To: Raycpa
What is wrong is the refusal to move from generalization to distinction when new proved information is obtained. Then it becomes bigotry. Before then its perfectly rational.
Much like I've done by posting this linked and footnoted article. Can we begin discussing it now or are we going to dance around the issue all night?
To: billyakovich
56 posted on
04/11/2006 1:56:36 AM PDT by
MEG33
( GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: billyakovich
BAM!!! He's gone.
I think his heart may have been in the right place, though.
59 posted on
04/11/2006 1:58:43 AM PDT by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: billyakovich
68 posted on
04/11/2006 2:16:33 AM PDT by
Number57
To: billyakovich
How do you debate something when you do not agree on the terms being used?
You have stated a case that all generalization is wrong. You further make the implied case that because Freepers generalize all freepers must be wrong.
How does one debate someone who has generalized and refuses to make distinctions?
72 posted on
04/11/2006 2:28:00 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: billyakovich
Much like I've done by posting this linked and footnoted article. Can we begin discussing it now or are we going to dance around the issue all night? Raycpa's post didn't dance. It was a very good explanation as to why people generalize. It's built into our survival instincts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
