Posted on 04/14/2006 6:10:17 PM PDT by doug from upland
Civil Suits and the Clintons? I remember something about blue dresses and pants suits but civil suits?
God Bless you, Doug, for what you are doing for our FRee Republic.
Persist, persist, persist! Above all else, persist!
gale.holland@latimes.com Thanks for asking.
Doug - your day will come. It will be a pleasure rubbing this in the MSM faces.
"The story has only been seen on WorldNetDaily, NewsMax, and the NY SUN. Oh, and Tony Snow gave me 60 seconds at the end of his show on Wednesday (I think it was Wednesday)."
Townhall.com picked it up, too.
Do you have a link to the story?
BTTT
It came to me via e-mail and I've done several searches on Townhall.com and the Townhall Community to no avail. This is the only one I could find ( from 2003)...by Michelle Malkin: http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/michellemalkin/2003/06/20/169931.html
So, here it is again...without solicitations:
HILLARY CLINTON MOVES CLOSER
TO ANSWERING FOR FRAUD
Dear Friends,
Many people see Hillary Clinton as a charming and compassionate woman. She is depicted as a helper to the helpless and champion of the underdog. But, today, her wool suit is shrinking to reveal a very cunning, yet deceptively personable, wolf beneath. And even those from Hillary’s own pack are beginning to expose the truth.
Hillary has been forced to testify in a civil law suit in California brought by Peter Paul, the largest single campaign contributor to her 2000 Senatorial campaign. Paul has turned from a close associate of Bill and Hillary Clinton who underwrote the “Hollywood Salute to President Clinton” in 2000, to a whistle blower exposing the corruption and lies that were an underpinning of Hillary’s election to the Senate.
Hillary Clinton is desperately trying to avoid being put under oath and forced to testify about her involvement in the 2000 fundraiser for her Senatorial Campaign underwritten by Peter Paul. She has summoned every resource at her disposal to avoid making statements under oath about her knowledge of the under reporting of more than $700,000 on her campaign finance statements. The strategy of her high power Washington legal team, led by David Kendall (of Bill Clinton impeachment defense fame), is simple: delay as much as possible Peter Paul’s Civil suit and sacrifice the “small fish” associated with this wrongdoing.
Hillary Clinton is a candidate to return to the Senate in 2006 and a most likely a candidate for president in 2008,
In addition, The United States Justice Foundation is going to DEMAND that the U.S. Justice Department hire a Special Prosecutor to investigate the allegations against Hillary Clinton.
This is the LARGEST CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD IN HISTORY. Quite frankly, they hope that we simply run out of money to keep the suit going.
The United States Justice Foundation recently won an important appellate court decision, denying the motion to have Hillary Clinton dismissed from the case. This follows our victory several months ago of the denial of a motion to have the entire case dismissed.
As the United States Justice Foundation has dug deeper into the allegations made by
Peter Paul, it has become clear that this is a scandalous conspiracy – one that stinks of corruption, illegal acts and perhaps even a high-level cover-up.
While we are winning, the cost of holding Hillary Clinton to the rule of law is expensive. VERY EXPENSIVE. Nobody is above the law and we must get Hillary and Bill Clinton under oath and on the record. Under oath, they will have three choices: perjure themselves, tell the truth about their involvement, or plead the fifth amendment.
(omitted)
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Gary Kreep
President, United States Justice Foundation
Good job, Doug, for doing your part to keep this out in the open!
I applaud your tenacious perspicacity. Clearly, the Clintons and their operatives within their media "plantation" cannot outwit or out-wait you.
Re the LAT, I saw nothing in the Sacramento Bee about the trial either.
As a sidebar, I canceled the America-hating Bee a couple of months ago - - at they STILL keep delivering it. We've called and e-mailed, but still it comes. The Bee even called to ask why we canceled (our offspring wear the uniform, and we are offended daily by the anti-military, anti-American, pro-leftist social instruction).
Sidebar, continued. I tried to sell an auto with a Bee ad last year. Two weeks on ad produced only one (1) inquiry. Later, a few days ad in the internet site Craig's List, and we had non-stop inquiries, and auto sold in a few days.
Clearly, the Bee's circulation numbers are in descent mode (why else would they prop it up artificially with comp subscriptions?); and, smart advertisers might want to consider options to the daily paper.
.
Thanks for the ping Blurb, I keep an eye on these threads.
That a former president has a trial date for a major business fraud and that a sitting senator being deposed is an incredible story. Yet, it has only been reported by NewsMax, WND, NY SUN, and for about a minute on Tony Snow. That is astounding. Oh, I spoke about it on Mr. KABC last night and Tammy Bruce a few minutes ago. But that's it.
Thanks for the ping.
Doug, your effort and work is as important as anything I have read in 7+ years on the forum.
It directly affects our future. Thanks.
Thanks to Peter Paul, Stan Lee and everyone else involved.
Wow. Thanks for the kind words, PG.
Correction. I keep doing this --- the judge is Aurelio Munoz, not Lopez. Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.