003--nearly a gallon a week per person.

With all that sugar-eating, it's no wonder people don't have much room for their vegetables. In 2003, Americans consumed, on average, a dismal 8.3 pounds of broccoli and just over 25 pounds of dark lettuces (the kinds that are really good for you).

Linky

15 posted on 06/20/2006 8:10:33 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

GoreBull Warning! Ahhhhhhhhh!




16 posted on 06/20/2006 8:13:08 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
And how many times over those 30 years have the limits on the tests for diabetes been reduced?

Sometime between early 2004 and April 2005, the top end of the acceptable range for the fasting glucose test was reduced from (IIRC) 110 mg/dL to 99 mg/dL. If my level (98) been just a few points higher, I would have become part of the 'diabetes epidemic' in 2005 (even though that level was several points lower than it had been the year before).

17 posted on 06/20/2006 8:17:19 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher
The main culprit is Polyunsaturated oils.
18 posted on 06/20/2006 8:36:41 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyberdasher

The problem can be more easily linked to low fat diets. Low fat diets are high in carbohydrates. Excessive carbohydrates cause weight gain and have a negative effect on blood sugar.

Soft drinks have long been a target of liberals. They also have a special hatred for "non-domestic foods", and cheap food in particular. That's why they push organic farming. I suspect this has something to do with their findings.


19 posted on 06/20/2006 9:58:38 PM PDT by Jaysun (In order to avoid being called a flirt, she always yielded easily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

ping


24 posted on 06/21/2006 7:42:10 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson