Posted on 05/26/2006 10:47:11 PM PDT by catholicfreeper
"But dont you think that there is hope that many of these nonsense provisions(SS Security for one) will be knocked out."
Nonsense provisions, huh ...
Then why wasnt this sham FIXED IN THE SENATE ALREADY?!?!
"I just think that any compromise bill would have to be very tough and would not have many false illusions of enforcement."
Why did the Senate pass a sham? Why did almost all Democrats vote for it? Why did Frist praise it?
Why did the Senate fail us so badly?
Well I have looked to the scriptures for guidance. I have also set back and looked at the commenatary and the back and forth between Christians of good faith in debate(The little of it that its been) on this whole issue. It seems on many Christian blogs ,Catholic or otherwise, there has been a big silence. Howevr , it seems that it comes down to issue of justice, of how we treat the forigner, and the power of the State and its responsibility. THere is guidance but no clean cut answers. I think one problem is that the modern nation-state that we know today is quite different from the state of Biblical times. For instance, when Jesus, Mary , and Joseph fled into Eygpt did they have to report to the regional authorities.? Were they Illegal Aliens? Who knows? I tell people when the engage thast particular scripture that example doesnt prove much to either side. It just raises questions and something for us to pray over. The same with many of the other scriptures dealing with Jews and the "alien question" as they were slowly playing out their role in salvation history.
I haven't commented much on the illegal immigration issue because the one-world thing is going to happen, because it's part of the plan of God, and there is no way to stop it.
Apparently, there was a meeting a little while ago that involved the notion of making North America like the European Union- borderless, free-flowing, one-worldish. We are almost like plastic soldiers on a child's toy battlefield- moving and being moved by a force over which we have no control and have no hope of halting.
I get angry about this, but then remind myself that we were told this was going to happen, it is happening, and they only way to escape the worst of it is through Christ.
I think part of the Senate bill is politics. I have no doubt that some of those provisions were put in there to get it out of the Senate no matter what. That particular Dems could say hey I supported you here. I am also cynical enough to know that many provisions were put in the Senate Bill so Republicans in the House could take credit for taking them out. I am sure there is good bit of that going on.
Even your cynicism is naive.
These were not put in there to be taken out.
The Senate bill was concocted to create a lie, a lie that we were fixing immigration with a 'comprehensive' solution. In fact it is a bait-and-switch scam, with amnesty for illegals the only real part of the bill. Most of the rest is a hood ornament for the sham-nesty.
Enforcement provisions actually *weaken* current law!
See:
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15165
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1092.cfm
There are a lot of third party people on Free Republic trying to gather support for just that "conspiracy" and they're leading a lot of good conservatives right off the cliff with them.
Okay...this convinced me (or at least until I quit reading at the part that erroneously stated that Rush was on the defensive in the Snow interview, which was blatantly untrue) Anchoress is really Barbara Bush.
You realize, of course, that this is the same logic that liberal revisionists in most mainline denominations have used to justify gay marriage. "It was so different then! People in Biblical times had no concept of committed same-sex relationships!"
Anyway, you can't just throw out a statement like yours, and not back it up. It's up to you to state exactly how the nation-state of Biblical times was different, if it was, and how those states were LESS likely to have controlled travel and immigration through their territory than those of the modern era, if that is in fact your argument.
For instance, when Jesus, Mary , and Joseph fled into Eygpt did they have to report to the regional authorities.?
So what if they did? That would have been among the least of their problems at the time. Probably even less onerous than having to return to Joseph's birthplace, on the emperor's order, to be taxed.
I read the transcript, I would say that Tony Snow was destroyed by Limbaugh, and I am not a Limbaugh fan in the least.
It is all fine and dandy for "conservatives" to have ideals anhjd all, but the reality is this influx of illegals and even in many cases legals, and all one has to see what has happened to California to see the future, will destroy conservatism as a viable political force. The anchoress form of go along get along "conservatism" is not only wrong, its dangerous.
Forget any idea of "Limited Govt." Now it is just a matter of which side gets to grow Govt to what THEY want to those they don't like.
Changing the law to benefit the lawbreakers is amnesty, no matter how you guys try to spin it.
The 1986 amnesty quadrupled the problem. So will any "reform" that gives any benefit at all to the present lawbreakers.
In twenty years, we'll have fifty million illegals to worry about.
Is your support for illegals mainly because the vast majority of them are Catholic?
"Why do I do not view this as Amnesty? Well, they do have to admit guilt. They have to pay fines, taxes etc. "They have to keep their nose clean for a period of time. I have heard 11 years in some proposals before they can even apply to be citizens. I really don't care if people want to add more provisions. 1000 hours of community service? I just have to think there is a middle ground less than they having to leave and wait 20 years to get back in and anything short of that is Amnesty. Again, the family issue is what probally drives me most as to this issue."
It is AMNESTY. Illegals would not have the opportunity to follow the proposed 'path to citizenship' if they were not granted AMNESTY first.
I don't see what the problem is with families. If you're deported, you take your family with you. Period.
You're a catholic "freeper" after being here a little over nine weeks? You've come a long way, baby, in a short time.
Leni
Succinct and correct.
Jay Rockerfeller thanked the press and media not long ago for keeping quiet about their globalist agenda until the average man had become "enlightened" enough to accept it.
Translation: Thanks for hiding all this from the public until it's too late for them to do anything but divide into two camps. The "enlightened" who will cause us no problems and go about their buisness, and the "xenophobe" camp who will cling to the dead idea of nationhood and must be delt with if they cause trouble.
I have an idea. Hunting season to give them a reason to run back over.
The only thing that Jesus promises us is to rule and reign with him a thousand years, if we remain faithful unto death after we are arrested, judged, imprisoned, beheaded, hunted down, property taken, and suffered greatly.
I refuse to be found hiding under the bed during the events of that time, which seems to be right around the corner. I don't know why, it just isn't in me. I know there is no stopping it, my head tells me to keep quiet maybe it will pass over me. I just can't get my big mouth to agree.=o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.